[PRE REVIEW]: HofstadterTools: A Python package for analyzing the Hofstadter model

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@bartandrews@RMeli<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @AlexBuccheri, @katherineding Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3cd996ede201132d57ab9c9a7cc56955"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3cd996ede201132d57ab9c9a7cc56955/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3cd996ede201132d57ab9c9a7cc56955/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3cd996ede201132d57ab9c9a7cc56955)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @bartandrews. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@bartandrews if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (882.3 files/s, 126387.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          18            546            781           1652
TeX                              2            100              0           1376
YAML                             6             10              8            599
reStructuredText                14            300            451            262
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0            476            122
CSS                              3              8             14             64
Markdown                         1             15              0             37
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            48            991           1738           4147
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 969

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1088/0370-1298/68/10/304 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.2239 is OK
- 10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.5 is OK
- 10.1038/s41699-023-00378-0 is OK
- 10.1088/0034-4885/77/12/126401 is OK
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.011004 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.166402 is OK
- 10.1088/1367-2630/ac4126 is OK
- 10.1063/1.1611351 is OK
- 10.1142/9781848160224_0014 is OK
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015005 is OK
- 10.1038/nature12186 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185301 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.235312 is OK
- 10.1038/ncomms9629 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.075132 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.184501 is OK
- 10.1038/s42005-019-0151-7 is OK
- 10.1007/BF01342591 is OK
- 10.1038/nature25011 is OK
- 10.1126/science.aao1401 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.165150 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-022-05576-2 is OK
- 10.1007/s10955-014-0992-0 is OK
- 10.1088/0256-307X/26/12/123701 is OK
- 10.1088/1751-8113/47/18/185202 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.246403 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/b978-0-323-90800-9.00261-4 may be a valid DOI for title: The Ten Martini Problem
- 10.1103/physrevb.108.205144 may be a valid DOI for title: Vortexability: A Unifying Criterion for Ideal Fractional Chern Insulators

INVALID DOIs

- None

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Author (Bartholomew Andrews) is missing affiliation.

kyleniemeyer commented 6 months ago

Hello @bartandrews, could you add an affiliation in the paper? That is required for papers to build (even if it just states "Independent researcher" or something similar).

Please also take a look at the DOI messages above.

Unfortunately, we do not have an editor in this area who is available to handle your submission at the moment, so I'll be placing this on our waitlist until someone becomes available.

kyleniemeyer commented 6 months ago

@bartandrews oh, I see that you do have an affiliation block in the paper. You just need to add affiliation: 1 to under your name, and then add index: 1 with the affiliation.

bartandrews commented 5 months ago

Hello @kyleniemeyer, thank you for your comments. I have made the corrections to the references and the affiliation. In terms of recommended referees, Jose Lado may be an appropriate choice (GitHub username: joselado), since he has developed similar software, has been a reviewer for JOSS before, and we do not know each other. Otherwise, out of the JOSS reviewer list, I have had a quick look and the following reviewers could be a good fit: Evan Sheridan, Santosh Kumar, or Mayeul d'Avezac, since they have a background in condensed matter theory.

bartandrews commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

QuantNBody: a Python package for quantum chemistry and physics to build and manipulate many-body operators and wave functions. Submitting author: @SYalouz Handling editor: @jarvist (Active) Reviewers: @wcwitt, @erikkjellgren Similarity score: 0.8179

IFermi: A python library for Fermi surface generation and analysis Submitting author: @utf Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active) Reviewers: @arosen93, @lucydot Similarity score: 0.8165

EMD: Empirical Mode Decomposition and Hilbert-Huang Spectral Analyses in Python Submitting author: @ajquinn Handling editor: @dpsanders (Retired) Reviewers: @JanCBrammer, @EtienneCmb, @neurofractal Similarity score: 0.8164

FHI-vibes: Ab Initio Vibrational Simulations Submitting author: @flokno Handling editor: @jgostick (Active) Reviewers: @keipertk, @ajjackson Similarity score: 0.8162

Spectrum: Spectral Analysis in Python Submitting author: @cokelaer Handling editor: @arfon (Active) Reviewers: @eteq Similarity score: 0.8146

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

kyleniemeyer commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot invite @RMeli as editor

Hi @RMeli, can you edit this submission?

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!