search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
696 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: MOTrainer: Distributed Measurement Operator Trainer for Data Assimilation Applications #6351

Closed editorialbot closed 3 months ago

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@rogerkuou<!--end-author-handle-- (Ou Ku) Repository: https://github.com/VegeWaterDynamics/motrainer Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.1.3 Editor: !--editor-->@srmnitc<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @abhishektiwari, @KwickSilver Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0ec1cefe66e3d09476dad0fe3b918c35"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0ec1cefe66e3d09476dad0fe3b918c35/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0ec1cefe66e3d09476dad0fe3b918c35/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0ec1cefe66e3d09476dad0fe3b918c35)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @rogerkuou. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@rogerkuou if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 5 months ago 
Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (802.0 files/s, 129411.1 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                      files          blank        comment           code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           12            241            331            904
Markdown                         12            179              0            445
Jupyter Notebook                  6              0           4309            298
YAML                              6             17              7            156
TOML                              1             16              6            128
TeX                               1              7              0             76
Bourne Shell                      1             10              5             48
JSON                              4              0              0             47
Bourne Again Shell                1              5              4             11
HTML                              1              2              0              9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             45            477           4662           2122
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
editorialbot commented 5 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2325780 is OK
- 10.1080/02723646.2016.1236606 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.148 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.25080/majora-7b98e3ed-013 may be a valid DOI for title: Dask: Parallel Computation with Blocked algorithms and Task Scheduling

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113116 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.09.009 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 555

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

ADaPT-ML: A Data Programming Template for Machine Learning Submitting author: @nulberry Handling editor: @jmschrei (Active) Reviewers: @aaronpeikert, @wincowgerDEV Similarity score: 0.8103

uDALES: large-eddy-simulation software for urban flow, dispersion, and microclimate modelling Submitting author: @tomgrylls Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @wimvanderbauwhede, @p-costa, @ashwinvis Similarity score: 0.8094

DASF: A data analytics software framework for distributed environments Submitting author: @d-eggert Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active) Reviewers: @cjwu, @pritchardn Similarity score: 0.8090

MCSD: A MATLAB Tool for Monte-Carlo Simulations of Diffusion in biological Tissues Submitting author: @davidnsousa Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active) Reviewers: @nnadeau, @mwacaan Similarity score: 0.8088

OpenOA: An Open-Source Codebase For Operational Analysis of Wind Farms Submitting author: @jordanperr Handling editor: @sjpfenninger (Retired) Reviewers: @gschivley, @brynpickering Similarity score: 0.8082

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

arfon commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot query scope

@rogerkuou – due to the relatively small size of this code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. We should get back to you sometime next week. If you want to fix the DOIs (noting that @editorialbot's suggestions are not always right), you can, then use the following commands (one at a time, as the first line of a new comment) to regenerate the PDF and check the references.

@editorialbot generate pdf @editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Submission flagged for editorial review.

arfon commented 4 months ago

@rogerkuou - thanks for your submission to JOSS. This submission has passed an initial scope review. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

arfon commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot invite @srmnitc as editor

:wave: @srmnitc – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS? It feels somewhat close(ish!) to 'research data management'.

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

srmnitc commented 3 months ago

@arfon It is slightly of my expertise, but I think I can manage to edit this.

srmnitc commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Assigned! @srmnitc is now the editor

srmnitc commented 3 months ago

@rogerkuou I will be the handling editor for this submission. The next step would be to find some reviewers for the submission. Unfortunately, I am on holidays from tomorrow, but I will be back next week.

Meanwhile, feel free to ask me any questions here. Any suggestions that you might have for reviewers is also welcome!

rogerkuou commented 3 months ago

Hi @srmnitc, Thanks a lot! And also thanks @arfon for the scope-review!

For now, I do not have any questions. If there turns out to be anything unclear for the tests or documentation, just let me know.

And @srmnitc hope you enjoy the holiday! Have a good one.

srmnitc commented 3 months ago

:wave: @nulberry @d-eggert @KwickSilver @abhishektiwari , would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? As you know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines. Thanks!

abhishektiwari commented 3 months ago

@srmnitc sure. Looks interesting paper. Add me as reviewer.

srmnitc commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot add @abhishektiwari as reviewer

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

@abhishektiwari added to the reviewers list!

KwickSilver commented 3 months ago

Hi Sarath,

The paper seems interesting, and I'm eager to contribute to the review process. Could you please include me as a reviewer as well?

Thank you, Shantanu

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 04:01, The Open Journals editorial robot < @.***> wrote:

@abhishektiwari https://github.com/abhishektiwari added to the reviewers list!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6351#issuecomment-2039511815, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCUHHMV5K2YS7GLGKMVQWLY32AB7AVCNFSM6AAAAABDGXL2X2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMZZGUYTCOBRGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

srmnitc commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot add @KwickSilver as reviewer

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

@KwickSilver added to the reviewers list!

srmnitc commented 3 months ago

@rogerkuou We have two reviewers already, but I will give a bit more time for the others to respond, and then we will get started with the reviews.

d-eggert commented 3 months ago

@srmnitc The publication looks interesting, but I have no time available at the moment, sorry.

rogerkuou commented 3 months ago

@srmnitc Thanks a lot! No problem, just take the time you need. @KwickSilver and @abhishektiwari Thanks for taking time to review this paper!

srmnitc commented 3 months ago

@KwickSilver and @abhishektiwari thanks for agreeing to be reviewers. I will now start the review thread.

srmnitc commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6591.