[PRE REVIEW]: pynucastro: an interface to nuclear reaction rates and code generator for reaction network equations

[whedon]

Submitting author: @dwillcox (Donald Willcox) Repository: https://github.com/pynucastro/pynucastro Version: 1.0.0 Editor: @katyhuff Reviewer: @kyleniemeyer

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dwillcox. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@dwillcox if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. @katyhuff it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[dwillcox]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

🚧 🚧 🚧 Experimental Whedon features 🚧 🚧 🚧

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

[dwillcox]

@zingale This is our JOSS pre review issue.

[dwillcox]

A reviewer proficient in both Python and Fortran would be best able to assess this submission.

We would like to suggest @kyleniemeyer as a potential reviewer actively working in the closely related field of chemical combustion modeling.

[dwillcox]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[dwillcox]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[dwillcox]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof :page_facing_up: <--

[kyleniemeyer]

@katyhuff If you are editing this submission, I can review it

[kyleniemeyer]

@katyhuff although someone else in nuclear astrophysics may be good as a second reviewer

[katyhuff]

@kyleniemeyer : my pings to other reviewers so far have gone unanswered. It would be great if you'd be willing to review this -- I'll add a second reviewer as soon as an appropriate one arises.

[katyhuff]

@whedon assign @kyleniemeyer as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @kyleniemeyer

[katyhuff]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

You didn't say the magic word! Try this:

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[katyhuff]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/588. Feel free to close this issue now!

[katyhuff]

@dwillcox @zingale @kyleniemeyer , the review will happen over in #588 .