search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[REVIEW]: SCAS dashboard: A tool to intuitively and interactively analyze Slurm cluster usage #6017

Closed editorialbot closed 6 months ago

editorialbot commented 1 year ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@wathom<!--end-author-handle-- (Thomas W.) Repository: https://github.com/Bioinformatics-Munich/scas_dashboard Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@danielskatz<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @aturner-epcc, @phargogh Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.10064783

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c87682f0b4f5fa6e7615d5a5b16370f0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c87682f0b4f5fa6e7615d5a5b16370f0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c87682f0b4f5fa6e7615d5a5b16370f0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c87682f0b4f5fa6e7615d5a5b16370f0)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@aturner-epcc & @apjez & @verolero86, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @danielskatz know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

📝 Checklist for @aturner-epcc

editorialbot commented 6 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/10968987_3 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2015.68 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.00622 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: SLURM Dashboard
- No DOI given, and none found for title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Comp...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: shiny: Web Application Framework for R
- No DOI given, and none found for title: shinydashboard: Create Dashboards with ’Shiny’

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:wave: @openjournals/csism-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.

Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article

If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5340, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept

danielskatz commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot accept

editorialbot commented 6 months ago 
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.

If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.

You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:

CITATION.cff

``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Walzthoeni given-names: Thomas orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3995-709X" - family-names: Singiali given-names: Bom Bahadur - family-names: Rayner given-names: N. William orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-4792" - family-names: Casale given-names: Francesco Paolo - family-names: Feest given-names: Christoph orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0772-7267" - family-names: Marr given-names: Carsten orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-4552" - family-names: Wachsmann given-names: Alf orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7736-3059" contact: - family-names: Walzthoeni given-names: Thomas orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3995-709X" doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10064783 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Walzthoeni given-names: Thomas orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3995-709X" - family-names: Singiali given-names: Bom Bahadur - family-names: Rayner given-names: N. William orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-4792" - family-names: Casale given-names: Francesco Paolo - family-names: Feest given-names: Christoph orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0772-7267" - family-names: Marr given-names: Carsten orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-4552" - family-names: Wachsmann given-names: Alf orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7736-3059" date-published: 2024-05-10 doi: 10.21105/joss.06017 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 97 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 6017 title: "SCAS dashboard: A tool to intuitively and interactively analyze Slurm cluster usage" type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06017" volume: 9 title: "SCAS dashboard: A tool to intuitively and interactively analyze Slurm cluster usage" ```

If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.

Find more information on .cff files here and here.

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

🐘🐘🐘 👉 Toot for this paper 👈 🐘🐘🐘

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

  1. Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5341
  2. Wait five minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06017
  3. If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
  4. Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

danielskatz commented 6 months ago

Congratulations to @wathom (Thomas W.) and co-authors on your publication!!

And thanks to @aturner-epcc and @phargogh for reviewing this work! JOSS depends on volunteers and wouldn't be successful without your efforts

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06017/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06017)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06017">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06017/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06017/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06017

This is how it will look in your documentation:

DOI

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

wathom commented 6 months ago

Great, many thanks to the editor @danielskatz and the reviewers @aturner-epcc and @phargogh

arfon commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot reaccept

(Nothing to see here, just re-accepting this to make sure the JATS output are in the correct format)

editorialbot commented 6 months ago 
Rebuilding paper!
editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:warning: Couldn't update published paper. An error happened.