openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
694 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: jointVIP: Prioritizing variables in observational study design with joint variable importance plot in R #5862

Closed editorialbot closed 7 months ago

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@ldliao<!--end-author-handle-- (Lauren Liao) Repository: https://github.com/ldliao/jointVIP Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.1.2 Editor: !--editor-->@ajstewartlang<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @nhejazi, @jackmwolf Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e129c0419dd539da37625f5517de1124"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e129c0419dd539da37625f5517de1124/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e129c0419dd539da37625f5517de1124/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e129c0419dd539da37625f5517de1124)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ldliao. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ldliao if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 9 months ago
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (623.5 files/s, 150606.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               17            341            959           2798
HTML                             5            426              9           2702
Rmd                              5            220            357            378
Markdown                         6            104              0            308
TeX                              2             22              0            194
CSS                              1             17              0             80
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            37           1131           1329           6478
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1392

editorialbot commented 9 months ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1214/09-sts313 may be a valid DOI for title: Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi890 may be a valid DOI for title: Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methods
- 10.1214/08-sts254 may be a valid DOI for title: Covariate balance in simple, stratified and clustered comparative studies
- 10.1017/cbo9780511810725.019 may be a valid DOI for title: Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score
- 10.1080/01621459.1999.10473858 may be a valid DOI for title: Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs
- 10.1198/106186006x137047 may be a valid DOI for title: Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 9 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

cvCovEst: Cross-validated covariance matrix estimator selection and evaluation in R Submitting author: @PhilBoileau Handling editor: @fboehm (Active) Reviewers: @Marie-PerrotDockes, @yunanwu123 Similarity score: 0.8252

bayestestR: Describing Effects and their Uncertainty, Existence and Significance within the Bayesian Framework Submitting author: @DominiqueMakowski Handling editor: @cMadan (Active) Reviewers: @paul-buerkner, @tjmahr Similarity score: 0.8244

medoutcon: Nonparametric efficient causal mediation analysis with machine learning in R Submitting author: @nhejazi Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired) Reviewers: @erikcs, @rrrlw Similarity score: 0.8205

effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters Submitting author: @mattansb Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired) Reviewers: @trashbirdecology, @jkarreth Similarity score: 0.8202

tipr: An R package for sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounders Submitting author: @LucyMcGowan Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active) Reviewers: @gcskoenig, @MichaelSchomaker Similarity score: 0.8188

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

arfon commented 9 months ago

@editorialbot invite @ajstewartlang as editor

:wave: @ajstewartlang – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

arfon commented 9 months ago

@editorialbot assign @ajstewartlang as editor

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Assigned! @ajstewartlang is now the editor

ajstewartlang commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot add @nhejazi as reviewer

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

@nhejazi added to the reviewers list!

ajstewartlang commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot add @jackmwolf as reviewer

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

@jackmwolf added to the reviewers list!

ajstewartlang commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6093.