search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
707 stars 37 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Aurora: An open-source python implementation of the EMTF package for magnetotelluric data processing using MTH5 and mt_metadata #6520

Closed editorialbot closed 3 months ago

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@kkappler<!--end-author-handle-- (karl kappler) Repository: https://github.com/simpeg/aurora Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: 0.3.12 Editor: !--editor-->@diehlpk<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @blsqr, @sinanozaydin Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d22a8379f812eb1fa42dd1a9bddad37"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d22a8379f812eb1fa42dd1a9bddad37/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d22a8379f812eb1fa42dd1a9bddad37/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7d22a8379f812eb1fa42dd1a9bddad37)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @kkappler. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@kkappler if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
diehlpk commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Hello @diehlpk, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review
rmsare commented 3 months ago

Thanks for reaching out. No, I am not able to review this paper at this time.

On Fri, May 17, 2024, 08:48 The Open Journals editorial robot < @.***> wrote:

Hello @diehlpk https://github.com/diehlpk, here are the things you can ask me to do:

List all available commands

@editorialbot commands

Add to this issue's reviewers list

@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

Remove from this issue's reviewers list

@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles

@editorialbot list editors

Assign a user as the editor of this submission

@editorialbot assign @username as editor

Remove the editor assigned to this submission

@editorialbot remove editor

Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a

certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)

@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command

@editorialbot generate my checklist

Set a value for version

@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

Set a value for branch

@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

Set a value for repository

@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

Set a value for the archive DOI

@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

Mention the EiCs for the correct track

@editorialbot ping track-eic

Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file

@editorialbot check repository

Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs

@editorialbot check references

Generates the pdf paper

@editorialbot generate pdf

Recommends the submission for acceptance

@editorialbot recommend-accept

Generates a LaTeX preprint file

@editorialbot generate preprint

Flag submission with questionable scope

@editorialbot query scope

Get a link to the complete list of reviewers

@editorialbot list reviewers

Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks

@editorialbot create post-review checklist

Open the review issue

@editorialbot start review

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6520#issuecomment-2117885528, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3QSRGI2RG6MPZLAABAF6TZCYRDXAVCNFSM6AAAAABFCC6EGWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJXHA4DKNJSHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

diehlpk commented 3 months ago

Hi @ArcticSnow do you have time to review this paper?

diehlpk commented 3 months ago

Hi @loyalliu do you have time to review this paper?

diehlpk commented 3 months ago

Hi @AnkitBarik do you have time to review this paper?

AnkitBarik commented 3 months ago

@diehlpk I would be happy to review it from a software point of view, but I am not a subject matter expert to the point where I can judge the accuracy of the work. If that works, feel free to add me as a reviewer.

kkappler commented 3 months ago

Hi @diehlpk, this paper was reviewed internally at USGS before submission by Michael Mitchell -- github handle is @micmitch -- perhaps JOSS can use this review as well?

diehlpk commented 3 months ago

Hi @sinanozaydin do you have time to review this paper?

sinanozaydin commented 3 months ago

Hello @diehlpk, I can review this paper but only after 11 July. Currently, I am very busy with fieldwork and will be going away soon.

diehlpk commented 3 months ago

@sinanozaydin that sounds good.

diehlpk commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot add @sinanozaydin as reviewer

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

@sinanozaydin added to the reviewers list!

diehlpk commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6832.

diehlpk commented 3 months ago

Hi @diehlpk, this paper was reviewed internally at USGS before submission by Michael Mitchell -- github handle is @micmitch -- perhaps JOSS can use this review as well?

That would be a conflict of interest. I found a second reviewer and started the review.