openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
703 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Project RACCOON: Automated construction of PDB files for polymers and polymer peptide conjugates #6219

Closed editorialbot closed 7 months ago

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@moritzobenauer<!--end-author-handle-- (Moritz Obenauer) Repository: https://github.com/moritzobenauer/ProjectRaccoon Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@jromanowska<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @taoliu032, @lorenzo-rovigatti Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a72d0ea4ef2c43b6384a5fff784aa1ba"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a72d0ea4ef2c43b6384a5fff784aa1ba/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a72d0ea4ef2c43b6384a5fff784aa1ba/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/a72d0ea4ef2c43b6384a5fff784aa1ba)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @moritzobenauer. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@moritzobenauer if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 8 months ago
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (682.3 files/s, 95886.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                             1              0              0           1683
Python                          21            468            325           1465
YAML                             5             22             12            147
Markdown                         4             52              0            126
TeX                              1              9              0            116
Bourne Shell                     1             11              7             41
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0            267             27
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            34            562            611           3605
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 805

editorialbot commented 8 months ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41467-021-27627-4 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00054 is OK
- 10.1080/08927022.2010.507247 is OK
- 10.1002/marc.201800459 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092319-083243 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 may be a valid DOI for title: Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20945 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
editorialbot commented 8 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

E2EDNA 2.0: Python Pipeline for Simulating DNA Aptamers with Ligands Submitting author: @taoliu032 Handling editor: @csoneson (Active) Reviewers: @JoaoRodrigues, @rvhonorato Similarity score: 0.8082

oxDNA: coarse-grained simulations of nucleic acids made simple Submitting author: @lorenzo-rovigatti Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active) Reviewers: @ptmerz, @degiacom Similarity score: 0.8068

Cocktail Shaker: An open source drug expansion and enumeration library for peptides Submitting author: @Sulstice Handling editor: @csoneson (Active) Reviewers: @olivertomic, @richardjgowers Similarity score: 0.8052

polypy - Analysis Tools for Solid State Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Trajectories Submitting author: @symmy596 Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active) Reviewers: @hmacdope, @lscalfi Similarity score: 0.7999

ELECTRIC: Electric fields Leveraged from multipole Expansion Calculations in Tinker Rapid Interface Code Submitting author: @valeriewelborn Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active) Reviewers: @amandadumi, @govarguz Similarity score: 0.7976

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

moritzobenauer commented 7 months ago

Hello everybody,

in the following is a list of potential reviewers I find suitable for the project: Xujian Wang Benjamin Riesrichardjgowers Yuxuan Zhuang Matt Thompson

(Invalid DOIs pointed out by the editorialbot have been fixed 01/12/23)

If I can be of any further help, please let me know. Looking forward to the reviewing process. Best, Moritz

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 7 months ago

@moritzobenauer thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help with initial steps. I have just flagged this work for a scope review. This is because I need some help from the domain specialists in the editorial board to judge if this submission is in scope for JOSS. This scope review should take about two weeks.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 7 months ago

@moritzobenauer I am happy to inform you that the editorial board has determined that this submission may be in scope for JOSS. I have removed the query-scope label and will now be looking to assign a handling editor.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot invite @jromanowska as editor

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 7 months ago

:wave: @jromanowska would you be able to edit this one? Thanks!

jromanowska commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Assigned! @jromanowska is now the editor

jromanowska commented 7 months ago

Hi, @moritzobenauer , I will be serving as an editor on your submission. I'll try to find suitable reviewers asap. In the meantime, let me know if any changes occur.

jromanowska commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 7 months ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41467-021-27627-4 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00054 is OK
- 10.1080/08927022.2010.507247 is OK
- 10.1002/marc.201800459 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092319-083243 is OK
- 10.1002/jcc.20945 is OK
- 10.54677/MNMH8546 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 may be a valid DOI for title: Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform

INVALID DOIs

- None
jromanowska commented 7 months ago

@moritzobenauer - could you add a correct DOI to the reference, as shown above?

moritzobenauer commented 7 months ago

Hey, @jromanowska, the missing DOI was added. Sorry for the oversight!

jromanowska commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

E2EDNA 2.0: Python Pipeline for Simulating DNA Aptamers with Ligands Submitting author: @taoliu032 Handling editor: @csoneson (Active) Reviewers: @JoaoRodrigues, @rvhonorato Similarity score: 0.8130

oxDNA: coarse-grained simulations of nucleic acids made simple Submitting author: @lorenzo-rovigatti Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active) Reviewers: @ptmerz, @degiacom Similarity score: 0.8127

Cocktail Shaker: An open source drug expansion and enumeration library for peptides Submitting author: @Sulstice Handling editor: @csoneson (Active) Reviewers: @olivertomic, @richardjgowers Similarity score: 0.8119

polypy - Analysis Tools for Solid State Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Trajectories Submitting author: @symmy596 Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active) Reviewers: @hmacdope, @lscalfi Similarity score: 0.8079

ELECTRIC: Electric fields Leveraged from multipole Expansion Calculations in Tinker Rapid Interface Code Submitting author: @valeriewelborn Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active) Reviewers: @amandadumi, @govarguz Similarity score: 0.8050

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

jromanowska commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot add @taoliu032 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

@taoliu032 added to the reviewers list!

jromanowska commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot add @lorenzo-rovigatti as reviewer

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

@lorenzo-rovigatti added to the reviewers list!

jromanowska commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6293.