Closed editorialbot closed 3 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.44 s (321.4 files/s, 27480.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG 6 0 15 3882
Markdown 43 973 0 1861
Python 44 1084 1832 1703
HTML 39 0 0 539
YAML 8 30 39 190
TeX 1 7 0 59
JSON 1 0 0 8
TOML 1 0 0 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 143 2094 1886 8248
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1209
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1039/c4an01061b may be a valid DOI for title: Baseline correction using asymmetrically reweighted penalized least squares smoothing
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27586 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2009.07.007 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.116045 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
ChemPy: A package useful for chemistry written in Python
Submitting author: @bjodah
Handling editor: @kyleniemeyer (Active)
Reviewers: @bryanwweber
Similarity score: 0.8299
PiSCAT: A Python Package for Interferometric Scattering Microscopy
Submitting author: @po60nani
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @ziatdinovmax, @aquilesC
Similarity score: 0.8233
Kinetics Toolkit: An Open-Source Python Package to Facilitate Research in Biomechanics
Submitting author: @felixchenier
Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired)
Reviewers: @alcantarar, @melund
Similarity score: 0.8220
MSMetaEnhancer: A Python package for mass spectra metadata annotation
Submitting author: @hechth
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @marshallmcdonnell, @chryswoods
Similarity score: 0.8202
Museo ToolBox: A Python library for remote sensing including a new way to handle rasters.
Submitting author: @nkarasiak
Handling editor: @kbarnhart (Retired)
Reviewers: @cmillion, @mollenburger
Similarity score: 0.8174
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Hi! Thanks for the fast answer :smile: I have checked the reviewers list, and I think the following reviewers can be suitable for the submission (not necessarily in this order).
Submitting author: @paucablop (Pau Cabaneros López) Repository: https://github.com/paucablop/chemotools Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.3 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb/status.svg"></a> Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1ea3dd0ed0e9f8e3de070d884dc45ddb)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @paucablop. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@paucablop if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot invite @bmcfee as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot add @bmcfee as editor
Assigned! @bmcfee is now the editor
:wave: I'll get on the search for reviewers!
@bmcfee any luck finding/contacting reviewers?
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman no nibbles in the first couple of volleys, but I'm still at it.
Just updating that the last few rounds did not produce any nibbles either. Launching another one today. :crossed_fingers:
Awesome! Thanks for the work! 💪
@bmcfee how are you getting on finding reviewers? Let us know if you need help, or if we should ask the other editorial board members for help too.
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Still at it - did not get any hits with the usual strategies (past reviewers of similar projects) and have begun asking authors of similar projects, while avoiding those currently in review. No positive results as of yet.
Since this isn't quite my area, suggestions from the board would be most welcome!
@editorialbot add @vinayak2019 as reviewer
@vinayak2019 added to the reviewers list!
Just updating that reviewer search is still ongoing here - no bites in the last few volleys.
@editorialbot add @Kastakin as reviewer
@Kastakin added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6802.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@paucablop<!--end-author-handle-- (Pau Cabaneros López) Repository: https://github.com/paucablop/chemotools Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.3 Editor: !--editor-->@bmcfee<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @vinayak2019, @Kastakin Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @paucablop. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@paucablop if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: