Closed editorialbot closed 5 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.13 s (563.5 files/s, 140382.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript 4 2099 1928 7019
HTML 37 1103 117 3609
TeX 2 69 9 521
R 12 148 434 519
YAML 7 27 10 165
Markdown 4 67 0 147
XML 1 0 0 129
Rmd 4 87 147 66
SVG 1 0 1 11
CSS 1 0 0 1
JSON 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 74 3600 2646 12188
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1368
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.21105/joss.04807 is OK
- 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101578 is OK
- 10.32932/pjnh.2020.07.070 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000082 is OK
- 10.1093/jamia/ocx079 is OK
- 10.1186/s12911-019-0793-0 is OK
- 10.1016/j.humimm.2013.06.025 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation
Submitting author: @assignUser
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @gagolews, @brunaw
Similarity score: 0.8566
graphsim: An R package for simulating gene expression data from graph structures of biological pathways
Submitting author: @TomKellyGenetics
Handling editor: @majensen (Active)
Reviewers: @rcannood, @corybrunson
Similarity score: 0.8157
kep_solver: A Python package for kidney exchange programme exploration
Submitting author: @WPettersson
Handling editor: @jmschrei (Active)
Reviewers: @arianesasso, @igarizio
Similarity score: 0.8084
MCSD: A MATLAB Tool for Monte-Carlo Simulations of Diffusion in biological Tissues
Submitting author: @davidnsousa
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @nnadeau, @mwacaan
Similarity score: 0.8000
secuTrialR: Seamless interaction with clinical trial databases in R
Submitting author: @PatrickRWright
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @pacoramon, @sachsmc
Similarity score: 0.7998
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@balima78 thanks for this submission to JOSS. I am the AEiC on this track and here to process initial steps. I am currently trying to determine if this work is in scope for JOSS. Could you please clarify what aspects, in terms of lines of code, from the above software report constitutes your original work/contribution? For this type of R-projects typically the core achievement is the R-code itself (here 519 lines), and the JavaScript/HTML code is automatically generated e.g. to enable a GUI/web tool environment. Can you confirm this please?
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Yes, I confirm that my core achievement is the R-code itself.
@balima78 the editorial board have unfortunately concluded that this work is not in scope for JOSS. In particular the small size cause it to not conform to our substantial scholarly effort criteria.
We will now proceed to reject this submission.
Note the above conclusion does not mean the work is not useful or not of a high quality, it merely means that given its rather small size it is not in scope for JOSS.
We do hope you will consider JOSS for any future (re)submissions of a more substantial magnitude.
@editorialbot reject
Paper rejected.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@balima78<!--end-author-handle-- (Bruno A Lima) Repository: https://github.com/txopen/simK Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.2.1 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @balima78. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@balima78 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: