[PRE REVIEW]: CM++ - A Meta-method for Well-Connected Community Detection

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@chackoge<!--end-author-handle-- (George Chacko) Repository: https://github.com/illinois-or-research-analytics/cm_pipeline.git Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v4.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@arfon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @LuisScoccola, @chryswoods Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/108cbf5184e97d60fbf8e8ee7757b67f"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/108cbf5184e97d60fbf8e8ee7757b67f/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/108cbf5184e97d60fbf8e8ee7757b67f/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/108cbf5184e97d60fbf8e8ee7757b67f)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @chackoge. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@chackoge if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.07 s (968.5 files/s, 80498.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          43            723            400           2831
JSON                            16              0              0            547
Markdown                         4            172              0            532
TeX                              1             27              0            345
R                                5             62             76            117
YAML                             2              1              4             64
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            71            985            480           4436
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 932

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z is OK
- 10.1162/qss_a_00184 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.0706851105 is OK
- 10.1038/s41567-022-01716-7 is OK
- 10.1016/j.dam.2021.08.032 is OK
- 10.1126/sciadv.1602548 is OK
- 10.1002/asi.22990 is OK
- 10.1002/asi.22748 is OK
- 10.1093/molbev/mst228 is OK
- 10.1038/nature03288 is OK
- 10.1145/1134271.1134277 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008239 is OK
- 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.122653799 is OK
- 10.1002/sam.10133 is OK
- 10.1109/ibigdelft.2018.8625349 is OK
- 10.1002/wics.1566 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1101/gr.1239303 may be a valid DOI for title: Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks

INVALID DOIs

- None

[arfon]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @arfon is now the editor

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Connectome Mapper 3: A Flexible and Open-Source Pipeline Software for Multiscale Multimodal Human Connectome Mapping Submitting author: @sebastientourbier Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @adbartni, @jsheunis Similarity score: 0.7946

PyClustering: Data Mining Library Submitting author: @annoviko Handling editor: @poulson (Retired) Reviewers: @adavidzh Similarity score: 0.7918

Histogram-weighted Networks for Feature Extraction, Connectivity and Advanced Analysis in Neuroscience Submitting author: @raamana Handling editor: @cMadan (Active) Reviewers: @oesteban Similarity score: 0.7893

fmcmc: A friendly MCMC framework Submitting author: @gvegayon Handling editor: @arokem (Retired) Reviewers: @fabian-s Similarity score: 0.7867

compareMCMCs: An R package for studying MCMC efficiency Submitting author: @perrydv Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active) Reviewers: @rowlandseymour, @tbrown122387 Similarity score: 0.7805

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[chackoge]

Thank you @arfon. In case it helps, I suggest tahirinadia and amarkos (I left the @ out) . I don't know either of them personally nor do I think there are any conflicts of interest.

[arfon]

@LuisScoccola @annoviko @tahirinadia @amarkos – :wave: would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is CM++ - A Meta-method for Well-Connected Community Detection

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Based on your experience, (and for some of you, past submissions to JOSS) we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out!

Many thanks Arfon

[LuisScoccola]

@arfon sorry for the slow response. I'm happy to do the review. I'll be able to start in about two weeks.

[arfon]

Amazing, thank you @LuisScoccola!

[arfon]

@editorialbot add @LuisScoccola as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@LuisScoccola added to the reviewers list!

[arfon]

@chryswoods @jakobbossek @volfpeter – :wave: would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is CM++ - A Meta-method for Well-Connected Community Detection

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Based on your experience, (and for some of you, past submissions to JOSS) we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out!

Many thanks Arfon

[volfpeter]

Hi @arfon for personal reasons, unfortunately I won't be able to spend time on it in the coming weeks.

[chryswoods]

@arfon - yes, I am happy to review :-)

[arfon]

@editorialbot add @chryswoods as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@chryswoods added to the reviewers list!

[arfon]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6073.

[arfon]

@LuisScoccola, @chryswoods, thanks for agreeing to review here. See you over in #6073 where the actual review will take place.