[PRE REVIEW]: Sunny: A Python program to ease Ussing chamber data analysis

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@AdrianoTech<!--end-author-handle-- (Adriano Sanna) Repository: https://github.com/AdrianoTech/sunny_v2.0.git Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v2.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c6de85b700a5dc1cdbd3302a38aa0d29"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c6de85b700a5dc1cdbd3302a38aa0d29/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c6de85b700a5dc1cdbd3302a38aa0d29/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c6de85b700a5dc1cdbd3302a38aa0d29)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AdrianoTech. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AdrianoTech if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.25 s (20.0 files/s, 2047.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           1             52             18            291
Markdown                         2             19              0             61
TeX                              1              3              0             46
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             5             75             22            416
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 475

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-319-16104-4_24 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PyCHAM: CHemistry with Aerosol Microphysics in Python Submitting author: @simonom Handling editor: @jedbrown (Active) Reviewers: @dhhagan, @samjsilva91 Similarity score: 0.8112

PatchView: A Python Package for Patch-clamp Data Analysis and Visualization Submitting author: @ZeitgeberH Handling editor: @jmschrei (Active) Reviewers: @mstimberg, @janfreyberg Similarity score: 0.8003

fuelcell: A Python package and graphical user interface for electrochemical data analysis Submitting author: @samaygarg Handling editor: @jgostick (Active) Reviewers: @jlopata21, @shimpalee Similarity score: 0.7942

HydDown: A Python package for calculation of hydrogen (or other gas) pressure vessel filling and discharge Submitting author: @andr1976 Handling editor: @fraukewiese (Active) Reviewers: @mefuller, @bocklund Similarity score: 0.7936

QMix: A Python package for simulating the quasiparticle tunneling currents in SIS junctions Submitting author: @garrettj403 Handling editor: @labarba (Retired) Reviewers: @FaustinCarter, @josephhardinee, @PaulKGrimes Similarity score: 0.7922

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@AdrianoTech thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC for this track. I have checked this submission and your software repository. Unfortunately I have concluded this work does not conform to our substantial scholarly effort criteria, and is hence not in scope for JOSS.

I will now proceed to reject this submission.

Note that this rejection is purely based on the scope, it does not mean the work is of a poor quality or not useful.

We hope you'll consider JOSS for any future (re)submissions of a more substantial nature.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.

[AdrianoTech]

@AdrianoTech thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC for this track. I have checked this submission and your software repository. Unfortunately I have concluded this work does not conform to our substantial scholarly effort criteria, and is hence not in scope for JOSS.

I will now proceed to reject this submission.

Note that this rejection is purely based on the scope, it does not mean the work is of a poor quality or not useful.

We hope you'll consider JOSS for any future (re)submissions of a more substantial nature.

Dear Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, I would like to ask you, why do you think that my program does not match the "substantial scholarly effort criteria"? On GitHub I provided the raw scientific data, so that you can analize both manually (with Excel) and with my program. Allowing a clear comparison. Please, help me to understand so that I can improve it