[PRE REVIEW]: COBRAPRO: A MATLAB toolbox for Physics-based Battery Modeling and Co-simulation Parameter Optimization

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@COBRAPROsimulator<!--end-author-handle-- (Sara Ha) Repository: https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@mbarzegary<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @yuefan98, @BradyPlanden, @brosaplanella Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/54273964eb00e1e54308c19d54518891"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/54273964eb00e1e54308c19d54518891/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/54273964eb00e1e54308c19d54518891/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/54273964eb00e1e54308c19d54518891)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @COBRAPROsimulator. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@COBRAPROsimulator if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.05 s (1136.1 files/s, 139515.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MATLAB                          52            771           2787           2832
TeX                              1             20              0            217
Markdown                         2             36              0            191
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            56            828           2791           3258
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    83  COBRAPROsimulator
     1  CO-simulation BatteRy modeling for Accelerated PaRameter Optimization (COBRAPRO)

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1097

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1149/1.2221597 is OK
- 10.1149/2.0301603jes is OK
- 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125966 is OK
- 10.1149/1945-7111/ab7bd7 is OK
- 10.1149/2.0551509jes is OK
- 10.1149/2.0321816jes is OK
- 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9050 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.309 is OK
- 10.1149/2.0291607jes is OK
- 10.1149/2.0171711jes is OK
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.083 is OK
- 10.4271/2023-01-5047 is OK
- 10.1149/1945-7111/ac201c is OK
- 10.1149/1945-7111/ac22c8 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.01.003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.07.002 is OK
- 10.1149/1945-7111/ad1293 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: COMSOL Multiphysics© v. 6.2
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Battery Design Module User’s Guide, COMSOL Multiph...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: fastDFN

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[kyleniemeyer]

Hello @COBRAPROsimulator, thanks for your interest in JOSS. Unfortunately, we do not have an editor in this area available to edit this submission at the moment, so I have to place this on our waitlist until someone frees up.

In the meantime, any reviewer suggestions would be welcome.

[COBRAPROsimulator]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @COBRAPROsimulator, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[COBRAPROsimulator]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[COBRAPROsimulator]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[COBRAPROsimulator]

Thank you @kyleniemeyer! Here is a list of potential reviewers who already agreed to review for JOSS:

• leeberty84
• yuefan98
• BradyPlanden
• DEARLIBS
• medullar
• yaomz16
• tomtranter
• EricaEgg

Here is a list of potential reviewers who are not on the JOSS reviewer list:

• petermattia
• martinjrobins
• robertwtimms

[COBRAPROsimulator]

@kyleniemeyer, could you clarify if you mean that there is no JOSS editor suitable for COBRAPRO? Or do you mean that there is an appropriate JOSS editor for our code, but that they are not available at this moment (we noticed Rachel Kurchin could be a good match for our paper)?

If the latter, would you be able to give us an estimated time of when our paper would be assigned an editor?

Thank you, Sara

[COBRAPROsimulator]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[COBRAPROsimulator]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[COBRAPROsimulator]

@editorialbot generate preprint

[editorialbot]

:page_facing_up: Preprint file created: Find it here in the Artifacts list :page_facing_up:

[kyleniemeyer]

@COBRAPROsimulator I mean that we do not currently have one available - we limit the workload of our editors and how many simultaneous submissions they are handling. I can't quite predict how long it will take, because we have a queue of submissions.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @mbarzegary as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[mbarzegary]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @mbarzegary is now the editor

[mbarzegary]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[mbarzegary]

Hi @BradyPlanden, @yuefan98, @DEARLIBS, @yaomz16, @EricaEgg 👋 Considering your expertise, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? As you may know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06540/joss.06540/10.21105.joss.06540.pdf Software: https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO

[yuefan98]

Hi Mojtaba,

I would be happy to help with this. Is there a specific deadline for this review.

