[PRE REVIEW]: Mantik: A Workflow Platform for the Development of Artificial Intelligence on High-Performance Computing Infrastructures

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@rico-berner<!--end-author-handle-- (Rico Berner) Repository: https://gitlab.com/mantik-ai/mantik Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.4.2 Editor: !--editor-->@arfon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@zhaozhang<!--end-reviewers-list-- Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/31e03b578e512eb5565baca1a21fe268"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/31e03b578e512eb5565baca1a21fe268/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/31e03b578e512eb5565baca1a21fe268/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/31e03b578e512eb5565baca1a21fe268)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @rico-berner. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@rico-berner if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5194/egusphere-egu21-9632 is OK
- 10.1145/3399579.3399867 is OK
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3262138 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.21 s (1201.8 files/s, 93645.2 lines/s)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                             files          blank        comment           code
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                                 180           2242           1235          11428
Markdown                                43           1051              0           2509
YAML                                     5             38              8            431
JSON                                     9              5              0            219
TOML                                     1              9              0             72
Jupyter Notebook                         1              0            106             57
TeX                                      1              2              0             32
HTML                                     1              0              0             29
reStructuredText                         2             31             31             27
CSS                                      1              1              0             24
make                                     1              7              1             18
SVG                                      3              0              0              9
Bourne Shell                             2              0              1              8
Dockerfile                               1              1              0              2
Windows Module Definition                1              0              0              2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                                   252           3387           1382          14867
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1410

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GAMA: Genetic Automated Machine learning Assistant Submitting author: @PGijsbers Handling editor: @arokem (Retired) Reviewers: @jsgalan Similarity score: 0.8141

Application Skeleton: Generating Synthetic Applications for Infrastructure Research Submitting author: @zhaozhang Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @krother Similarity score: 0.8125

DARE Platform: a Developer-Friendly and Self-Optimising Workflows-as-a-Service Framework for e-Science on the Cloud Submitting author: @iaklampanos Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @rafaelfsilva, @Himscipy Similarity score: 0.8097

TUM Open Infra Platform: an open source package for simultaneous viewing and analysis of digital models in the civil engineering domain Submitting author: @pjanck Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active) Reviewers: @aothms, @CBenghi, @abdoulayediak Similarity score: 0.8086

CHAMP is a HPC Access and Metadata Portal Submitting author: @cc-a Handling editor: @crvernon (Active) Reviewers: @thurber, @acrlakshman Similarity score: 0.8075

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

@rico-berner - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[abhishektiwari]

@arfon I will be open to topic editing the workflow and dataflow related software submissions including this one. Let me know if I can be any help.

[arfon]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @arfon is now the editor

[arfon]

@cc-a @iaklampanos @zhaozhang – :wave: would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is Mantik: A Workflow Platform for the Development of Artificial Intelligence on High-Performance Computing Infrastructures

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Based on your experience, and past submissions to JOSS, we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out!

Many thanks Arfon

[arfon]

@rico-berner – if you have any other suggestions for editors, please let me know.

[zhaozhang]

I can review it after 12/01.

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 05:08 Arfon Smith @.***> wrote:

@cc-a https://github.com/cc-a @iaklampanos https://github.com/iaklampanos @zhaozhang https://github.com/zhaozhang – 👋 would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is Mantik: A Workflow Platform for the Development of Artificial Intelligence on High-Performance Computing Infrastructures

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Based on your experience, and past submissions to JOSS, we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out!

Many thanks Arfon

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5891#issuecomment-1825432884, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABEHWOGRZBXSR3CIM33333LYGBWY7AVCNFSM6AAAAAA5LOWSIOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMRVGQZTEOBYGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[iaklampanos]

Unfortunately I can't commit to reviewing this at this moment.

[arfon]

:wave: @krother – would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is Mantik: A Workflow Platform for the Development of Artificial Intelligence on High-Performance Computing Infrastructures

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Based on your experience, and past submissions to JOSS, we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out!

Many thanks Arfon

[rico-berner]

@rico-berner – if you have any other suggestions for editors, please let me know.

@arfon Unfortunately, I don't have any suggestions.

[arfon]

@editorialbot assign @zhaozhang as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[arfon]

@editorialbot add @zhaozhang as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@zhaozhang added to the reviewers list!

[arfon]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6136.

[arfon]

@zhaozhang - many thanks for agreeing to review this submission. I'll go ahead and start the review while I look for a second reviewer. @rico-berner @zhaozhang – see you over in #6136 where the actual review will take place.