search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: node-carbon: A Node Package for Measuring Carbon Footprints #6091

Closed editorialbot closed 11 months ago

editorialbot commented 11 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@sumn2u<!--end-author-handle-- (Suman Kunwar) Repository: https://github.com/sumn2u/node-carbon Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.0.5 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2319047071d2f0e14401ca3ced73c0c0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2319047071d2f0e14401ca3ced73c0c0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2319047071d2f0e14401ca3ced73c0c0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2319047071d2f0e14401ca3ced73c0c0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sumn2u. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@sumn2u if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 11 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1787/a60abbf2-en is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
danielskatz commented 11 months ago

👋 @sumn2u - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. We have also decided that this submission is not research software as defined by JOSS. This does not mean that it is not software that is useful in research, but just that JOSS does not consider it in scope for review as research software.

Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.

danielskatz commented 11 months ago

@editorialbot reject

editorialbot commented 11 months ago

Paper rejected.