Closed editorialbot closed 1 year ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.06 s (623.5 files/s, 150606.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 17 341 959 2798
HTML 5 426 9 2702
Rmd 5 220 357 378
Markdown 6 104 0 308
TeX 2 22 0 194
CSS 1 17 0 80
YAML 1 1 4 18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 37 1131 1329 6478
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1392
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1214/09-sts313 may be a valid DOI for title: Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi890 may be a valid DOI for title: Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methods
- 10.1214/08-sts254 may be a valid DOI for title: Covariate balance in simple, stratified and clustered comparative studies
- 10.1017/cbo9780511810725.019 may be a valid DOI for title: Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score
- 10.1080/01621459.1999.10473858 may be a valid DOI for title: Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs
- 10.1198/106186006x137047 may be a valid DOI for title: Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
cvCovEst: Cross-validated covariance matrix estimator selection and evaluation in R
Submitting author: @PhilBoileau
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @Marie-PerrotDockes, @yunanwu123
Similarity score: 0.8252
bayestestR: Describing Effects and their Uncertainty, Existence and Significance within the Bayesian Framework
Submitting author: @DominiqueMakowski
Handling editor: @cMadan (Active)
Reviewers: @paul-buerkner, @tjmahr
Similarity score: 0.8244
medoutcon: Nonparametric efficient causal mediation analysis with machine learning in R
Submitting author: @nhejazi
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @erikcs, @rrrlw
Similarity score: 0.8205
effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters
Submitting author: @mattansb
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @trashbirdecology, @jkarreth
Similarity score: 0.8202
tipr: An R package for sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounders
Submitting author: @LucyMcGowan
Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active)
Reviewers: @gcskoenig, @MichaelSchomaker
Similarity score: 0.8188
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot invite @ajstewartlang as editor
:wave: @ajstewartlang – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot assign @ajstewartlang as editor
Assigned! @ajstewartlang is now the editor
@editorialbot add @nhejazi as reviewer
@nhejazi added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @jackmwolf as reviewer
@jackmwolf added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6093.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@ldliao<!--end-author-handle-- (Lauren Liao) Repository: https://github.com/ldliao/jointVIP Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.1.2 Editor: !--editor-->@ajstewartlang<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @nhejazi, @jackmwolf Managing EiC: Olivia Guest
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ldliao. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@ldliao if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: