Open editorialbot opened 6 months ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.27 s (716.4 files/s, 135373.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 91 4331 7423 13226
reStructuredText 79 3582 3993 1319
TeX 1 42 0 469
Markdown 2 82 0 199
CSS 1 69 163 174
YAML 4 17 26 78
TOML 1 4 0 70
Jupyter Notebook 16 0 1841 64
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 197 8139 13454 15634
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 1704
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.48550/arXiv.2203.15588 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_24 is OK
- 10.1186/s12911-020-01340-6 is OK
- 10.3390/diagnostics12123192 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac641 is OK
- 10.1093/jamia/ocac168 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106113 is OK
- 10.1109/ISBI45749.2020.9098645 is OK
- 10.1007/s00432-022-04180-1 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03823 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.05027 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.05093 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.09.012 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107413 is OK
- 10.1007/s13755-023-00231-0 is OK
- 10.32604/iasc.2023.029756 is OK
- 10.1007/s42979-021-00971-4 is OK
- 10.1002/aisy.202200213 is OK
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.06.019 is OK
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.025 is OK
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3140815 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.090 is OK
- 10.1162/neco_a_01273 is OK
- 10.1093/bib/bbab569 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/978-3-031-43993-3_19 may be a valid DOI for title: Multimodal brain age estimation using interpretable adaptive population-graph learning
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Hi @aaronhan223, @felixkrones, thank you very much for agreeing to review the paper! You can proceed by typing @editorialbot generate my checklist
in this GitHub issue to see the checklist that will guide the review (the checklist won't work over email). Thank you again!
Hi @aaronhan223, @felixkrones, hope you're having a good day! Just a friendly reminder about the review for Fusilli: A Python package for multimodal data fusion. Your expertise is invaluable to this process, and we're looking forward to your next steps. Please update us on your progress when you can. Thanks so much!
Hi @aaronhan223, @felixkrones. I hope all is well. This is a gentle reminder about the paper A Python package for multimodal data fusion. Please let me know if you need any help or support. Thank you for your efforts!
:wave: @atrisovic - we may need to get new reviewers if @aaronhan223 and @felixkrones don't respond soon. Could you please try to email them as well? Thanks!
Hi @crvernon I haven't had much luck with the emails and the search for new reviewers. I wonder if @florencejt has suggestions for potential reviewers?
Hi @atrisovic! Thanks for your help on this, it's a shame about the other reviewers. I've got two suggestions for new potential reviewers: Sam Gijsen (sam.gijsen@charite.de) and Cameron Shand (cameron.shand@crick.ac.uk). Sam has used fusilli before so is acquainted with how it works, and Cameron is a research software engineer. Let me know if these suggestions are ok and if you'd like me to try to think of more.
Thank you very much @florencejt!! I will email them right away.
@editorialbot add @cairola as reviewer
@cairola added to the reviewers list!
Hi @cairola, thank you very much for agreeing to review the paper. To start your review, please type:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@florencejt<!--end-author-handle-- (Florence J Townend) Repository: https://github.com/florencejt/fusilli Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.2.2 Editor: !--editor-->@atrisovic<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @aaronhan223, @felixkrones, @cairola Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@aaronhan223 & @felixkrones, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @atrisovic know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @cairola