search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
721 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: DUGseis: A Python Package for Real-Time and Post-Processing of Picoseismicity #6349

Closed editorialbot closed 5 months ago

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@mrosskopf<!--end-author-handle-- (Martina Rosskopf) Repository: https://github.com/swiss-seismological-service/DUGseis Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.3 Editor: !--editor-->@crvernon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@ThomasLecocq<!--end-reviewers-list-- Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6852782d77b87a4f45a0c2058d056c6"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6852782d77b87a4f45a0c2058d056c6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6852782d77b87a4f45a0c2058d056c6/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6852782d77b87a4f45a0c2058d056c6)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mrosskopf. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mrosskopf if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 8 months ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.17 s (704.4 files/s, 138703.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          71           2479           3313          10703
SQL                              1            189              0           2016
Qt                               3              0              0           1558
XML                             15              0              0           1159
Markdown                        13            289              0            987
YAML                            13             80            180            675
TeX                              1             10              0             96
TOML                             1              6              1             70
C                                1             40             54             61
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
SVG                              1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           122           3105           3556          17361
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1331

editorialbot commented 8 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5880/GFZ.2.4.2020.003 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10054611 is OK
- 10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530 is OK
- 10.3390/s23063315 is OK
- 10.5194/se-13-301-2022 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.5194/se-11-627-2020 may be a valid DOI for title: Influence of reservoir geology on seismic response during decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2015.06.004 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- 10.5281/zenodo.10598393 is INVALID
- 10.3929/ethz-b-000651477 is INVALID
editorialbot commented 8 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

SeismicMesh: Triangular meshing for seismology Submitting author: @krober10nd Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired) Reviewers: @nschloe, @jorgensd Similarity score: 0.8239

UWGeodynamics: A teaching and research tool for numerical geodynamic modelling Submitting author: @rbeucher Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired) Reviewers: @flohorovicic Similarity score: 0.8203

Telewavesim: Python software for teleseismic body wave modeling Submitting author: @paudetseis Handling editor: @kbarnhart (Retired) Reviewers: @andreww, @seisman, @brmather Similarity score: 0.8202

pySYD: Automated measurements of global asteroseismic parameters Submitting author: @ashleychontos Handling editor: @mbobra (Active) Reviewers: @danhey, @benjaminpope Similarity score: 0.8189

DearEIS - A GUI program for analyzing impedance spectra Submitting author: @vyrjana Handling editor: @jgostick (Active) Reviewers: @Aslan-Kosakian, @mdmurbach Similarity score: 0.8187

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

kthyng commented 8 months ago

Hi @mrosskopf and thanks for your submission! We have a backlog of submissions so I will add this to our waitlist. In the meantime, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them. Also please address the DOI notes above. Thanks for your patience.

mrosskopf commented 8 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 8 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

mrosskopf commented 8 months ago

Hi @kthyng thank you for adding me to the waitlist. I addressed the DOI notes and hope all works now. My suggestions for reviewers are: ThomasLecocq, leonard-seydoux, fwalter, calum-chamberlain, seisman

Thank you again!

kthyng commented 7 months ago

Hi @mrosskopf! Another note — it would be great to add a readme to your repo to have something of a landing page for any potential users. I see you have info in your docs but it feels a bit empty without some info in the readme itself too.

kthyng commented 7 months ago

Also still looking for an editor for you.

mrosskopf commented 7 months ago

Hi @kthyng, thank you for the note. I updated the readme in the repo.

kthyng commented 6 months ago

@crvernon Are you up for editing another submission?

kthyng commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot invite @crvernon as editor

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

crvernon commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Assigned! @crvernon is now the editor

crvernon commented 6 months ago

:wave: @mrosskopf - I'll be your editor on this one. Once I get at least two reviews signed up I'll move this to full review status. Thanks!

crvernon commented 6 months ago

👋 @ThomasLecocq - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

crvernon commented 6 months ago

👋 @leonard-seydoux - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

crvernon commented 6 months ago

👋 @calum-chamberlain - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

ThomasLecocq commented 6 months ago

👋 @ThomasLecocq - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Yes

crvernon commented 6 months ago

Thanks @ThomasLecocq !

crvernon commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot add @ThomasLecocq as reviewer

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

@ThomasLecocq added to the reviewers list!

calum-chamberlain commented 6 months ago

👋 @calum-chamberlain - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Sorry, but I am flat out with teaching at the moment and won't be able to provide a timely review.

crvernon commented 6 months ago

👋 @fwalter - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

crvernon commented 6 months ago

:wave: @rowanc1 - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

crvernon commented 6 months ago

👋 @kwinkunks - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

crvernon commented 6 months ago

👋 @nialov - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

fwalter commented 6 months ago

Hello Chris,

I cannot see the paper I am supposed to review.

Fabian.

Von: Chris Vernon @.> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. April 2024 14:16 An: openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc: Fabian Walter @.>; Mention @.> Betreff: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: DUGseis: A Python Package for Real-Time and Post-Processing of Picoseismicity (Issue #6349)

👋 @nialovhttps://github.com/nialov - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6349#issuecomment-2079272977, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADC2IN37HJJ2KCBBHHLKRJTY7JASXAVCNFSM6AAAAABDGXKMHCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANZZGI3TEOJXG4. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

crvernon commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

Hello @fwalter the command above will compile the paper in a following comment. We are in pre-review status now, which is where we ensure we have at least two reviewers to kick off the full review which is where the checklist is present and the full review takes place.

Are you able to review this submission? If so, I'll assign you and we can kick this off to full review.

Thanks!

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

crvernon commented 6 months ago

👋 @SaumikDana - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

fwalter commented 6 months ago

I will have to decline, sorry for the late response. Several of the authors are part of an ongoing research collaboration and one may appear on a paper with me soon. I am not comfortable with this review.

Fabian.

Von: Chris Vernon @.> Datum: Freitag, 3. Mai 2024 um 13:53 An: openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc: Fabian Walter @.>, Mention @.> Betreff: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: DUGseis: A Python Package for Real-Time and Post-Processing of Picoseismicity (Issue #6349)

👋 @SaumikDanahttps://github.com/SaumikDana - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6349#issuecomment-2092849700, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADC2IN4ECFKCIZPCA4ZC5P3ZAN3C3AVCNFSM6AAAAABDGXKMHCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOJSHA2DSNZQGA. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

nialov commented 6 months ago

Sorry, I am too busy with prior reviews for a month or two. I can not take this one on my plate :(. So it is a no from me for the review.

crvernon commented 6 months ago

No problem @nialov thanks for the notice!

crvernon commented 5 months ago

👋 @AnantHariharan1996 - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

crvernon commented 5 months ago

😅 @mrosskopf - I am working on getting you another reviewer, once I do we can get this kicked over to full review!

Hang in there @ThomasLecocq, we will get you something to review ASAP!

crvernon commented 5 months ago

👋 @megies - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

crvernon commented 5 months ago

👋 @trichter - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

AnantHariharan1996 commented 5 months ago

@crvernon Apologies for the delay in response. Thanks for the review offer, but I have a few other items to review currently and so I will have to decline this for now. Best wishes.

megies commented 5 months ago

@crvernon I'm sorry, I won't be able to review

crvernon commented 5 months ago

:wave: @mrosskopf - having a crazy tough time finding you reviewers on this one. Any help would be appreciated.

In this case, I am going to go ahead and start the review with @ThomasLecocq confirmed so things can get moving. I'll find you another reviewer in parallel.

Thank you!

crvernon commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6768.