Closed editorialbot closed 7 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.05 s (682.3 files/s, 95886.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON 1 0 0 1683
Python 21 468 325 1465
YAML 5 22 12 147
Markdown 4 52 0 126
TeX 1 9 0 116
Bourne Shell 1 11 7 41
Jupyter Notebook 1 0 267 27
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 34 562 611 3605
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 805
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1038/s41467-021-27627-4 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00054 is OK
- 10.1080/08927022.2010.507247 is OK
- 10.1002/marc.201800459 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092319-083243 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 may be a valid DOI for title: Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20945 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
E2EDNA 2.0: Python Pipeline for Simulating DNA Aptamers with Ligands
Submitting author: @taoliu032
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @JoaoRodrigues, @rvhonorato
Similarity score: 0.8082
oxDNA: coarse-grained simulations of nucleic acids made simple
Submitting author: @lorenzo-rovigatti
Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active)
Reviewers: @ptmerz, @degiacom
Similarity score: 0.8068
Cocktail Shaker: An open source drug expansion and enumeration library for peptides
Submitting author: @Sulstice
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @olivertomic, @richardjgowers
Similarity score: 0.8052
polypy - Analysis Tools for Solid State Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Trajectories
Submitting author: @symmy596
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @hmacdope, @lscalfi
Similarity score: 0.7999
ELECTRIC: Electric fields Leveraged from multipole Expansion Calculations in Tinker Rapid Interface Code
Submitting author: @valeriewelborn
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @amandadumi, @govarguz
Similarity score: 0.7976
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
Hello everybody,
in the following is a list of potential reviewers I find suitable for the project: Xujian Wang Benjamin Riesrichardjgowers Yuxuan Zhuang Matt Thompson
(Invalid DOIs pointed out by the editorialbot have been fixed 01/12/23)
If I can be of any further help, please let me know. Looking forward to the reviewing process. Best, Moritz
@moritzobenauer thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help with initial steps. I have just flagged this work for a scope review. This is because I need some help from the domain specialists in the editorial board to judge if this submission is in scope for JOSS. This scope review should take about two weeks.
@moritzobenauer I am happy to inform you that the editorial board has determined that this submission may be in scope for JOSS. I have removed the query-scope label and will now be looking to assign a handling editor.
@editorialbot invite @jromanowska as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
:wave: @jromanowska would you be able to edit this one? Thanks!
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @jromanowska is now the editor
Hi, @moritzobenauer , I will be serving as an editor on your submission. I'll try to find suitable reviewers asap. In the meantime, let me know if any changes occur.
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1038/s41467-021-27627-4 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00054 is OK
- 10.1080/08927022.2010.507247 is OK
- 10.1002/marc.201800459 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-092319-083243 is OK
- 10.1002/jcc.20945 is OK
- 10.54677/MNMH8546 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 may be a valid DOI for title: Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform
INVALID DOIs
- None
@moritzobenauer - could you add a correct DOI to the reference, as shown above?
Hey, @jromanowska, the missing DOI was added. Sorry for the oversight!
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
E2EDNA 2.0: Python Pipeline for Simulating DNA Aptamers with Ligands
Submitting author: @taoliu032
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @JoaoRodrigues, @rvhonorato
Similarity score: 0.8130
oxDNA: coarse-grained simulations of nucleic acids made simple
Submitting author: @lorenzo-rovigatti
Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active)
Reviewers: @ptmerz, @degiacom
Similarity score: 0.8127
Cocktail Shaker: An open source drug expansion and enumeration library for peptides
Submitting author: @Sulstice
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @olivertomic, @richardjgowers
Similarity score: 0.8119
polypy - Analysis Tools for Solid State Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Trajectories
Submitting author: @symmy596
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @hmacdope, @lscalfi
Similarity score: 0.8079
ELECTRIC: Electric fields Leveraged from multipole Expansion Calculations in Tinker Rapid Interface Code
Submitting author: @valeriewelborn
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @amandadumi, @govarguz
Similarity score: 0.8050
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot add @taoliu032 as reviewer
@taoliu032 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @lorenzo-rovigatti as reviewer
@lorenzo-rovigatti added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6293.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@moritzobenauer<!--end-author-handle-- (Moritz Obenauer) Repository: https://github.com/moritzobenauer/ProjectRaccoon Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.1 Editor: !--editor-->@jromanowska<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @taoliu032, @lorenzo-rovigatti Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @moritzobenauer. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@moritzobenauer if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: