Closed editorialbot closed 7 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.37 s (589.0 files/s, 155196.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 101 7101 6646 30019
SVG 4 0 529 2836
reStructuredText 63 1276 1312 1727
YAML 19 61 42 806
Markdown 12 123 0 316
Jupyter Notebook 6 0 3034 286
JSON 6 12 0 253
DOS Batch 1 29 1 212
make 1 28 6 143
TeX 1 8 0 83
TOML 2 6 0 21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 216 8644 11570 36702
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1200
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.softx.2020.100506 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jelechem.2023.117627 is OK
- 10.3390/batteries9050251 is OK
- 10.1002/celc.202001108 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-019-51324-4 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Hello @jepegit, thanks for your submission to JOSS. Unfortunately, we do not have an editor available in this area at the moment, so I have to put your submission in our waitlist until someone frees up. In the meantime, any reviewer suggestions would be welcome.
Hi @kyleniemeyer,
Thanks. I can suggest the following reviewers:
@mdmurbach @EricaEgg
@editorialbot add @mbarzegary as editor
@mbarzegary, thanks for volunteering to edit this submission!
Assigned! @mbarzegary is now the editor
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
DiffCapAnalyzer: A Python Package for Quantitative Analysis of Total Differential Capacity Data
Submitting author: @nicolet5
Handling editor: @jgostick (Active)
Reviewers: @yangbai90, @WardLT
Similarity score: 0.8311
liionpack: A Python package for simulating packs of batteries with PyBaMM
Submitting author: @TomTranter
Handling editor: @timtroendle (Active)
Reviewers: @EricaEgg, @mefuller, @yangbai90
Similarity score: 0.8192
polypy - Analysis Tools for Solid State Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Trajectories
Submitting author: @symmy596
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @hmacdope, @lscalfi
Similarity score: 0.8184
CellPyLib: A Python Library for working with Cellular Automata
Submitting author: @lantunes
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @blsqr, @szhorvat
Similarity score: 0.8175
impedance.py: A Python package for electrochemical impedance analysis
Submitting author: @mdmurbach
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @ma-sadeghi, @EricaEgg
Similarity score: 0.8036
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Hi @EricaEgg and @mdmurbach👋 Considering your expertise and previous experience on reviewing for JOSS, would any of you be willing to review this submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06043/joss.06043/10.21105.joss.06043.pdf Software: https://github.com/jepegit/cellpy
Hi @MaximevdHeijden 👋 Considering your field of expertise, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06043/joss.06043/10.21105.joss.06043.pdf Software: https://github.com/jepegit/cellpy
Hi @mbarzegary, I would gladly review this submission for JOSS.
@editorialbot add @MaximevdHeijden as reviewer
@MaximevdHeijden added to the reviewers list!
Hi @sarahalamdari, @nicolet5, @TomTranter, @mdmurbach 👋 Considering that you have already published your software in JOSS, would any of you be willing to review this submission? As you know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06043/joss.06043/10.21105.joss.06043.pdf Software: https://github.com/jepegit/cellpy
Hi @ma-sadeghi, @yangbai90 and @WardLT 👋 Considering that you have already reviewed for JOSS, would any of you be willing to review this submission? As you know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06043/joss.06043/10.21105.joss.06043.pdf Software: https://github.com/jepegit/cellpy
Hi, yes I am happy to review this submission. Looks right up my street
@editorialbot add @TomTranter as reviewer
@TomTranter added to the reviewers list!
@ma-sadeghi, @yangbai90, @WardLT, @sarahalamdari, @nicolet5 I'll start the review, but you can still inform me if any of you would be willing to join the reviewers of this submission.
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6236.
Hi @mbarzegary. Sure, I'd be happy to review this submission.
Sorry for the delay, I can join in the review.
@WardLT Thank you for the reply. Since we have already 3 reviewers on this submission, I can assign you to another relevant one (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6218) if you believe it fits your expertise.
@WardLT Thank you for the reply. Since we have already 3 reviewers on this submission, I can assign you to another relevant one (#6218) if you believe it fits your expertise.
Sorry, that one is a little outside of what I know well. Electronic and Phonon structures are not my expertise. Maybe @dyllamt
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@jepegit<!--end-author-handle-- (Jan Petter Maehlen) Repository: https://github.com/jepegit/cellpy Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0post4 Editor: !--editor-->@mbarzegary<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @MaximevdHeijden, @TomTranter Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jepegit. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@jepegit if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: