[PRE REVIEW]: Sports2D: Compute 2D joint and segment angles from your smartphone

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@DavidPagnon@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @tuliofalmeida, @nicos1993, @johnjdavisiv Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1d525bbb2695c88c6ebbf2297bd35897"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1d525bbb2695c88c6ebbf2297bd35897/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1d525bbb2695c88c6ebbf2297bd35897/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1d525bbb2695c88c6ebbf2297bd35897)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @DavidPagnon. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@DavidPagnon if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.05 s (409.0 files/s, 172583.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML                              1              0            931           1911
Python                          11            414            681           1329
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0           2811            296
Markdown                         2            112              0            245
TeX                              1             24              0            239
YAML                             3             17             14             96
TOML                             3             37             33             94
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            22            604           4470           4210
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Wordcount for paper.md is 1280

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.48550/arXiv.2006.10204 is OK
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2929257 is OK
- 10.2307/2683591 is OK
- 10.1186/s40798-018-0139-y is OK
- 10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y is OK
- 10.1080/24748668.2008.11868456 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04362 is OK
- 10.1101/2022.07.07.499061 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1101/2022.09.29.22280368 may be a valid DOI for title: Smartphone videos of the sit-to-stand test predict osteoarthritis and health outcomes in a nationwide study
- 10.1007/s00167-021-06709-2 may be a valid DOI for title: A 2D qualitative movement assessment of a deceleration task detects football players with high knee joint loading
- 10.1038/s41467-020-17807-z may be a valid DOI for title: Deep neural networks enable quantitative movement analysis using single-camera videos
- 10.2139/ssrn.3413035 may be a valid DOI for title: Clinical trial data transparency and GDPR compliance: Implications for data sharing and open innovation
- 10.1080/00140139.2015.1057238 may be a valid DOI for title: Comparison between low-cost marker-less and high-end marker-based motion capture systems for the computer-aided assessment of working ergonomics
- 10.2307/41410412 may be a valid DOI for title: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00772.2007 may be a valid DOI for title: Hypergravity resistance exercise: the use of artificial gravity as potential countermeasure to microgravity

INVALID DOIs

- None

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Pose2Sim: An open-source Python package for multiview markerless kinematics Submitting author: @DavidPagnon Handling editor: @danasolav (Active) Reviewers: @lambdaloop, @jonmatthis, @CVHammond Similarity score: 0.8215

3D reconstruction toolbox for behavior tracked with multiple cameras Submitting author: @SwathiSheshadri Handling editor: @cMadan (Active) Reviewers: @danasolav, @sreschechtko Similarity score: 0.7984

Sit2StandPy: An Open-Source Python Package for Detecting and Quantifying Sit-to-Stand Transitions Using an Accelerometer on the Lower Back Submitting author: @LukasAdamowicz Handling editor: @galessiorob (Active) Reviewers: @jsgalan, @gweissman Similarity score: 0.7977

Kinematics-vis: A Visualization Tool for the Mathematics of Human Motion Submitting author: @heath-henninger Handling editor: @adi3 (Active) Reviewers: @destogl, @nnadeau Similarity score: 0.7919

pytransform3d: 3D Transformations for Python Submitting author: @AlexanderFabisch Handling editor: @brainstorm (Retired) Reviewers: @luizirber Similarity score: 0.7861

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

davidpagnon commented 6 months ago

From the above similar articles, it seems like LukasAdamowicz (Sit2StandPy) and SwathiSheshadri (pose-3d) could be a good fit for reviewing sports2d! Maybe tuliofalmeida, melund, and/or alcantarar as well.

