search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
707 stars 37 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: SIRITVIS: Social Interaction Research Insights Topic Visualisation #5991

Closed editorialbot closed 8 months ago

editorialbot commented 10 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@CodeEagle22<!--end-author-handle-- (Sagar Narwade) Repository: https://github.com/CodeEagle22/SIRITVIS/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.1.3 Editor: !--editor-->@oliviaguest<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @n3mo, @cjbarrie Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b51be70e9634e45d8035ee20b6147d76"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b51be70e9634e45d8035ee20b6147d76/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b51be70e9634e45d8035ee20b6147d76/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b51be70e9634e45d8035ee20b6147d76)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @CodeEagle22. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@CodeEagle22 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 10 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 10 months ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (260.5 files/s, 56887.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           9            396            345           1445
XML                              1              0              0            450
Markdown                         2             83              0            179
TeX                              1             26              4            103
YAML                             1              8              0             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            14            513            349           2195
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 10 months ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1165

editorialbot commented 10 months ago

Failed to discover a valid open source license

editorialbot commented 10 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.21105/joss.02507 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.143 is OK
- 10.3389/frai.2020.00042 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-demos.31 may be a valid DOI for title: OCTIS: Comparing and Optimizing Topic Models is Simple!
- 10.1145/2484028.2484166 may be a valid DOI for title: Improving lda topic models for microblogs via tweet pooling and automatic labeling
- 10.4000/books.aaccademia.10863 may be a valid DOI for title: OCTIS 2.0: Optimizing and Comparing Topic Models in Italian Is Even Simpler!
- 10.3115/v1/w14-3110 may be a valid DOI for title: LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics
- 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550 may be a valid DOI for title: VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 10 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 10 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

TTLocVis: A Twitter Topic Location Visualization Package Submitting author: @xillig Handling editor: @trallard (Retired) Reviewers: @sara-02, @linuxscout, @aozorahime Similarity score: 0.8190

A News Verification Browser for the Detection of Clickbait, Satire, and Falsified News Submitting author: @VictoriaRubin Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @lrasmus, @CBenghi Similarity score: 0.8179

R-Opitools – An Opinion Analytical Tool for Big Digital Text Document (DTD) Submitting author: @MAnalytics Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active) Reviewers: @cjbarrie, @justinchuntingho, @jaeyk Similarity score: 0.8141

TraViA: a Traffic data Visualization and Annotation tool in Python Submitting author: @OlgerSiebinga Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @rusu24edward, @tomalrussell Similarity score: 0.8121

LISC: A Python Package for Scientific Literature Collection and Analysis Submitting author: @TomDonoghue Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @timClicks, @linuxscout Similarity score: 0.8119

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

CodeEagle22 commented 10 months ago

Failed to discover a valid open source license

MIT License got uploaded on root directory

oliviaguest commented 10 months ago

@CodeEagle22 can you take a look at the missing DOIs, please?

oliviaguest commented 10 months ago

@ajstewartlang is this up your street?

CodeEagle22 commented 10 months ago

@CodeEagle22 can you take a look at the missing DOIs, please?

Hey @oliviaguest, thank you for your attention to this matter; it's now resolved.

ajstewartlang commented 10 months ago

@ajstewartlang is this up your street?

Looks like an interesting submission but I'm at capacity currently I'm afraid.

xillig commented 9 months ago

Dear @oliviaguest,

is there any update with regards to our submission?

Best regards, Gillian

oliviaguest commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Assigned! @oliviaguest is now the editor

oliviaguest commented 8 months ago

@xillig I am sorry things are taking so long, I am wondering why we are so over-capacity at JOSS. I will address this by handling this myself. ☺️

oliviaguest commented 8 months ago

@cjbarrie @mkearney @n3mo @julianmcauley do any/all of you have the time/capacity to review this, please? 😊

n3mo commented 8 months ago

This would be my first time reviewing for the journal, but if you still need someone I would be happy to help.

cjbarrie commented 8 months ago

Hi All. Sorry for slowness. I'm happy to do this. One Q before I begin: not sure how I would go about testing the Twitter connection now the the API is paid?

oliviaguest commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot add @n3mo to reviewers

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

@n3mo added to the reviewers list!

oliviaguest commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot add @cjbarrie to reviewers

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

@cjbarrie added to the reviewers list!

oliviaguest commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6243.

julianmcauley commented 8 months ago

unsubscribe

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 08:38, The Open Journals editorial robot < @.***> wrote:

Closed #5991 https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5991 as completed.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5991#event-11539715274, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOYH4JDSWEEV7SRCHIM3ATYPKOR7AVCNFSM6AAAAAA6TB3Q32VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJRGUZTSNZRGUZDONA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

CodeEagle22 commented 8 months ago

Hi All. Sorry for slowness. I'm happy to do this. One Q before I begin: not sure how I would go about testing the Twitter connection now the the API is paid?

Hello @cjbarrie, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. In my previous assessment, the Twitter streaming feature's API was free and operational. However, the current cost of approximately $5000 per month as you mentioned for utilizing the API with multiple filters which unaffordable for me. I am unsure about your testing approach, but unless an alternative solution is identified, I may have to consider removing the reference to this feature from the paper.