search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
720 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: cuallee: A python package for data quality checks across multiple DataFrame APIs #6459

Closed editorialbot closed 5 months ago

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@canimus<!--end-author-handle-- (Herminio Vazquez) Repository: https://github.com/canimus/cuallee Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v0.8.8 Editor: !--editor-->@jbytecode<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @devarops, @FlorianK13 Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/db01d4f5a02a319fe2b4c49f68e3f859"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/db01d4f5a02a319fe2b4c49f68e3f859/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/db01d4f5a02a319fe2b4c49f68e3f859/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/db01d4f5a02a319fe2b4c49f68e3f859)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @canimus. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@canimus if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 7 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1145/3603707 is OK
- 10.1145/3603706 is OK
- 10.1145/3580305.3599776 is OK
- 10.14778/3229863.3229867 is OK
- 10.1145/3529190.3529222 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Gaps in Globular Cluster Streams: Pal 5 and the Ga...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Fidgit: An ungodly union of GitHub and Figshare

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.15 s (1912.7 files/s, 151496.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         248           2669            796          11857
Markdown                        16           1523              0           4180
XML                              1              0              0            635
SVG                              5              5              2            213
TeX                              1             11              0            126
YAML                             3              6             14            122
TOML                             1              5              1             64
make                             1             11              0             42
Dockerfile                       2             11              2             33
INI                              1              0              0              5
Bourne Shell                     3              0              0              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           282           4241            815          17280
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   344  Herminio Vazquez
    66  Virginie Grosboillot
    24  dependabot[bot]
     2  Demetrius Albuquerque
     1  Corey Runkel
     1  Ryan Julyan
     1  dCodeYL
editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1241

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

License info:

✅ License found: Apache License 2.0 (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 7 months ago

@canimus - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

canimus commented 7 months ago

@arfon understood. Thanks for the prompt reply.

canimus commented 6 months ago

@arfon I found that Evaristo Rojas-Mayoral appears as a reviewer that could look into our paper.

arfon commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot invite @jbytecode as editor

:wave: @jbytecode – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

jbytecode commented 6 months ago

@arfon - sure, gladly!

jbytecode commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Assigned! @jbytecode is now the editor

jbytecode commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot check references

editorialbot commented 6 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1145/3603707 is OK
- 10.1145/3603706 is OK
- 10.1145/3580305.3599776 is OK
- 10.14778/3229863.3229867 is OK
- 10.1145/3529190.3529222 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
jbytecode commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

jbytecode commented 6 months ago

@canimus - if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Please do not use the @ character just because we don't want to bother them with notifications.

jbytecode commented 6 months ago

I'm pausing the issue until we receive any response from the author

canimus commented 6 months ago

Hi @jbytecode I mentioned devarops on March 27. Would that work?

jbytecode commented 6 months ago

👋👋👋 Dear @devarops, @htwangtw 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

cuallee: A python package for data quality checks across multiple DataFrame APIs

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6459).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

devarops commented 6 months ago

@jbytecode: Yes, I would be happy to review this submission.

jbytecode commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot add @devarops as reviewer

@devarops - Thank you for accepting our invitation. After we assign the second reviewer, the review will start in a separate thread. I will introduce the steps there.

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

@devarops added to the reviewers list!

htwangtw commented 6 months ago

@jbytecode: I don't feel I am the most suitable reviewer as I am only familiar with one data frame api amongst the covered options. I hope you can find someone else!

jbytecode commented 6 months ago

👋👋👋 Dear @FlorianK13, @SarthakJariwala 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

cuallee: A python package for data quality checks across multiple DataFrame APIs

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6459).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

FlorianK13 commented 6 months ago

Hi @jbytecode, I'd be happy to review the package!

jbytecode commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot add @FlorianK13 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

@FlorianK13 added to the reviewers list!

jbytecode commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6684.

SarthakJariwala commented 5 months ago

Hi @jbytecode, just coming around to my GitHub notifications after a break. I would be happy to review but it looks like you've already got required reviewers 👍🏽