[PRE REVIEW]: JeFaPaTo - A joint toolbox for blinking analysis and facial features extraction

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Timozen<!--end-author-handle-- (Tim Büchner) Repository: https://github.com/cvjena/JeFaPaTo Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@samhforbes<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @mprib, @draabe Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8fd283f5c937564b15d7e228bfeb522e"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8fd283f5c937564b15d7e228bfeb522e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8fd283f5c937564b15d7e228bfeb522e/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/8fd283f5c937564b15d7e228bfeb522e)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Timozen. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Timozen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.20 s (337.5 files/s, 201242.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML                              1             11             32          33271
Python                          46           1340            937           4221
Markdown                         5            127              0            387
SVG                              5              5              5            321
Bourne Shell                     6             35             38            169
TeX                              1             10              0             96
YAML                             3             17             23             77
TOML                             1              3              0             10
DOS Batch                        1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            69           1548           1035          38558
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 3070

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.48550/arXiv.1906.08172 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1907.06724 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Mobile Gaze Mapping: A Python package for mapping mobile gaze data to a fixed target stimulus Submitting author: @jeffmacinnes Handling editor: @cMadan (Active) Reviewers: @nnadeau Similarity score: 0.8107

3D reconstruction toolbox for behavior tracked with multiple cameras Submitting author: @SwathiSheshadri Handling editor: @cMadan (Active) Reviewers: @danasolav, @sreschechtko Similarity score: 0.8096

openEyeTrack - A high speed multi-threaded eye tracker for head-fixed applications Submitting author: @chand-lab Handling editor: @cMadan (Active) Reviewers: @conradsnicta, @thejanzimmermann Similarity score: 0.8068

JASP for Audit: Bayesian Tools for the Auditing Practice Submitting author: @koenderks Handling editor: @drvinceknight (Active) Reviewers: @trstewart212, @fgeertman Similarity score: 0.8036

biopeaks: a graphical user interface for feature extraction from heart- and breathing biosignals Submitting author: @JanCBrammer Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active) Reviewers: @TomDonoghue, @sappelhoff, @jamesheathers Similarity score: 0.7990

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@samhforbes I think this looks like your cup of tea :tea: is that right? Would you be able to help edit it once you are available?

[samhforbes]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman definitely! There might be a short wait before I get started but I'm keen to look at this

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@samhforbes great. Do you mind if I assign you now, but that you start whenever you are ready?

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @samhforbes is now the editor

[samhforbes]

Hi @mprib, @felixhenninger, @draabe would you be interested in reviewing this software for us? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[samhforbes]

Hi @SwathiSheshadri, @jeffmacinnes would you be interested in reviewing this software for us? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[mprib]

Hello @samhforbes, please consider me available to serve as a reviewer for JeFaPaTo.

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot add @mprib as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@mprib added to the reviewers list!

[jeffmacinnes]

Hi @samhforbes - Thank you for consideration, but I respectfully will have to pass. I've stepped away from research and it's been ~5 years since I've done anything with automated computer vision analysis. This software looks really promising, and deserves a review from someone more up to date with the field than what I can offer.

[draabe]

👋 @samhforbes - thanks for the invitation, and apologies for the late reply. I'd be happy to do this review if I'm still being considered.

[samhforbes]

No worries @jeffmacinnes and thanks for responding.

Thanks @draabe I'll add you now!

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot add @draabe as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@draabe added to the reviewers list!

[samhforbes]

@Timozen we have a couple of reviewers, so I will close this and start the review process in another thread.

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6425.