Closed editorialbot closed 4 months ago
@editorialbot recommend-accept
Attempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1029/2022MS003156 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-10-4619-2017 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.148 is OK
- 10.5194/egusphere-2023-2720 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.2209431119 is OK
- 10.1109/ICDMW.2009.64 is OK
- 10.1002/2014EO420002 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-15-9031-2022 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.2586088 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10038784 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8339034 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10236521 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8356796 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7348619 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Dask: Library for dynamic task scheduling
- No DOI given, and none found for title: E3SM-Unified: A metapackage for a unified anaconda...
INVALID DOIs
- None
:wave: @openjournals/ese-eics, this paper is ready to be accepted and published.
Check final proof :point_right::page_facing_up: Download article
If the paper PDF and the deposit XML files look good in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/pull/5552, then you can now move forward with accepting the submission by compiling again with the command @editorialbot accept
@editorialbot accept
Doing it live! Attempting automated processing of paper acceptance...
Ensure proper citation by uploading a plain text CITATION.cff file to the default branch of your repository.
If using GitHub, a Cite this repository menu will appear in the About section, containing both APA and BibTeX formats. When exported to Zotero using a browser plugin, Zotero will automatically create an entry using the information contained in the .cff file.
You can copy the contents for your CITATION.cff file here:
``` cff-version: "1.2.0" authors: - family-names: Vo given-names: Tom orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-0191" - family-names: Po-Chedley given-names: Stephen orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0390-238X" - family-names: Boutte given-names: Jason orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3996-3772" - family-names: Lee given-names: Jiwoo orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-7199" - family-names: Zhang given-names: Chengzhu orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9632-0716" doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12522560 message: If you use this software, please cite our article in the Journal of Open Source Software. preferred-citation: authors: - family-names: Vo given-names: Tom orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-0191" - family-names: Po-Chedley given-names: Stephen orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0390-238X" - family-names: Boutte given-names: Jason orcid: "https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3996-3772" - family-names: Lee given-names: Jiwoo orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-7199" - family-names: Zhang given-names: Chengzhu orcid: "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9632-0716" date-published: 2024-06-29 doi: 10.21105/joss.06426 issn: 2475-9066 issue: 98 journal: Journal of Open Source Software publisher: name: Open Journals start: 6426 title: "xCDAT: A Python Package for Simple and Robust Analysis of Climate Data" type: article url: "https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06426" volume: 9 title: "xCDAT: A Python Package for Simple and Robust Analysis of Climate Data" ```
If the repository is not hosted on GitHub, a .cff file can still be uploaded to set your preferred citation. Users will be able to manually copy and paste the citation.
🐘🐘🐘 👉 Toot for this paper 👈 🐘🐘🐘
🚨🚨🚨 THIS IS NOT A DRILL, YOU HAVE JUST ACCEPTED A PAPER INTO JOSS! 🚨🚨🚨
Here's what you must now do:
Any issues? Notify your editorial technical team...
@brian-rose, @mgrover1 – many thanks for your reviews here! JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you ✨
@tomvothecoder – your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS :zap::rocket::boom:
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06426/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06426)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06426">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06426/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06426/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06426
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
@brian-rose, @mgrover1 – many thanks for your reviews here! JOSS relies upon the volunteer effort of people like you and we simply wouldn't be able to do this without you ✨
@tomvothecoder – your paper is now accepted and published in JOSS ⚡🚀💥
Thanks @arfon for facilitating the review process for this paper! I am grateful and excited to have this xCDAT paper published in JOSS. This is a great milestone for the project.
And big thanks to @brian-rose and @mgrover1 for your diligent review. I appreciate your time and interest in xCDAT! Feel free to reach out if you ever need anything xCDAT related (or a review of a paper like this) :)
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@tomvothecoder<!--end-author-handle-- (Tom Vo) Repository: https://github.com/xCDAT/xcdat Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v0.7.1 Editor: !--editor-->@arfon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @brian-rose, @mgrover1 Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.12522560
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@brian-rose & @mgrover1, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arfon know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @mgrover1
📝 Checklist for @brian-rose