Best, Yuefan Ji

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 9:16 AM Mojtaba Barzegari @.***> wrote:

Hi @BradyPlanden https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/BradyPlanden__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypIGIH1hgE$, @yuefan98 https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/yuefan98__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypIh5NTIec$, @DEARLIBS https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/DEARLIBS__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypItUSZlhI$, @yaomz16 https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/yaomz16__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypInY-1dSU$, @EricaEgg https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/EricaEgg__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypIg2nBJuQ$ 👋 Considering your expertise, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? As you may know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypIW4T0LBc$

Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06540/joss.06540/10.21105.joss.06540.pdf https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06540/joss.06540/10.21105.joss.06540.pdf__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypItq2Xry4$ Software: https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypIVoxsMKs$

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6540*issuecomment-2079596061__;Iw!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypI7an4JUw$, or unsubscribe https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXFQY7L5S72YXCBATTHQC33Y7JVV7AVCNFSM6AAAAABFIGAEKWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANZZGU4TMMBWGE__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!gSLIWm0L-iXK9ojzwD7QGfsBHcS27mBcZJhLfCessOm_av95yTuiwxdwSJpwvIPj5NoVZok-pOtfJypIC3sfn4M$ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[yaomz16]

Hi Mojtaba,

Sorry I cannot review this paper for now, as I am extremely busy these days.

Thanks,

Archie (yaomz16)

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:16 AM Mojtaba Barzegari @.***> wrote:

Hi @BradyPlanden https://github.com/BradyPlanden, @yuefan98 https://github.com/yuefan98, @DEARLIBS https://github.com/DEARLIBS, @yaomz16 https://github.com/yaomz16, @EricaEgg https://github.com/EricaEgg 👋 Considering your expertise, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? As you may know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06540/joss.06540/10.21105.joss.06540.pdf Software: https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6540#issuecomment-2079596061, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH2KLTA5BXLCR4DWTAINW3TY7JVV7AVCNFSM6AAAAABFIGAEKWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANZZGU4TMMBWGE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[mbarzegary]

@yuefan98 we aim for reviews to be completed within about 2-4 weeks after the start of the revision process.

[mbarzegary]

Hi @TomTranter 👋 Do you have time for reviewing another battery modeling work for JOSS?

Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06540/joss.06540/10.21105.joss.06540.pdf Software: https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO

[TomTranter]

Hi @mbarzegary unfortunately not

[BradyPlanden]

@mbarzegary Happy to review this.

[mbarzegary]

@editorialbot add @yuefan98 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@yuefan98 added to the reviewers list!

[mbarzegary]

@editorialbot add @BradyPlanden as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@BradyPlanden added to the reviewers list!

[mbarzegary]

Hi @ma-sadeghi 👋 Do you have time for reviewing another battery modeling work for JOSS?

Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06540/joss.06540/10.21105.joss.06540.pdf Software: https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO

[mbarzegary]

Hi @jepegit 👋 Since you have recently published your software, would you be willing to review a battery modeling work for JOSS?

Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06540/joss.06540/10.21105.joss.06540.pdf Software: https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO

[mbarzegary]

Hi @jtock, @joshuaeh, @mdmurbach, @olejandro, @mfleschutz 👋 Considering your expertise, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? As you may know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06540/joss.06540/10.21105.joss.06540.pdf Software: https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO

[mfleschutz]

Hi @mbarzegary,

Thank you for considering me for this review. Unfortunately, I am unable to commit to reviewing this submission for JOSS at this time.

Best regards

[joshuaeh]

Hi @mbarzegary,

I appreciate the vote of confidence, I wouldn't be able to give meaningful insights in the area unfortunately.

JH

[TomTranter]

I suggest @brosaplanella

[TomTranter]

Also @DrSOKane

[mbarzegary]

Thanks @TomTranter

[mbarzegary]

Hi @brosaplanella and @DrSOKane 👋 Considering your expertise, would any of you be willing to review this battery modeling work for JOSS? As you may know, we carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.06540/joss.06540/10.21105.joss.06540.pdf Software: https://github.com/COBRAPROsimulator/COBRAPRO

[brosaplanella]

Hi! I am at full capacity ATM. The earliest I can guarantee a review is the 5th of July. If that works, please assign me to it.

[mbarzegary]

@brosaplanella thanks. As you know, we usually aim to finish the first review round in 4 weeks, but I think it's worth to prolong it a bit to have your review as well. I assign you as the reviewer and you can do it early July.