Closed editorialbot closed 6 months ago
@editorialbot set joss as version
Done! version is now joss
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.11002422 as archive
Done! archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.11002422
:wave: @KennethEnevoldsen - one last thing before we accept...
Could you edit your metadata for the license stated in this archive https://zenodo.org/records/11002422 to match what is used by your package?
No need to do another release, you can just edit the existing record on Zenodo.
Let me know when this is done and I'll move forward with accepting the submission for publications. Thanks!
@crvernon I have updated the license to match
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.
If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.
You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:
``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Enevoldsen given-names: Kenneth orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-0966" doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11002422 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Enevoldsen given-names: Kenneth orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-0966" date-published: 2024-04-27 doi: 10.21105/joss.06370 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 96 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 6370 title: "Augmenty: A Python Library for Structured Text Augmentation" type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06370" volume: 9 title: "Augmenty: A Python Library for Structured Text Augmentation" ```
If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.
🐘🐘🐘 👉 Toot for this paper 👈 🐘🐘🐘
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
Congratulations on your new publication @KennethEnevoldsen! Many thanks to @arfon and to reviewers @sap218 and @wdduncan for your time, hard work, and expertise!! JOSS wouldn't be able to function nor succeed without your efforts.
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06370/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06370)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06370">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06370/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06370/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06370
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
Thanks @crvernon, @arfon and the reviewers @wdduncan and @sap218 - very happy about the feedback always a good experience to publish with joss
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@KennethEnevoldsen<!--end-author-handle-- (Kenneth C. Enevoldsen) Repository: https://github.com/KennethEnevoldsen/augmenty Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: joss Editor: !--editor-->@arfon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @sap218, @wdduncan Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.11002422
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@sap218 & @wdduncan, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arfon know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @sap218
📝 Checklist for @wdduncan