search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: validateHOT #6268

Closed editorialbot closed 6 months ago

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@JoshSchramm94<!--end-author-handle-- (Joshua Benjamin Schramm) Repository: https://github.com/JoshSchramm94/validateHOT Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@skanwal<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @njtierney, @jamesuanhoro Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/85d008d0fef7c4079f41ff7d1102c805"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/85d008d0fef7c4079f41ff7d1102c805/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/85d008d0fef7c4079f41ff7d1102c805/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/85d008d0fef7c4079f41ff7d1102c805)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JoshSchramm94. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@JoshSchramm94 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 9 months ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (1009.2 files/s, 265296.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               52           1255           2646           6279
XML                              1              0             18           2377
Markdown                         3            271              0           1315
Rmd                              3            381            824            536
TeX                              1             34              0            289
YAML                             2             10              6             57
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            62           1951           3494          10853
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1754

editorialbot commented 9 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1177/002224299005400402 is OK
- 10.1177/0022243718817004 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-540-87753-0 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v105.i10 is OK
- 10.1509/jmkr.42.1.67.56890 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.08.007 is OK
- 10.1007/s11002-014-9326-x is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01686 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4842-9268-6 is OK
- 10.1086/208920 is OK
- 10.1287/mksc.15.2.173 is OK
- 10.1177/002224379503200402 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.08.007 is OK
- 10.1111/jpim.12077 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100394 is OK
- 10.1509/jmkr.48.1.140 is OK
- 10.1007/s11747-023-00997-5 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 9 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 9 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

robustHD: An R package for robust regression with high-dimensional data Submitting author: @aalfons Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired) Reviewers: @valentint, @msalibian Similarity score: 0.8097

hopit: An R Package for Analysis of Reporting Behavior Using Generalized Ordered Probit Models Submitting author: @MaciejDanko Handling editor: @alexhanna (Retired) Reviewers: @soodoku, @mkearney Similarity score: 0.8068

gofcat: An R package for goodness-of-fit of categorical response models Submitting author: @ejikeugba Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active) Reviewers: @NRaillard, @PhilipPallmann Similarity score: 0.8062

modeLLtest: An R Package for Unbiased Model Comparison using Cross Validation Submitting author: @ShanaScogin Handling editor: @usethedata (Retired) Reviewers: @andrewheiss, @usethedata Similarity score: 0.8030

mcboost: Multi-Calibration Boosting for R Submitting author: @pfistfl Handling editor: @osorensen (Active) Reviewers: @mwt, @OwenWard Similarity score: 0.7985

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

arfon commented 9 months ago

@JoshSchramm94 - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

JoshSchramm94 commented 9 months ago

@arfon - alright, no problem. Thanks a lot for getting back to me.

arfon commented 8 months ago

@JoshSchramm94 – one minor issue while we wait here, this paper is rather longer than we usually accept in JOSS. Ideally, we're looking for papers ~1000 words in length. I'm not sure if there are obvious ways in which you might be able to shorten this (e.g., move some of the examples into docs) but I just wanted to mention this before we get too far into the review process.

arfon commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot invite @skanwal as editor

:wave: @skanwal – would you be able to take on this submission for us?

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

JoshSchramm94 commented 8 months ago

@arfon - thanks for getting back to me. I have updated the paper accordingly and the word count is now below 1000.

JoshSchramm94 commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot invite @RMeli as editor

@RMeli – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

skanwal commented 7 months ago

@editorialbot assign @skanwal as editor

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Assigned! @skanwal is now the editor

skanwal commented 7 months ago

@JoshSchramm94 - would you like to suggest reviewers for your submission? Please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

skanwal commented 7 months ago

@@katekanecm - will you be happy to review this submission? PDF can be found in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6268#issuecomment-1976803599.

JoshSchramm94 commented 7 months ago

@skanwal, first of all thank you for reviewing the paper. I have looked through the list and suggest the following reviewers based on their expertise in bayesian methods and choice modelling. Hope that this procedure was ok.

  1. njtierney
  2. mariobecerra

  3. jamesuanhoro

    Thanks a lot again.

skanwal commented 7 months ago

@njtierney - will you be happy to review this submission? PDF can be found in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6268#issuecomment-1976803599.

skanwal commented 7 months ago

@mariobecerra - will you be happy to review this submission? PDF can be found in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6268#issuecomment-1976803599.

skanwal commented 7 months ago

@jamesuanhoro - will you be happy to review this submission? PDF can be found in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6268#issuecomment-1976803599.

skanwal commented 7 months ago

Hi @njtierney, @@mariobecerra, @jamesuanhoro - could you let us know if you have bandwidth to review this article?

jamesuanhoro commented 7 months ago

Hi @njtierney, @@mariobecerra, @jamesuanhoro - could you let us know if you have bandwidth to review this article?

I won't be able to review until May. Happy to begin my review then if the reviewer list is not complete by then.

njtierney commented 7 months ago

Hi @skanwal I can start the review on April 15, if that suits?

skanwal commented 7 months ago

Thanks @njtierney - Mid April sounds good to me.

skanwal commented 7 months ago

@jamesuanhoro - thank you. I'll ping you again if we haven't found a reviewer by May.

skanwal commented 6 months ago

Hi @jamesuanhoro - It'd be appreciated if you can review this submission in May as we haven't had a response from other reviewers yet?

I'll open up a review issue if you're happy with that?

jamesuanhoro commented 6 months ago

Hi @jamesuanhoro - It'd be appreciated if you can review this submission in May as we haven't had a response from other reviewers yet?

I'll open up a review issue if you're happy with that?

That works for me.

njtierney commented 6 months ago

I can review, but due to other commitments I can now only start the review in May.

skanwal commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot add @njtierney as reviewer.

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

@njtierney added to the reviewers list!

skanwal commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot add @jamesuanhoro as reviewer.

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

@jamesuanhoro added to the reviewers list!

skanwal commented 6 months ago

Thanks @jamesuanhoro @njtierney for agreeing to review this submission. I am starting a review issue next.

skanwal commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot start review.

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6708.