@editorialbot generate pdf

davidpagnon commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Pose2Sim: An open-source Python package for multiview markerless kinematics Submitting author: @DavidPagnon Handling editor: @danasolav (Active) Reviewers: @lambdaloop, @jonmatthis, @CVHammond Similarity score: 0.8216

3D reconstruction toolbox for behavior tracked with multiple cameras Submitting author: @SwathiSheshadri Handling editor: @cMadan (Active) Reviewers: @danasolav, @sreschechtko Similarity score: 0.7985

Sit2StandPy: An Open-Source Python Package for Detecting and Quantifying Sit-to-Stand Transitions Using an Accelerometer on the Lower Back Submitting author: @LukasAdamowicz Handling editor: @galessiorob (Active) Reviewers: @jsgalan, @gweissman Similarity score: 0.7978

Kinematics-vis: A Visualization Tool for the Mathematics of Human Motion Submitting author: @heath-henninger Handling editor: @adi3 (Active) Reviewers: @destogl, @nnadeau Similarity score: 0.7920

pytransform3d: 3D Transformations for Python Submitting author: @AlexanderFabisch Handling editor: @brainstorm (Retired) Reviewers: @luizirber Similarity score: 0.7862

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Assigned! @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman is now the editor

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 5 months ago

@davidpagnon thanks for this submission. I am currently looking into potential reviewers. Let me know if you have any suggestions for reviewers at this point. You can mention their GitHub handles here, but leave out the @ symbol.

davidpagnon commented 5 months ago

Hi Kevin, thank you for offering yourself as an editor!

I suggested a few in a previous comment, but of course, I'm open to anyone else.

From the above similar articles, it seems like LukasAdamowicz (Sit2StandPy) and SwathiSheshadri (pose-3d) could be a good fit for reviewing sports2d! Maybe tuliofalmeida, melund, and/or alcantarar as well.

P.S.: I just edited a github action, build was unsuccessful on certain distribution due to an incompatible package version. All builds are now successful.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 5 months ago

@davidpagnon

[x] Please study the above reference check :point_up: and see if you can address any of the reported potential DOI issues. You can add/amend DOI entries in your .bib file, and call @editorialbot check references here to check them again.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 5 months ago

@SwathiSheshadri, @lambdaloop, @CVHammond, @destogl, @moorepants, @modenaxe would you be interested in helping to review this submission for JOSS? The work features 2D join angle analysis from sport video footage.

Software: https://github.com/davidpagnon/Sports2D Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06375/joss.06375/10.21105.joss.06375.pdf

davidpagnon commented 5 months ago

@davidpagnon

[ ] Please study the above reference check ☝️ and see if you can address any of the reported potential DOI issues. You can add/amend DOI entries in your .bib file, and call @editorialbot check references here to check them again.

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.48550/arXiv.2006.10204 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4842-4470-8 is OK
- 10.1038/s41746-023-00775-1 is OK
- 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450 is OK
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2929257 is OK
- 10.2307/2683591 is OK
- 10.1186/s40798-018-0139-y is OK
- 10.1007/s00167-021-06709-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-020-17807-z is OK
- 10.1038/s41593-018-0209-y is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.3413035 is OK
- 10.1080/24748668.2008.11868456 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04362 is OK
- 10.1080/00140139.2015.1057238 is OK
- 10.1101/2022.07.07.499061 is OK
- 10.2307/41410412 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj.12995 is OK
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00772.2007 is OK
- 10.1145/3603618 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: The OpenCV Library
- No DOI given, and none found for title: On the theory of filter amplifiers
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Kinovea - A microscope for your videos
- No DOI given, and none found for title: A 3D markerless protocol with action cameras – Key...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Gait analysis: an introduction

INVALID DOIs

- None

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 months ago

@SwathiSheshadri, @lambdaloop, @CVHammond, @destogl, @moorepants, @modenaxe would you be interested in helping to review this submission for JOSS? The work features 2D join angle analysis from sport video footage.

Software: https://github.com/davidpagnon/Sports2D Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06375/joss.06375/10.21105.joss.06375.pdf

davidpagnon commented 4 months ago

Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, I don't see any response and I'm not sure these guys saw the notification. What is the process usually in this case? Trying to contact them per email, or contact other authors?

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 months ago

Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, I don't see any response and I'm not sure these guys saw the notification. What is the process usually in this case? Trying to contact them per email, or contact other authors?

