Closed editorialbot closed 4 months ago
Congratulations on your new publication @feldl! Many thanks to @rwegener2 and to reviewers @usethedata and @simonom for your time, hard work, and expertise!! JOSS wouldn't be able to function nor succeed without your efforts.
:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:
If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06481/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06481)
HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06481">
<img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06481/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>
reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06481/status.svg
:target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06481
This is how it will look in your documentation:
We need your help!
The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
@feldl If you would like to join JOSS as a reviewer, please do so here: https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/
@kthyng, @usethedata, @simonom, @rwegener2, thank you so much for reviewing and editing our submission and for all your helpful feedback!
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@feldl<!--end-author-handle-- (Lena Feld) Repository: https://gitlab.eudat.eu/coccon-kit/proffastpylot Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v1.3.2 Editor: !--editor-->@rwegener2<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @usethedata, @simonom Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.11035671
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@usethedata & @simonom, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @rwegener2 know.
β¨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest β¨
Checklists
π Checklist for @usethedata
π Checklist for @simonom