Closed editorialbot closed 8 months ago
editorialbot
commented
8 months ago Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commandsFor example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdfSoftware report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.01 s (419.0 files/s, 129482.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 1 245 333 548
TeX 1 30 0 239
Markdown 2 24 0 103
YAML 1 1 4 18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 5 300 337 908
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repositoryWordcount for paper.md is 1276
editorialbot
commented
8 months ago Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102105 may be a valid DOI for title: Market reactions to acquisition announcements: The importance of signaling ‘why’ and ‘where’
- 10.1177/1476127017701076 may be a valid DOI for title: Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings
- 10.2139/ssrn.3204621 may be a valid DOI for title: What does it mean when managers talk about trust?
- 10.5465/amj.2013.0663 may be a valid DOI for title: Fuzzy logic and the market: A configurational approach to investor perceptions of acquisition announcements
- 10.1002/smj.2977 may be a valid DOI for title: The ethnic migrant inventor effect: Codification and recombination of knowledge across borders
- 10.1007/s11142-014-9309-4 may be a valid DOI for title: The effect of manager-specific optimism on the tone of earnings conference calls
- 10.5465/amj.2017.0158 may be a valid DOI for title: Impression offsetting as an early warning signal of low CEO confidence in acquisitions
- 10.5465/amj.2013.0377 may be a valid DOI for title: Motivated to acquire? The impact of CEO regulatory focus on firm acquisitions
- 10.5465/amj.2013.0288 may be a valid DOI for title: Ready, AIM, acquire: Impression offsetting and acquisitions
- 10.5465/amj.2019.0711 may be a valid DOI for title: The impact of executive verbal communication on the convergence of investors’ opinions
- 10.1002/smj.3023 may be a valid DOI for title: Measuring CEO personality: Developing, validating, and testing a linguistic tool
- 10.2139/ssrn.933100 may be a valid DOI for title: Are investors influenced by how earnings press releases are written?
- 10.5465/amj.2016.0626 may be a valid DOI for title: Silver bullet or ricochet? CEOs’ use of metaphorical communication and infomediaries’ evaluations
- 10.2469/dig.v41.n2.20 may be a valid DOI for title: When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10‐Ks
- 10.1177/0001839217712240 may be a valid DOI for title: The acquisitive nature of extraverted CEOs
- 10.1002/smj.3441 may be a valid DOI for title: Using supervised machine learning for large‐scale classification in management research: The case for identifying artificial intelligence patents
- 10.1002/smj.2733 may be a valid DOI for title: Give it to us straight (most of the time): Top managers’ use of concrete language and its effect on investor reactions
- 10.2139/ssrn.4357849 may be a valid DOI for title: Not like the rest of us? How CEO celebrity affects quarterly earnings call language
- 10.1177/0149206319886908 may be a valid DOI for title: The Pre-Deal Phase of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda
- 10.1109/cict.2015.101 may be a valid DOI for title: Research of text categorization model based on random forests
- 10.1177/0001839214554989 may be a valid DOI for title: CEO narcissism and the impact of prior board experience on corporate strategy
INVALID DOIs
- None:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf.
arfon
commented
8 months ago @editorialbot query scope
@jonasroettger – due to the relatively small size of this code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. We should get back to you sometime next week. If you want to fix the DOIs (noting that @editorialbot's suggestions are not always right), you can, then use the following commands (one at a time, as the first line of a new comment) to regenerate the PDF and check the references.
@editorialbot generate pdf @editorialbot check references
editorialbot
commented
8 months ago Submission flagged for editorial review.
arfon
commented
8 months ago @editorialbot reject
@jonasroettger - thanks for your submission to JOSS. Unfortunately, after review by the JOSS editorial team we've determined that this submission doesn't meet our substantial scholarly effort criterion.
One possible alternative to JOSS is to follow GitHub's guide on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.
editorialbot
commented
8 months ago Paper rejected.
jonasroettger
commented
8 months ago Dear Arfon,
Thanks for coming back to me so quickly.
Is there any chance I could get some information on which parts of the substantial scholarly effort my submission did not meet?
Age of software (is this a well-established software project) / length of commit history.
Number of commits.
Number of authors.
Total lines of code (LOC). Submissions under 1000 LOC will usually be flagged, those under 300 LOC will be desk rejected.
Whether the software has already been cited in academic papers.
Whether the software is sufficiently useful that it is likely to be cited by your peer group.
Best,
Jonas
From: Arfon Smith @.> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2024 9:57 PM To: openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc: Jonas Röttger @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: DisclosuR: R Package for Processing Firm Press Releases and Earnings Calls from Nexis Uni (Issue #6192)
@editorialbot https://github.com/editorialbot reject
@jonasroettger https://github.com/jonasroettger - thanks for your submission to JOSS. Unfortunately, after review by the JOSS editorial team we've determined that this submission doesn't meet our substantial scholarly effort https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#substantial-scholarly-effort criterion.
One possible alternative to JOSS is to follow GitHub's guide https://guides.github.com/activities/citable-code/ on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6192#issuecomment-1883779537 , or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHR5BMAGBGBBIEM4GBZZ6PLYNWVITAVCNFSM6AAAAABBTJPEA6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQOBTG43TSNJTG4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned. https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AHR5BMG7ZX4DCXYYBHDRJX3YNWVITA5CNFSM6AAAAABBTJPEA6WGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTTQJAY5C.gif Message ID: @. @.> >
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@jonasroettger<!--end-author-handle-- (Jonas Röttger) Repository: https://github.com/jonasroettger/disclosuR Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.6.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jonasroettger. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@jonasroettger if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: