[PRE REVIEW]: scida: scalable analysis for scientific big data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@cbyrohl<!--end-author-handle-- (Chris Byrohl) Repository: https://github.com/cbyrohl/scida Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v0.2.3 Editor: !--editor-->@mbobra<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @egaraldi, @kyleaoman Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c7361dc4526bc2934c99b0ba4a12dc86"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c7361dc4526bc2934c99b0ba4a12dc86/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c7361dc4526bc2934c99b0ba4a12dc86/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c7361dc4526bc2934c99b0ba4a12dc86)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cbyrohl. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@cbyrohl if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.20 s (620.0 files/s, 72159.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          68           1303           1199           6899
YAML                            20            105             87           1544
Markdown                        22            414              0           1119
SVG                              5              0              0            892
TeX                              1              9              0            138
CSS                              1             19              1             95
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0            738             93
TOML                             1              6              1             63
make                             1              5              0             16
JavaScript                       1              3              0             15
Bourne Shell                     2              1              2             13
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           127           1865           2028          10887
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 867

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3847/1538-3881/aadae0 is OK
- 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/9 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7331952 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stad1779 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PiSCAT: A Python Package for Interferometric Scattering Microscopy Submitting author: @po60nani Handling editor: @emdupre (Active) Reviewers: @ziatdinovmax, @aquilesC Similarity score: 0.8195

TransBigData: A Python package for transportation spatio-temporal big data processing, analysis and visualization Submitting author: @ni1o1 Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active) Reviewers: @jGaboardi, @anitagraser Similarity score: 0.8183

LISC: A Python Package for Scientific Literature Collection and Analysis Submitting author: @TomDonoghue Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @timClicks, @linuxscout Similarity score: 0.8163

DataLad: distributed system for joint management of code, data, and their relationship Submitting author: @yarikoptic Handling editor: @arokem (Retired) Reviewers: @szorowi1, @jkanche Similarity score: 0.8156

Visualization of Multi-Dimensional Data -- The data-slicer Package Submitting author: @kuadrat Handling editor: @timtroendle (Active) Reviewers: @sabinomaggi, @Chilipp Similarity score: 0.8122

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[dfm]

@cbyrohl — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!

[dnelson86]

Possible reviewers: kyleaoman, jborrow, egaraldi, matthieuschaller, profxj, mtremmel

[mbobra]

@editorialbot assign @mbobra as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @mbobra is now the editor

[mbobra]

👋 @dnelson86 I'll be editing your submission. Thank you for the list of suggested reviewers -- please give me a little time to assign to reviewers to your submission and then we can begin the review.

[mbobra]

@editorialbot add @egaraldi as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@egaraldi added to the reviewers list!

[mbobra]

@editorialbot add @kyleaoman as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@kyleaoman added to the reviewers list!

[mbobra]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6064.

[mbobra]

👋 @EGaraldi @kyleaoman @cbyrohl See you in the review over at #6064.