[REVIEW]: RAMP: stochastic simulation of user-driven energy demand time series

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@FLomb@AdamRJensen<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @FabianHofmann, @trevorb1 Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.11526597

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e87d43a5f8747d2b6e8d65f98446baf3"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e87d43a5f8747d2b6e8d65f98446baf3/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e87d43a5f8747d2b6e8d65f98446baf3/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e87d43a5f8747d2b6e8d65f98446baf3)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@noah80 & @FabianHofmann, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @AdamRJensen know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

📝 Checklist for @noah80

📝 Checklist for @FabianHofmann

📝 Checklist for @trevorb1

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

🐘🐘🐘 👉 Toot for this paper 👈 🐘🐘🐘

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨

Here's what you must now do:

Check final PDF and Crossref metadata that was deposited :point_right: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5495
Wait five minutes, then verify that the paper DOI resolves https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06418
If everything looks good, then close this review issue.
Party like you just published a paper! 🎉🌈🦄💃👻🤘

Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...

kyleniemeyer commented 3 months ago

Congratulations @FLomb on your article's publication in JOSS! Please consider signing up as a reviewer if you haven't already.

Many thanks to @FabianHofmann and @trevorb1 for reviewing this, and @AdamRJensen for editing.

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06418/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06418)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06418">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06418/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06418/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06418

This is how it will look in your documentation:

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

Volunteering to review for us sometime in the future. You can add your name to the reviewer list here: https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/join
Making a small donation to support our running costs here: https://numfocus.org/donate-to-joss

FLomb commented 3 months ago

Wonderful! Many thanks, @trevorb1, @FabianHofmann, @AdamRJensen and @kyleniemeyer, for contributing to this process in your different roles!

FabianHofmann commented 3 months ago

Congrats! Was a pleasure!

openjournals / joss-reviews