Closed editorialbot closed 5 months ago
@mmore500 FYI, I haven't had any luck with my attempt to reach potential reviewers (not in the JOSS's list). I will see if I can suggest some other people from the list.
sounds good! Thanks for the legwork here.
I made another pass through the JOSS directory for potential good match reviewers.
Some that jumped out at me:
I sent a message in the co author chat to ask for additional potential reviewers. Will follow up here with that if any are suggested.
@jarrah42 and @GaurangTandon would any of you be interested in reviewing this article?
Thanks @mahfuz05062 for the invitation. Sadly I'm quite busy for the next couple of weeks, so I won't be able to review the paper.
@mahfuz05062 – as it's taken a while here, it looks like @LTLA and @bramvandijk88 could be good candidates here (i.e., they said they would be able to complete reviews by mid-late April).
Yes, if I can review this after April 13th, I’d be happy to do it.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 10:16, Arfon Smith @.***> wrote:
@mahfuz05062 https://github.com/mahfuz05062 – as it's taken a while here, it looks like @LTLA https://github.com/LTLA and @bramvandijk88 https://github.com/bramvandijk88 could be good candidates here (i.e., they said they would be able to complete reviews by mid-late April).
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6151#issuecomment-2016745157, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACU6AQBIKPNO4BZOTAO43ETYZ2KXPAVCNFSM6AAAAABAVQF4HOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMJWG42DKMJVG4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Thanks @arfon. That's what I was thinking too! Once @LTLA confirms, we can complete the pre-review process.
Hi @LTLA, are you still available to review this in April?
Sorry just got back from vacation. Will need a few weeks to pick up pieces at work, so can start mid-April. Scanning the repo, it looks like a lot of stuff, so this might take a while.
Thank you! Let's aim for a start in mid-April then. I will start the review process soon.
Since it's almost mid-April, I am starting the review process.
@editorialbot start review
Can't start a review without reviewers
@editorialbot add @LTLA as reviewer
@LTLA added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot @bramvandijk88 as reviewer
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot add @bramvandijk88 as reviewer
@bramvandijk88 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6617.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mmore500<!--end-author-handle-- (Matthew Andres Moreno) Repository: https://github.com/devosoft/Empirical/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@mahfuz05062<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @LTLA, @bramvandijk88 Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mmore500. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@mmore500 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: