openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
701 stars 36 forks source link

[REVIEW]: flowerMD: Flexible Library of Organic Workflows and Extensible Recipes for Molecular Dynamics #5989

Closed editorialbot closed 8 months ago

editorialbot commented 10 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@marjanalbouye<!--end-author-handle-- (Marjan Albooyeh) Repository: https://github.com/cmelab/flowerMD Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 1.1.1 Editor: !--editor-->@lucydot<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @LIVazquezS, @abhishektiwari Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10215501

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/75c5135b3e0eb1b561a89783ce949067"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/75c5135b3e0eb1b561a89783ce949067/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/75c5135b3e0eb1b561a89783ce949067/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/75c5135b3e0eb1b561a89783ce949067)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@csadorf & @LIVazquezS & @abhishektiwari, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @lucydot know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

πŸ“ Checklist for @abhishektiwari

πŸ“ Checklist for @LIVazquezS

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot set 1.1.1 as version

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Done! version is now 1.1.1

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 8 months ago

@marjanAlbouye as AEiC I will now help to process final steps. I have check the paper, this review, the archive link, and your repository. Most seems in order, however, I do have the below point that requires your attention.

On the paper:

marjanalbooyeh commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.

marjanalbooyeh commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

marjanalbooyeh commented 8 months ago

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Thanks for noticing the missing DOI. We fixed it, it should be good now.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot accept

editorialbot commented 8 months ago
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.

If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.

You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:

CITATION.cff

``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Albooyeh given-names: Marjan orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9565-3076" - family-names: Jones given-names: Chris orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-5274" - family-names: Barrett given-names: Rainier orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5728-9074" - family-names: Jankowski given-names: Eric orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-1410" contact: - family-names: Jankowski given-names: Eric orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-1410" doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10215501 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Albooyeh given-names: Marjan orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9565-3076" - family-names: Jones given-names: Chris orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-5274" - family-names: Barrett given-names: Rainier orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5728-9074" - family-names: Jankowski given-names: Eric orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-1410" date-published: 2023-12-15 doi: 10.21105/joss.05989 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 92 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 5989 title: "FlowerMD: Flexible Library of Organic Workflows and Extensible Recipes for Molecular Dynamics" type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05989" volume: 8 title: "FlowerMD: Flexible Library of Organic Workflows and Extensible Recipes for Molecular Dynamics" ```

If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.

Find more information on .cff files here and here.

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

🐘🐘🐘 πŸ‘‰ Toot for this paper πŸ‘ˆ 🐘🐘🐘

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

  1. Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/4844
  2. Wait five minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05989
  3. If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
  4. Party like you just published a paper! πŸŽ‰πŸŒˆπŸ¦„πŸ’ƒπŸ‘»πŸ€˜

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

marjanalbooyeh commented 8 months ago

On behalf of the authors of flowerMD, I would like to thank the reviewers and editors for all the helpful comments and suggestions. This was a great learning experience for us. Thank you!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot remove @csadorf as reviewer

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

@csadorf removed from the reviewers list!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot re-accept

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot reaccept

editorialbot commented 8 months ago
Rebuilding paper!
editorialbot commented 8 months ago

🌈 Paper updated!

New PDF and metadata files :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/4846

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 8 months ago

@marjanAlbouye congratulations on this JOSS publication! :christmas_tree: :gift:

Thanks for editing @lucydot! And a special thanks to the reviewers: @LIVazquezS, @abhishektiwari !

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05989/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05989)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05989">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05989/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05989/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05989

This is how it will look in your documentation:

DOI

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

lucydot commented 8 months ago

@csadorf removed from the reviewers list!

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, a quick note to say that @csadorf had to withdraw for personal reasons. They communicated this to me before the paper was in accepted for publication; I managed to drop the ball on it. Thanks for catching.