search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
694 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Opyrability: A Python package for process operability analysis #5909

Closed editorialbot closed 8 months ago

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@victoraalves<!--end-author-handle-- (Victor Alves) Repository: https://github.com/CODES-group/opyrability Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.4.3 Editor: !--editor-->@kyleniemeyer<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @gmxavier, @mustafaalsalmi1999 Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c777df5bfaf8c950d7e118185e987491"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c777df5bfaf8c950d7e118185e987491/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c777df5bfaf8c950d7e118185e987491/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c777df5bfaf8c950d7e118185e987491)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @victoraalves. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@victoraalves if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 9 months ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.18 s (818.8 files/s, 285192.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            20           3357             78           9771
JavaScript                      19           2497           2599           9653
CSS                             12            811            115           2904
PO File                         45           1007              0           2284
Python                           9            855            706           1887
Jupyter Notebook                18              0           9631           1056
TeX                              2            116              2            881
SVG                              6              2             34            696
Markdown                         6            229              0            630
reStructuredText                 4            150            109            243
YAML                             9             36             30            188
TOML                             1              3              0             36
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           151           9063          13304          30229
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1439

editorialbot commented 9 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04337 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05181 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.15439 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b05482 is OK
- 10.1021/ie1009316 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106979 is OK
- 10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00217-4 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.11579 is OK
- 10.1016/S0959-1524(99)00045-1 is OK
- 10.1021/ie0490076 is OK
- 10.1021/jp506259k is OK
- 10.1002/aic.16113 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.06.005 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.11228 is OK
- 10.1007/s12247-010-9086-y is OK
- 10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.04.008 is OK
- 10.2514/1.6386 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-0-444-64241-7.50390-6 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.12021 is OK
- 10.1021/ie0109814 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.18119 is OK
- 10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107835 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1115/1.4018788 may be a valid DOI for title: Process lags in automatic-control circuits

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.055 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.12.010 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63578-5.50025-6 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

OpenOA: An Open-Source Codebase For Operational Analysis of Wind Farms Submitting author: @jordanperr Handling editor: @sjpfenninger (Retired) Reviewers: @gschivley, @brynpickering Similarity score: 0.8014

opty: Software for trajectory optimization and parameter identification using direct collocation Submitting author: @moorepants Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @stavness Similarity score: 0.8012

ddop: A python package for data-driven operations management Submitting author: @AndreasPhilippi Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @kramea, @g4brielvs Similarity score: 0.8005

Linopy: Linear optimization with n-dimensional labeled variables Submitting author: @fabianhofmann Handling editor: @Fei-Tao (Active) Reviewers: @torressa, @g4brielvs Similarity score: 0.8002

TESPy: Thermal Engineering Systems in Python Submitting author: @fwitte Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active) Reviewers: @arosen93, @corentin-dev Similarity score: 0.8002

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

kyleniemeyer commented 9 months ago

Hi @victoraalves, I'm going to edit your submission. Any reviewer suggestions you have would be welcome!

Also, please take a look at those DOI messages for your paper.

kyleniemeyer commented 9 months ago

@editorialbot assign @kyleniemeyer as editor

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Assigned! @kyleniemeyer is now the editor

kyleniemeyer commented 9 months ago

Hi @AndreasPhilippi, this package has some relevance to your published JOSS article from a few years ago. Could you help us by reviewing this submission?

kyleniemeyer commented 9 months ago

Hello @kramea, would you be able to review this submission to JOSS?

victoraalves commented 9 months ago

Hi @victoraalves, I'm going to edit your submission. Any reviewer suggestions you have would be welcome!

Also, please take a look at those DOI messages for your paper.

Hi @kyleniemeyer thank you! I have fixed the invalid/missing DOIs mentioned by the editorialbot. For now I agree with your suggestions for reviewers.

victoraalves commented 9 months ago

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Hello @victoraalves, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
victoraalves commented 9 months ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 9 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04337 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.055 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05181 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.15439 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b05482 is OK
- 10.1021/ie1009316 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.12.010 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-0-444-63578-5.50025-6 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106979 is OK
- 10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00217-4 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.11579 is OK
- 10.1016/S0959-1524(99)00045-1 is OK
- 10.1021/ie0490076 is OK
- 10.1021/jp506259k is OK
- 10.1002/aic.16113 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.06.005 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.11228 is OK
- 10.1007/s12247-010-9086-y is OK
- 10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.04.008 is OK
- 10.2514/1.6386 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-0-444-64241-7.50390-6 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.12021 is OK
- 10.1115/1.4018788 is OK
- 10.1021/ie0109814 is OK
- 10.1002/aic.18119 is OK
- 10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107835 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
victoraalves commented 9 months ago

@kyleniemeyer Based on the JOSS list, some other reviewers can be, in case the others don't respond: Gilberto M. Xavier, Andy Shahidehpour, Mark E Fuller. I focused my search on people related to Chemical Engineering & Python development. Needless to say I declare no COIs. I don't know any of these people.

kyleniemeyer commented 9 months ago

Hello @gmxavier, are you able to review this submission for JOSS?

kyleniemeyer commented 9 months ago

Hello @mefuller, are you able to review this submission for JOSS?

gmxavier commented 9 months ago

Yes, I’am. Could you send me instructions about what I have to do?Enviado do meu iPhoneEm 10 de out. de 2023, à(s) 13:27, Kyle Niemeyer @.***> escreveu: Hello @gmxavier, are you able to review this submission for JOSS?

—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

mefuller commented 9 months ago

Hello @mefuller, are you able to review this submission for JOSS?

Hi, sorry, I cannot commit at this time @kyleniemeyer

kyleniemeyer commented 9 months ago

Thanks @gmxavier! We have reviewer guidelines written up you can look through. Briefly, once we find a second reviewer, I will start a separate review issue, where you will generate a checklist of items to work through.

You'll need to download and install the software, and inspect the repository and submitted paper for key elements. Any feedback you have for the authors can be given as a comment in the review issue, or as an issue at the package's repository.

kyleniemeyer commented 9 months ago

@editorialbot add @gmxavier as reviewer

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

@gmxavier added to the reviewers list!

kyleniemeyer commented 8 months ago

Hello @mustafaalsalmi1999, are you available to edit this submission to JOSS?

mustafaalsalmi1999 commented 8 months ago

Yes, I am happy to help.

kyleniemeyer commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot add @mustafaalsalmi1999 as reviewer

Thanks @mustafaalsalmi1999!

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

@mustafaalsalmi1999 added to the reviewers list!

kyleniemeyer commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5966.