Closed editorialbot closed 8 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.07 s (767.5 files/s, 119307.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 24 1312 1941 3503
reStructuredText 18 259 409 177
TeX 1 8 0 105
YAML 4 15 12 90
Markdown 1 9 0 30
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
TOML 1 0 0 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 51 1615 2370 3943
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 506
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.3847/1538-4357/abb085 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.023522 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/045 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stab3201 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stae171 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@p-slash — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PACMAN: A pipeline to reduce and analyze Hubble Wide Field Camera 3 IR Grism data
Submitting author: @sebastian-zieba
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @astrobel, @aureliocarnero
Similarity score: 0.8247
PyCS3: A Python toolbox for time-delay measurements in lensed quasars
Submitting author: @martin-millon
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @danhey, @coljac
Similarity score: 0.8228
The Dusty Evolved Star Kit (DESK): A Python package for fitting the Spectral Energy Distribution of Evolved Stars
Submitting author: @s-goldman
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Deech08, @TomGoffrey
Similarity score: 0.8221
GoFish: Fishing for Line Observations in Protoplanetary Disks
Submitting author: @richteague
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @zhampel, @nespinoza
Similarity score: 0.8189
The Python Sky Model 3 software
Submitting author: @zonca
Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired)
Reviewers: @patricialarsen, @smsharma
Similarity score: 0.8155
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot commands
Hello @ivastar, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer
# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor
# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor
# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository
# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive
# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist
# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review
@editorialbot assign @ivastar as editor
Assigned! @ivastar is now the editor
Hi @p-slash! I will be your editor on this submission. I will be looking for reviewers over the next week or so. Please let me know if you have recommendations for reviewers (maybe some of the developers in DESI?) here or via e-mail. I would appreciate the assistance.
Hi @ivastar ,
Here are my recommendations:
César Ramírez-Pérez - cramirez@ifae.es Corentin Ravoux - corentin.ravoux@clermont.in2p3.fr
They have not used qsonic, but they are familiar with the algorithm and its application to Lyman-alpha forest analysis through another package called picca.
@ivastar any updates?
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
PACMAN: A pipeline to reduce and analyze Hubble Wide Field Camera 3 IR Grism data
Submitting author: @sebastian-zieba
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @astrobel, @aureliocarnero
Similarity score: 0.8208
PyCS3: A Python toolbox for time-delay measurements in lensed quasars
Submitting author: @martin-millon
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @danhey, @coljac
Similarity score: 0.8185
GoFish: Fishing for Line Observations in Protoplanetary Disks
Submitting author: @richteague
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @zhampel, @nespinoza
Similarity score: 0.8176
The Dusty Evolved Star Kit (DESK): A Python package for fitting the Spectral Energy Distribution of Evolved Stars
Submitting author: @s-goldman
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Deech08, @TomGoffrey
Similarity score: 0.8157
MCALF: Multi-Component Atmospheric Line Fitting
Submitting author: @ConorMacBride
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @mgalloy, @Goobley
Similarity score: 0.8119
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@p-slash still looking for reviewers.
@editorialbot commands
Hello @ivastar, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer
# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor
# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor
# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository
# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive
# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist
# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review
@editorialbot add @gcalderone as reviewer
@gcalderone added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @corentinravoux as reviewer
@corentinravoux added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6373.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@p-slash<!--end-author-handle-- (Naim Göksel Karaçaylı) Repository: https://github.com/p-slash/qsonic Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v0.8.2 Editor: !--editor-->@ivastar<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @gcalderone, @corentinravoux Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @p-slash. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@p-slash if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: