search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
720 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: DRDMannTurb: A python package for scalable, data-driven synthetic turbulence #6506

Closed editorialbot closed 4 months ago

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@alizma<!--end-author-handle-- (Alexey Izmailov) Repository: https://github.com/METHODS-Group/DRDMannTurb Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@HaoZeke<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @paroomk, @olivecha Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4c1af9b22a5861f5be343ba20133d24c"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4c1af9b22a5861f5be343ba20133d24c/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4c1af9b22a5861f5be343ba20133d24c/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4c1af9b22a5861f5be343ba20133d24c)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @alizma. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@alizma if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.06 s (1342.3 files/s, 139110.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          41           1360           2102           3712
reStructuredText                23            298            394            158
CSV                              4              0              0            128
YAML                             6             11              9             99
Markdown                         2             36              0             72
TeX                              1             13              0             41
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
JavaScript                       2              0              0              7
JSON                             1              0              0              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            82           1730           2513           4255
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   197  Alexey Izmailov
    55  mjachi
    32  gdeskos
    27  Matthew Meeker
    10  Brendan Keith
     1  Georgios (Yorgos) Deskos
     1  dependabot[bot]
editorialbot commented 7 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 883

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 7 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1063/5.0064394 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7254149 is OK
- 10.1017/S0022112094001886 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(97)00036-2 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
editorialbot commented 7 months ago

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 7 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

arfon commented 7 months ago

@alizma - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

alizma commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

alizma commented 6 months ago

Hi @arfon is there any chance we could get an update regarding the timeline for this review? Thank you!

alizma commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

crvernon commented 6 months ago

@alizma we are working down the backlog steadily, thanks for your patience!

crvernon commented 6 months ago

@jbytecode I know this one may be a little out of area of interest a little, but would you mind taking this one on as editor?

crvernon commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot invite @jbytecode as editor

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

jbytecode commented 6 months ago

@crvernon - Though this submission isn't within my expertise area, I could have edited this perhaps (because of DS area), but I currently have too much workload. Hoping to help out in future submissions.

crvernon commented 6 months ago

No problem at all @jbytecode! Thanks for the quick notification!

crvernon commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot invite @HaoZeke as editor

:wave: @HaoZeke do you have availability to take this one on?

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

HaoZeke commented 6 months ago

Thanks for the ping @crvernon. It isn't directly in my area of expertise but I think I can handle this one :)

crvernon commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot assign @HaoZeke as editor

Excellent @HaoZeke! Thanks so much!

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

Assigned! @HaoZeke is now the editor

HaoZeke commented 6 months ago

👋 @alizma I will facilitate the review of your paper/software as the editor. The first step will be to find reviewers, so I will start contacting potential reviewers over the weekend.

If you have any suggestions for potential reviewers, then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). Feel free to use the list of volunteers here or the authors of the similar papers.

HaoZeke commented 6 months ago

hi @ashwinvis @dl11g11 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

HaoZeke commented 6 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 6 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

alizma commented 6 months ago

Hi @HaoZeke, thank you for being our editor!

We'd like to suggest @msandre and @philbucher as potential reviewers. We also reached out to others, we'll let you know if they would be interested.

HaoZeke commented 6 months ago

hi @msandre @philbucher 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

philbucher commented 6 months ago

Hi, Thanks for the offer. Unfortunately this seems very far from my personal field of expertise, so I cannot do it. I think the group of Thorsten Lutz at the IAG of the university of Stuttgart could be a good fit. To my knowledge they are not using GitHub, so you would have to reach out via email

ashwinvis commented 5 months ago

@HaoZeke thanks for the invite. It looks like a novel and interesting work. Unfortunately I am occupied with some work related commitments for the coming months.

I can suggest @paroomk and @lguas who should have the expertise to review this.

HaoZeke commented 5 months ago

hi @parmook, @lguas and @p-costa 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

P.S. Thanks @ashwinvis and @philbucher for the prompt response and potential reviewers.

p-costa commented 5 months ago

Hi @HaoZeke, thanks for the invitation. Unfortunately I have too much on my plate right now, so I won't be able to review it.

ashwinvis commented 5 months ago

@HaoZeke You have a typo in your mention it should be @paroomk.

HaoZeke commented 5 months ago

hi @paroomk 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

P.S. Thanks @ashwinvis for catching the typo.

paroomk commented 5 months ago

Hi @HaoZeke, sure. Happy to do it!

On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 6:00 AM Rohit Goswami @.***> wrote:

hi @paroomk https://github.com/paroomk 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

P.S. Thanks @ashwinvis https://github.com/ashwinvis for catching the typo.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6506#issuecomment-2088290873, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC5RYZ7D7KL7BC4LX5ENU6LZADDLRAVCNFSM6AAAAABE5BMLHCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBYGI4TAOBXGM . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

HaoZeke commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot add @paroomk as reviewer

@paroomk thanks for the prompt response, once we have one more reviewer I will start the review thread :)

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

@paroomk added to the reviewers list!

alizma commented 5 months ago

Hi, we'd also like to suggest jaimeliew1 as a potential reviewer who has done similar work.

HaoZeke commented 5 months ago

hi @jaimeliew1 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

crvernon commented 4 months ago

:wave: @HaoZeke - could you staring pinging a more reviewers to see if we can get this one in review? It looks like you only need one more to get it going. Thanks!

HaoZeke commented 4 months ago

hi @olivecha, @atismer 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

atismer commented 4 months ago

@HaoZeke - thank you for keeping me in mind for the review. But, I'm sorry, I don't have time to review your collaboration in time.

HaoZeke commented 4 months ago

hi @bhajay, @antviro 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

olivecha commented 4 months ago

Hi,

I would be available to review this.

On Jun 3, 2024, at 5:09 PM, Rohit Goswami @.***> wrote:

hi @bhajay https://github.com/bhajay, @antviro https://github.com/antviro 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6506#issuecomment-2146127659, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASX4ZJM7TIQCLEFEERJPPSDZFTLQLAVCNFSM6AAAAABE5BMLHCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNBWGEZDONRVHE. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

HaoZeke commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot add @olivecha as reviewer

Thanks for accepting

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

@olivecha added to the reviewers list!

HaoZeke commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6838.

antviro commented 4 months ago

hi @bhajay, @antviro 👋 would you be interested in and available to review this JOSS submission? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If not, could you recommend any potential reviewers?

I see there are already two assigned reviewers, perhaps I am not needed anymore... But otherwise i can review it.