openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
704 stars 37 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: G'MIC: An Open-Source Self-Extending Framework for Image Processing #6056

Closed editorialbot closed 5 months ago

editorialbot commented 10 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@dtschump<!--end-author-handle-- (David Tschumperlé) Repository: https://github.com/GreycLab/gmic Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: 3.3.2 Editor: !--editor-->@gkthiruvathukal<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @jamesrhester, @Smattr, @drj11 Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3a7bf663fe762a18b348e74ddfc568c8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3a7bf663fe762a18b348e74ddfc568c8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3a7bf663fe762a18b348e74ddfc568c8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3a7bf663fe762a18b348e74ddfc568c8)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dtschump. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@dtschump if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Hello @gkthiruvathukal, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Reject paper
@editorialbot reject

# Withdraw paper
@editorialbot withdraw

# Invite an editor to edit a submission (sending them an email)
@editorialbot invite @(.*) as editor

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Accept and publish the paper
@editorialbot accept

# Update data on an accepted/published paper
@editorialbot reaccept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review
gkthiruvathukal commented 9 months ago

@editorialbot list reviewers

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Please log in the JOSS Reviewers site to search through the list of current reviewers.

gkthiruvathukal commented 9 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GEMMI: A library for structural biology Submitting author: @wojdyr Handling editor: @kellyrowland (Active) Reviewers: @jamesrhester, @dominiquesydow Similarity score: 0.8250

GAMA: Genetic Automated Machine learning Assistant Submitting author: @PGijsbers Handling editor: @arokem (Retired) Reviewers: @jsgalan Similarity score: 0.8188

GNU Data Language 1.0: a free/libre and open-source drop-in replacement for IDL/PV-WAVE Submitting author: @pjb7687 Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active) Reviewers: @mgalloy, @mohawk2 Similarity score: 0.8151

GPP, the Generic Preprocessor Submitting author: @Logological Handling editor: @gkthiruvathukal (Active) Reviewers: @Smattr, @drj11 Similarity score: 0.8146

imager: an R package for image processing based on CImg Submitting author: @dahtah Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @jeroen Similarity score: 0.8128

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

gkthiruvathukal commented 9 months ago

@jeroen Are you willing to contribute a review for this JOSS submission?

gkthiruvathukal commented 9 months ago

@mohawk2 Are you willing to contribute a review for this JOSS submission? (I need two reviewers.)

gkthiruvathukal commented 9 months ago

@jsgalan Are you willing to contribute a review for this JOSS submission?

gkthiruvathukal commented 8 months ago

@danielskatz Sorry, but I'm having trouble getting reviewers. We may have to pause for a bit. I'm going to try two more.

gkthiruvathukal commented 8 months ago

@jamesrhester and @dominiquesydow: are either or both of you willing to review this JOSS submission?

jamesrhester commented 8 months ago

Happy to review this, bearing in mind that I'm not an image processing expert, have just messed around a bit with image processing tools.

dtschump commented 8 months ago

I'm not sure if I can help at this point, but feel free to ask me any questions if any.

dominiquesydow commented 8 months ago

Hi @gkthiruvathukal, my sincere apologies, I am afraid this topic is too far outside of my expertise to be a useful reviewer.

gkthiruvathukal commented 8 months ago

@jamesrhester It isn't required to have deep expertise to review JOSS submissions. Having prior experience with image processing tools is a plus. The goal is to evaluate that the software does what the authors say it does and meets the JOSS requirements. I'm going to go ahead and assign you and see if I can find a second reviewer in the meantime.

gkthiruvathukal commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot add @jamesrhester as reviewer

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

@jamesrhester added to the reviewers list!

gkthiruvathukal commented 8 months ago

@jsgalan are you willing to review this JOSS submission?

jamesrhester commented 7 months ago

Just to note, I don't believe I can start the review until all reviewers are in place and a new issue is created.

danielskatz commented 7 months ago

👋 @gkthiruvathukal - this submission seems stuck - can you help move it forward?

gkthiruvathukal commented 7 months ago

@danielskatz Apologies for the delays on my end. The past few weeks have been super busy with my chairperson duties. I'll try to keep this moving.

Working to get a second reviewer now.

gkthiruvathukal commented 7 months ago

@Smattr Would you be willing to help with this JOSS submission? I need a second reviewer in order to proceed with review.

danielskatz commented 7 months ago

@gkthiruvathukal - thanks. We usually recommend to editors that they ask a few different potential reviewers at a time, rather than doing it serially, if possible.

gkthiruvathukal commented 7 months ago

@danielskatz See above! I did ask multiple. One already responded in the affirmative. (Thanks, @jamesrhester!)

Smattr commented 6 months ago

Thanks for considering me, but unfortunately my time’s full for the next little while. If you can’t find anyone else, I should have some time in May.

gkthiruvathukal commented 6 months ago

@Smattr Can I go ahead and add you? I'm willing to work with your timeframe. I'd rather get things moving than not have them moving at all.

drj11 commented 6 months ago

i can review. I'm not exactly expert, but i have written the pure-Python PNG module PyPNG https://gitlab.com/drj11/pypng

danielskatz commented 5 months ago

@gkthiruvathukal - it seems like you can add @drj11 and @Smattr , as we're getting close to May, and then start the review?

gkthiruvathukal commented 5 months ago

@danielskatz Sorry for the delay on this one. Got things going and then hit a wall of work (again).

gkthiruvathukal commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot add @drj11

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

gkthiruvathukal commented 5 months ago

@Smattr It is almost May, so I am going to add you! Please take the time you need. @drj11 Thank you for also being willing!

gkthiruvathukal commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot add @Smattr as reviewer

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

@Smattr added to the reviewers list!

gkthiruvathukal commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot add @drj11 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

@drj11 added to the reviewers list!

gkthiruvathukal commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6618.