@davidpagnon apologies for the delay. I will get back to this shortly and yes I'll try to 1) remind them here once more, and 2) email a few.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 4 months ago

@SwathiSheshadri, @lambdaloop, @CVHammond, @destogl, @moorepants, @modenaxe would you be interested in helping to review this submission for JOSS? The work features 2D join angle analysis from sport video footage.

Software: https://github.com/davidpagnon/Sports2D Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06375/joss.06375/10.21105.joss.06375.pdf

lambdaloop commented 4 months ago

Hello, thank you for pinging me again. I'm sorry I did miss the previous notification. It looks interesting, but I don't have time to review this submission.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

@SwathiSheshadri, @CVHammond, @destogl, @moorepants, @modenaxe, @LukasAdamowicz @tuliofalmeida @melund @alcantarar

would you be interested in helping to review this submission for JOSS? The work features 2D join angle analysis from sport video footage.

Software: https://github.com/davidpagnon/Sports2D Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06375/joss.06375/10.21105.joss.06375.pdf

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

@davidpagnon apologies for the delays encountered so far. I've just invited some more reviewers. I'll search some more this week if we do not hear back from any of these. Let me know in the mean time if you think there are any others you think I should reach out to.

davidpagnon commented 3 months ago

@kidzik maybe, who coded the Mobile Gait Lab? And maybe @JuliusWelzel and colleagues as well? (@masoudabedinifar, @rmndrs89)

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

Thanks for the suggestions. If you have more suggestions please leave out the @ symbol so they are not tagged.

rmndrs89 commented 3 months ago

Hi David and Kevin,

I am interested in reviewing this :)

BR

tuliofalmeida commented 3 months ago

Hello Kevin, I'm available to review the paper after 11/06 if it's not a problem for you!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot add @tuliofalmeida as reviewer

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

@tuliofalmeida added to the reviewers list!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

@davidpagnon thanks for suggesting the authors of this submission: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6627 as reviewers. Although under different circumstances they could be suitable reviewers, because you are a reviewer for their submission, they cannot currently review yours as that would constitute a potential conflict of interest.

Hence @rmndrs89 and colleagues, unfortunately you cannot be a reviewer for this work. Thanks for offering to review though.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

@SwathiSheshadri, @CVHammond, @destogl, @moorepants, @modenaxe, @LukasAdamowicz @tuliofalmeida @melund @alcantarar @claaslendt

would you be interested in helping to review this submission for JOSS? The work features 2D join angle analysis from sport video footage.

Software: https://github.com/davidpagnon/Sports2D Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06375/joss.06375/10.21105.joss.06375.pdf

melund commented 3 months ago

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman. Sorry, I will not have time to do this at the moment.

LukasAdamowicz commented 3 months ago

Unfortunately I am too busy as well

claaslendt commented 3 months ago

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman. Thanks for considering me. I am afraid that this is a bit outside my area of expertise.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

@SwathiSheshadri, @CVHammond, @destogl, @moorepants, @modenaxe, ,@tuliofalmeida, @alcantarar

would you be interested in helping to review this submission for JOSS? The work features 2D join angle analysis from sport video footage.

Software: https://github.com/davidpagnon/Sports2D Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06375/joss.06375/10.21105.joss.06375.pdf

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

@melund @LukasAdamowicz @claaslendt no worries, thanks for getting back to me.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

@SwathiSheshadri, @CVHammond, @destogl, @moorepants, @modenaxe, ,@tuliofalmeida, @alcantarar, @BKillen05, @nicos1993, @johnjdavisiv, @adrianrivadulla, @Ipuch, @evaherbst, @dc547

would you be interested in helping to review this submission for JOSS? The work features 2D join angle analysis from sport video footage.

Software: https://github.com/davidpagnon/Sports2D Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06375/joss.06375/10.21105.joss.06375.pdf

evaherbst commented 3 months ago

Thanks @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman for the invitation to review. I am stretched super thin for the next months with different projects so I cannot at this time, but please do contact me for future reviews.