Closed editorialbot closed 8 months ago
@editorialbot set 1.1.1 as version
Done! version is now 1.1.1
@marjanAlbouye as AEiC I will now help to process final steps. I have check the paper, this review, the archive link, and your repository. Most seems in order, however, I do have the below point that requires your attention.
On the paper:
Eastman, P., Swails, J., Chodera, J. D., McGibbon, R. T., Zhao, Y., Beauchamp, K. A., Wang,
L.-P., Simmonett, A. C., Harrigan, M. P., Stern, C. D., & others. (2017). OpenMM
7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics. PLoS
Computational Biology, 13(7), e1005659.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Thanks for noticing the missing DOI. We fixed it, it should be good now.
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.
If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.
You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:
``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Albooyeh given-names: Marjan orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9565-3076" - family-names: Jones given-names: Chris orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-5274" - family-names: Barrett given-names: Rainier orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5728-9074" - family-names: Jankowski given-names: Eric orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-1410" contact: - family-names: Jankowski given-names: Eric orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-1410" doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10215501 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Albooyeh given-names: Marjan orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9565-3076" - family-names: Jones given-names: Chris orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-5274" - family-names: Barrett given-names: Rainier orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5728-9074" - family-names: Jankowski given-names: Eric orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-1410" date-published: 2023-12-15 doi: 10.21105/joss.05989 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 92 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 5989 title: "FlowerMD: Flexible Library of Organic Workflows and Extensible Recipes for Molecular Dynamics" type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05989" volume: 8 title: "FlowerMD: Flexible Library of Organic Workflows and Extensible Recipes for Molecular Dynamics" ```
If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.
πππ π Toot for this paper π πππ
π¨π¨π¨ THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! π¨π¨π¨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
On behalf of the authors of flowerMD, I would like to thank the reviewers and editors for all the helpful comments and suggestions. This was a great learning experience for us. Thank you!
@editorialbot remove @csadorf as reviewer
@csadorf removed from the reviewers list!
@editorialbot re-accept
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot reaccept
Rebuilding paper!
π Paper updated!
New PDF and metadata files :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/4846
@marjanAlbouye congratulations on this JOSS publication! :christmas_tree: :gift:
Thanks for editing @lucydot! And a special thanks to the reviewers: @LIVazquezS, @abhishektiwari !
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05989/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05989)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05989">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05989/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.05989/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05989
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
@csadorf removed from the reviewers list!
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, a quick note to say that @csadorf had to withdraw for personal reasons. They communicated this to me before the paper was in accepted for publication; I managed to drop the ball on it. Thanks for catching.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@marjanalbouye<!--end-author-handle-- (Marjan Albooyeh) Repository: https://github.com/cmelab/flowerMD Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 1.1.1 Editor: !--editor-->@lucydot<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @LIVazquezS, @abhishektiwari Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10215501
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@csadorf & @LIVazquezS & @abhishektiwari, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @lucydot know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @abhishektiwari
π Checklist for @LIVazquezS