Open editorialbot opened 10 months ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.18 s (1865.1 files/s, 168208.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 110 2298 979 8401
PO File 12 2117 2652 5211
HTML 123 97 1 3933
Markdown 40 767 0 1455
YAML 28 37 9 991
JSON 2 0 0 450
Sass 10 26 35 138
Dockerfile 1 14 13 25
Bourne Shell 2 0 1 20
SVG 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 329 5356 3690 20625
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 886
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Fyi
I have not confirmed, but now you have assigned me as reviewer, I have no other option than to do the review ππ
Will try to do the review in the next few weeks (mind that these are my most busy teaching weeks).
Fyi
I have not confirmed, but now you have assigned me as reviewer, I have no other option than to do the review ππ
Will try to do the review in the next few weeks (mind that these are my most busy teaching weeks).
Thanks @pmkruyen I do appreciate it - if you need a little extra time, that is fine.
Below you will find some of my notes on the article and on the repository documentation. I am currently without a functioning Qualtrics account, something I hope my institution's IT department will sort out in the next couple of weeks. Once I have it, I will move forward with installing and testing WPSS.
Notes on the article:
Notes on the documentation:
Hello! I started the review early November, asked a basic question on the 'issue' page of the repository to login. So far, I haven't heard anything back from the authors.
When I heard back I will continue my review mid January; unfortunately I won't have access to Qualtrics from late January onwards making it impossible (I assume) to finish the review then (ergo: I need to step back at the end of next month.
Thanks for the help.
@pmkruyen Thanks for letting me know. @tvi-cdsp and @CDSP-SCPO could you respond please (noting the constraint here)?
:wave: @joaojcorreia @pmkruyen I've been trying to contact @tvi-cdsp via GH and via email (using a couple of different addresses) asking them to reply to the queries above. So far I haven't had any response. I'll give it another few weeks - if I don't hear back soon, I'll have to reject this submission unfortunately.
Hello, i apologise for the long delay in our response, The team member in charge of monitoring the GH repo left our team and no one else here was watching it, also my own work Github account was set up incorrectly and i did not receive any notifications until the email to info.cdsp... All of this is hopefully fixed now, and @pmkruyen query should also be answered in our github issues.
Again, sorry for the delay, the holiday season did not help either here.
Dear all,
I understand the situation, but because of change in positions (and employer), I can no longer access Qualtrics. I have to withdraw from the review. Hope you find another reviewer. I am very sorry for this.
Kind regards, Peter
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 5:38β―PM Tom Villette @.***> wrote:
Hello, i apologise for the long delay in our response, The team member in charge of monitoring the GH repo left our team and no one else here was watching it, also my own work Github account was set up incorrectly and i did not receive any notifications until the email to info.cdsp... All of this is hopefully fixed now, and @pmkruyen https://github.com/pmkruyen query should also be answered in our github issues.
Again, sorry for the delay, the holiday season did not help either here.
β Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6022#issuecomment-1906465432, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE2FMK2S5U32ASADFVPSYQDYP7RQ7AVCNFSM6AAAAAA67IIEP6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMBWGQ3DKNBTGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Thanks for letting us know, Peter (@pmkruyen). I appreciate the time you spent reviewing this submission.
@editorialbot remove @pmkruyen from reviewers
@pmkruyen removed from the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @stain as reviewer
@stain added to the reviewers list!
:wave: @stain and @joaojcorreia how are your reviews of this submission going?
Hello, i apologise for the long delay in our response, The team member in charge of monitoring the GH repo left our team and no one else here was watching it, also my own work Github account was set up incorrectly and i did not receive any notifications until the email to info.cdsp... All of this is hopefully fixed now, and @pmkruyen query should also be answered in our github issues.
Again, sorry for the delay, the holiday season did not help either here.
:wave: @tvi-cdsp Can I check that the issues that @joaojcorreia mentioned above have been addressed?
:wave: @tvi-cdsp could you respond to the issue please? I've also tagged you in another repo.
@gmi-cdsp @tvi-cdsp tagging you both to see if you can help with the above. A response by the end of August would be appreciated.
π @ajstewartlang. Sorry for the delay, my two colleagues mentioned above are no longer part of the team, so I'm taking over this subject. I've just pushed the modifications requested by @joaojcorreia , and I hope you'll find them satisfactory. I'm now available to finalize the publication of this software paper.
π @ajstewartlang. Sorry for the delay, my two colleagues mentioned above are no longer part of the team, so I'm taking over this subject. I've just pushed the modifications requested by @joaojcorreia , and I hope you'll find them satisfactory. I'm now available to finalize the publication of this software paper.
Many thanks for picking this up @Tepau ! @joaojcorreia could you take a look at the modifications please? @stain do you have any issues to raise?
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@tvi-cdsp<!--end-author-handle-- (Tom Villette) Repository: https://github.com/CDSP-SCPO/WPSS-for-ESS-webpanel Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: 2023-06-21 Editor: !--editor-->@ajstewartlang<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @joaojcorreia, @stain Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@joaojcorreia & @pmkruyen, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @ajstewartlang know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @joaojcorreia
π Checklist for @stain