Closed editorialbot closed 8 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.06 s (1118.9 files/s, 132383.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG 9 6 39 5883
Python 26 307 430 826
Markdown 24 103 0 288
YAML 7 32 4 237
HTML 2 34 2 211
TeX 1 3 0 44
TOML 1 9 3 39
JavaScript 1 1 0 15
CSS 1 0 0 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 72 495 478 7546
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1145/2833157.2833162 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Wordcount for paper.md
is 500
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Author (Jakob Hærvig) is missing affiliation.
@jakobhaervig - thanks for your submission.
Note that your paper does not compile. Please follow the example paper and note that you can click on the error above to find out more about it. Please feel free to make changes to your .md file, then use the command @editorialbot generate pdf
to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.
I think this should be in another track, if it goes forward. It's now in 1) Computer science, Information Science, and Mathematics, and the two options that seem most appropriate to me are 2) Biomedical Engineering, Biosciences, Chemistry, and Materials or 3) Physics and Engineering. Can you let me know which of these you think best fits the work?
Due to the relatively small amount of code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. You should hear back in a week or so.
@editorialbot query scope
Submission flagged for editorial review.
@editorialbot generate pdf
Thanks for getting back @danielskatz. I now updated the paper with affiliation and ensured it compiles correctly using this action: https://github.com/openjournals/openjournals-draft-action
Thanks for pointing out the wrong track. It belongs in track 3: Physics and Engineering.
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@jakobhaervig - Thanks. I've moved the submission into the correct track, and started the scope review, which @openjournals/pe-eics will handle from here.
Hi @jakobhaervig, thanks for your patience. We're going to proceed with reviewing this - just need to find an editor now.
@jakobhaervig unfortunately, we don't have any editors available at the moment to handle this. I'll get back to you soon, though.
@editorialbot invite @AdamRJensen as editor
Hi @AdamRJensen, could you also take this one?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot assign @AdamRJensen as editor
Assigned! @AdamRJensen is now the editor
@jakobhaervig could you search the list of people that have already agreed to review and and see if any are suitable for reviewing this submission? If so, please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @).
:wave: @hewei8622, @mdoucet, I see that you both are signed up as JOSS reviewers with the tag "energy storage" and was wondering if any of you be available to review this submission?
👋 @baperry2, @hewei8622, and @mdoucet, I see that you are signed up as JOSS reviewers and was wondering if any of you be available to review this submission?
@AdamRJensen, thanks for finding suitable reviewers. Let me know if I can do anything to speed up the process.
@AdamRJensen I am available to be a reviewer for this submission.
@editorialbot add @baperry2 as reviewer
@baperry2 added to the reviewers list!
👋 @hewei8622 and @mdoucet I just wanted to check again if you are available to review this submission? If you're busy at the moment, that's of course no problem.
@jakobhaervig could you please suggest some additional potential reviewers (comment with their usernames without tagging them, i.e., remove the @ before their GH usernames).
@AdamRJensen, I searched the list of potential reviewers and found ronshnapp, dankusanovic and GregorBecker.
Thanks, Jakob
👋 @ronshnapp and @dankusanovic, I see that you are signed up as JOSS reviewers and was wondering if any of you be available to review this submission?
Hi, I am happy to be a reviewer of this paper.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:10 AM Adam R. Jensen @.***> wrote:
👋 @hewei8622 https://github.com/hewei8622 and @mdoucet https://github.com/mdoucet I just wanted to check again if you are available to review this submission? If you're busy at the moment, that's of course no problem.
@jakobhaervig https://github.com/jakobhaervig could you please suggest some additional potential reviewers (comment with their usernames without tagging them, i.e., remove the @ before their GH usernames).
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6128#issuecomment-1960546019, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AECPREEXV2FEO7FEA43WW2DYU7M6BAVCNFSM6AAAAABAMWFSKCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNRQGU2DMMBRHE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@editorialbot add @hewei8622 as reviewer
@hewei8622 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6411.
Hello Adam,
Apologies but I am totally booked these days, so I'll have to pass on this one.
Best, Ron
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 1:39 AM Adam R. Jensen @.***> wrote:
👋 @ronshnapp https://github.com/ronshnapp and @dankusanovic https://github.com/dankusanovic, I see that you are signed up as JOSS reviewers and was wondering if any of you be available to review this submission?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6128#issuecomment-1962138873, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIDS3TTSGG3BI4F3DX6HESTYVESCDAVCNFSM6AAAAABAMWFSKCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNRSGEZTQOBXGM . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Dr. Ron Shnapp, Senior Lecturer of Mechanical Engineering, Ben Gurion University of the Negev Soref building, 325, POB 653, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@jakobhaervig<!--end-author-handle-- (Jakob Hærvig) Repository: https://github.com/OpenTerrace/openterrace-python Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): development Version: v0.0.8 Editor: !--editor-->@AdamRJensen<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @baperry2, @hewei8622 Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jakobhaervig. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@jakobhaervig if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: