search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
720 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: PARMESAN: Meteorological Timeseries and Turbulence Analysis Backed by Symbolic Mathematics #5919

Closed editorialbot closed 10 months ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@nobodyinperson<!--end-author-handle-- (Yann Büchau) Repository: https://gitlab.com/tue-umphy/software/parmesan Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: 2.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@martinfleis<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @kgoebber, @arbennett Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/074a3313d16e2a60d61ab59272851f7d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/074a3313d16e2a60d61ab59272851f7d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/074a3313d16e2a60d61ab59272851f7d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/074a3313d16e2a60d61ab59272851f7d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nobodyinperson. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@nobodyinperson if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.16 s (530.2 files/s, 85834.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          57           1195           2014           5354
Jupyter Notebook                 9              0           2972            745
Markdown                         6            140             13            369
TeX                              1             27              0            244
YAML                             1             11              5            129
reStructuredText                 5            119            131            118
make                             2             15              8             64
TOML                             2              5              0             54
Nix                              1              0              5             22
CSS                              1              0              0              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            85           1512           5148           7102
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1742

editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1127/metz/2022/1125 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7948293 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.103 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8239932 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.148 is OK
- 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0125.1 is OK
- 10.1109/MEMB.2009.932477 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8 is OK
- 10.1029/2019GL085083 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-52171-4 is OK
- 10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.828 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
kthyng commented 1 year ago

Hi @nobodyinperson and apologies for the delay in getting this going (I've been out of office). We have a waitlist at the moment since our editorial staff is maxxed out so I will add this to our waitlist. Thanks for your patience.

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

MetSim: A Python package for estimation and disaggregation of meteorological data Submitting author: @arbennett Handling editor: @sjpfenninger (Retired) Reviewers: @Chilipp, @dsryberg Similarity score: 0.8209

PySDM v1: particle-based cloud modeling package for warm-rain microphysics and aqueous chemistry Submitting author: @piotrbartman Handling editor: @dhhagan (Active) Reviewers: @darothen, @josephhardinee Similarity score: 0.8183

TESPy: Thermal Engineering Systems in Python Submitting author: @fwitte Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active) Reviewers: @arosen93, @corentin-dev Similarity score: 0.8047

BATMAN: Statistical analysis for expensive computer codes made easy Submitting author: @tupui Handling editor: @katyhuff (Retired) Reviewers: @mikeckennedy Similarity score: 0.8036

PYroMat: A Python package for thermodynamic properties Submitting author: @jranalli Handling editor: @jgostick (Active) Reviewers: @espottesmith, @fwitte Similarity score: 0.8019

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

nobodyinperson commented 1 year ago

Hi @nobodyinperson and apologies for the delay in getting this going (I've been out of office). We have a waitlist at the moment since our editorial staff is maxxed out so I will add this to our waitlist. Thanks for your patience.

@kthyng No worries, thank you for your work at JOSS.

nobodyinperson commented 1 year ago

A preprint of this PARMESAN manuscript is available here: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.15063

nobodyinperson commented 1 year ago

I fixed the broken DOI.

@editorialbot check references

kthyng commented 1 year ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 1 year ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1127/metz/2022/1125 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7948293 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.103 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8239932 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.148 is OK
- 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0125.1 is OK
- 10.1002/spe.828 is OK
- 10.1109/MEMB.2009.932477 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8 is OK
- 10.1029/2019GL085083 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-52171-4 is OK
- 10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
kthyng commented 1 year ago

@nobodyinperson the editorial bot command has to be the first thing in a comment to be recognized.

kthyng commented 11 months ago

@martinfleis I know its outside your main expertise, but would you be up for editing this submission?

kthyng commented 11 months ago

@editorialbot invite @martinfleis as editor

editorialbot commented 11 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

martinfleis commented 11 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 11 months ago

Assigned! @martinfleis is now the editor

nobodyinperson commented 11 months ago

Thank you @martinfleis, much appreciated! 🙂

martinfleis commented 11 months ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 11 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1127/metz/2022/1125 is OK
- 10.31223/X5ZX0D is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7948293 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.103 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8239932 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.148 is OK
- 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0125.1 is OK
- 10.1002/spe.828 is OK
- 10.1109/MEMB.2009.932477 is OK
- 10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8 is OK
- 10.1029/2019GL085083 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-52171-4 is OK
- 10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
martinfleis commented 11 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 11 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

martinfleis commented 11 months ago

Hi @nobodyinperson 👋, I'll be the editor if this submission. If you'll have any queries, send them my way.

If you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission. Your submission is slightly off my expertise, so any help with finding suitable reviewers would help. Thanks!

editorialbot commented 11 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

MetSim: A Python package for estimation and disaggregation of meteorological data Submitting author: @arbennett Handling editor: @sjpfenninger (Retired) Reviewers: @Chilipp, @dsryberg Similarity score: 0.8234

PySDM v1: particle-based cloud modeling package for warm-rain microphysics and aqueous chemistry Submitting author: @piotrbartman Handling editor: @dhhagan (Active) Reviewers: @darothen, @josephhardinee Similarity score: 0.8197

TESPy: Thermal Engineering Systems in Python Submitting author: @fwitte Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active) Reviewers: @arosen93, @corentin-dev Similarity score: 0.8097

BATMAN: Statistical analysis for expensive computer codes made easy Submitting author: @tupui Handling editor: @katyhuff (Retired) Reviewers: @mikeckennedy Similarity score: 0.8037

PYroMat: A Python package for thermodynamic properties Submitting author: @jranalli Handling editor: @jgostick (Active) Reviewers: @espottesmith, @fwitte Similarity score: 0.8037

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

martinfleis commented 11 months ago

Hi @arbennett and @kgoebber, I think that your expertise is very close to this submission. Would you be willing to review PARMESAN for JOSS? Thanks!

kgoebber commented 10 months ago

@martinfleis, sure, I can review this submission

martinfleis commented 10 months ago

@editorialbot add @kgoebber as reviewer

@kgoebber Thanks!

editorialbot commented 10 months ago

@kgoebber added to the reviewers list!

arbennett commented 10 months ago

@martinfleis - I can also review this!

nobodyinperson commented 10 months ago

Thank you very much @arbennett and @kgoebber, this is much appreciated! 🙂

martinfleis commented 10 months ago

@editorialbot add @arbennett as reviewer

editorialbot commented 10 months ago

@arbennett added to the reviewers list!

martinfleis commented 10 months ago

Thank you both!

martinfleis commented 10 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 10 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6127.