[PRE REVIEW]: BGmisc: An R Package for Extended Behavior Genetics Analysis

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@smasongarrison<!--end-author-handle-- (S. Mason Garrison) Repository: https://github.com/R-Computing-Lab/BGmisc/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0 Editor: !--editor-->@osorensen<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @wjakethompson, @mhu48 Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee3a025be4f61584f977a7657d936187"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee3a025be4f61584f977a7657d936187/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee3a025be4f61584f977a7657d936187/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ee3a025be4f61584f977a7657d936187)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @smasongarrison. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@smasongarrison if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.03 s (1059.9 files/s, 166165.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                             4            140              8           1794
R                               17            105            587            916
Markdown                         5            165              0            625
XML                              1              0              2            441
TeX                              1              9              0            201
Rmd                              6            165            289            114
YAML                             2              9              4             70
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            36            593            890           4161
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1203

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1086/279872 is OK
- 10.1159/000363105 is OK
- 10.1080/10705511.2018.1493385 is OK
- 10/f8rfrg is OK
- 10.1007/s10519-021-10055-x is OK
- 10.1007/s10519-020-10037-5 is OK
- 10/ff3dbm is OK
- 10.1007/s10519-008-9225-0 is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-387-21750-5_5 is OK
- 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00802.x is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

bmgarch: An R-Package for Bayesian Multivariate GARCH models Submitting author: @ph-rast Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active) Reviewers: @ChristopherLucas, @mwt Similarity score: 0.8321

rTASSEL: An R interface to TASSEL for analyzing genomic diversity Submitting author: @btmonier Handling editor: @fboehm (Active) Reviewers: @tkchafin, @tomsing1 Similarity score: 0.8271

genieR: An R package for inference of demographic history of phylogenies Submitting author: @xiangfstats Handling editor: @pjotrp (Retired) Reviewers: @pboesu Similarity score: 0.8246

GeneNetwork: framework for web-based genetics Submitting author: @pjotrp Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @krother, @agarie Similarity score: 0.8157

fitODBOD: An R Package to Model Binomial Outcome Data using Binomial Mixture and Alternate Binomial Distributions. Submitting author: @Amalan-ConStat Handling editor: @csoneson (Active) Reviewers: @osorensen, @jjharden Similarity score: 0.8087

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

@editorialbot query scope

@smasongarrison – this submission is one the smaller side of what we'd typically publish here so I'm going to start a scope query with the broader editorial team. This will take a couple of weeks to complete.

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[smasongarrison]

@editorialbot query scope

@smasongarrison – this submission is one the smaller side of what we'd typically publish here so I'm going to start a scope query with the broader editorial team. This will take a couple of weeks to complete.

Could you expand upon this some more? Because I'm not sure, I'm understanding what you mean by small in scope.

Nevermind, I misread what you wrote.

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[oliviaguest]

@smasongarrison I am really sorry things are so slow-moving. I will try and focus on speeding this up, but at the moment I am struggling to find an editor with the appropriate expertise. If nobody is found soon, I will take this over myself.

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

bmgarch: An R-Package for Bayesian Multivariate GARCH models Submitting author: @ph-rast Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active) Reviewers: @ChristopherLucas, @mwt Similarity score: 0.8409

rTASSEL: An R interface to TASSEL for analyzing genomic diversity Submitting author: @btmonier Handling editor: @fboehm (Active) Reviewers: @tkchafin, @tomsing1 Similarity score: 0.8323

genieR: An R package for inference of demographic history of phylogenies Submitting author: @xiangfstats Handling editor: @pjotrp (Retired) Reviewers: @pboesu Similarity score: 0.8306

GeneNetwork: framework for web-based genetics Submitting author: @pjotrp Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @krother, @agarie Similarity score: 0.8236

rigr: Regression, Inference, and General Data Analysis Tools in R Submitting author: @yiqunchen Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @stefanocoretta, @tomsing1 Similarity score: 0.8145

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[oliviaguest]

@fboehm @osorensen @jbytecode is anybody experienced and available to take this one? 😌

[osorensen]

Sure!

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @osorensen as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @osorensen is now the editor

[osorensen]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

bmgarch: An R-Package for Bayesian Multivariate GARCH models Submitting author: @ph-rast Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active) Reviewers: @ChristopherLucas, @mwt Similarity score: 0.8415

genieR: An R package for inference of demographic history of phylogenies Submitting author: @xiangfstats Handling editor: @pjotrp (Retired) Reviewers: @pboesu Similarity score: 0.8325

rTASSEL: An R interface to TASSEL for analyzing genomic diversity Submitting author: @btmonier Handling editor: @fboehm (Active) Reviewers: @tkchafin, @tomsing1 Similarity score: 0.8309

GeneNetwork: framework for web-based genetics Submitting author: @pjotrp Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @krother, @agarie Similarity score: 0.8264

rigr: Regression, Inference, and General Data Analysis Tools in R Submitting author: @yiqunchen Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @stefanocoretta, @tomsing1 Similarity score: 0.8156

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[osorensen]

:wave: @mhu48, @vankesteren, @wjakethompson, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[wjakethompson]

I don't have any experience with behavior genetics, so I'm would not be able to give feedback on the accuracy/quality of the methods. I could review for R package best practices (e.g., test coverage, documentation, etc.) if that would be helpful.

[mhu48]

Happy to do so, look like an interesting contribution!

Øystein Sørensen @.***> 于 2024年1月7日周日 14:05写道：

👋 @mhu48 https://github.com/mhu48, @vankesteren https://github.com/vankesteren, @wjakethompson https://github.com/wjakethompson, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5894#issuecomment-1880157525, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKGGVY3KJ46SHY65QSZLDCLYNL5YLAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5LOXWF2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQOBQGE2TONJSGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[osorensen]

I don't have any experience with behavior genetics, so I'm would not be able to give feedback on the accuracy/quality of the methods. I could review for R package best practices (e.g., test coverage, documentation, etc.) if that would be helpful.

Thanks @wjakethompson, that would be really helpful. The R package best practices are also the main aspects of a JOSS review, so I'll add you as a reviewer.

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @wjakethompson as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@wjakethompson added to the reviewers list!

[osorensen]

@editorialbot add @mhu48 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@mhu48 added to the reviewers list!

[osorensen]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6203.