Closed editorialbot closed 9 months ago
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1063/1.871116 is OK
- 10.1006/jcph.1997.5697 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6587/aaa373 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6587/ace993 is OK
- 10.1063/1.5122865 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.682 is OK
- 10.1063/1.4796190 is OK
- 10.1088/1361-6587/abad02 is OK
- 10.1063/1.871566 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/pe-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/4833, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.
If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.
You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:
``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Greif given-names: Robin orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4143-780X" doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10365012 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Greif given-names: Robin orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4143-780X" date-published: 2023-12-12 doi: 10.21105/joss.05959 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 92 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 5959 title: "HW2D: A reference implementation of the Hasegawa-Wakatani model for plasma turbulence in fusion reactors" type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05959" volume: 8 title: "HW2D: A reference implementation of the Hasegawa-Wakatani model for plasma turbulence in fusion reactors" ```
If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.
πππ π Toot for this paper π πππ
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
All looks good. Once again, thank you all for helping in the review process!
Congratulations @the-rccg on your article's publication in JOSS! Please consider signing up as a reviewer if you haven't already.
Many thanks to @archermarx and @Uddiptaatwork for reviewing this. We can't do it without your support.
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05959/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05959)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05959">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05959/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05959/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05959
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@the-rccg<!--end-author-handle-- (Robin Greif) Repository: https://github.com/the-rccg/hw2d Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: 1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@kyleniemeyer<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @archermarx, @Uddiptaatwork Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10365012
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@archermarx & @Uddiptaatwork, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @kyleniemeyer know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @archermarx
π Checklist for @Uddiptaatwork