openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
694 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: DWIQC: A Python package for preprocessing and quality assurance of diffusion weighted images #6570

Open editorialbot opened 3 months ago

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@danielasay<!--end-author-handle-- (Daniel Asay) Repository: https://github.com/harvard-nrg/dwiqc Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 1.5.1 Editor: !--editor-->@samhforbes<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@mwegrzyn<!--end-reviewers-list-- Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/44b74203d89a663d033942a1d5103ba3"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/44b74203d89a663d033942a1d5103ba3/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/44b74203d89a663d033942a1d5103ba3/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/44b74203d89a663d033942a1d5103ba3)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @danielasay. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@danielasay if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 3 months ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.073 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.28678 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01185-5 is OK
- 10.1002/ima.22005 is OK
- 10.1385/NI:5:1:11 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.16 s (225.8 files/s, 141856.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                             1             97            413          17384
Python                          19            816            368           2064
reStructuredText                 4            326            282            473
YAML                             6              6             24            135
TeX                              1              6              0             94
Markdown                         2             16              0             46
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             2              4              7             21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            36           1279           1095          20243
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   523  Daniel Asay
editorialbot commented 3 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 507

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 3 months ago

Dear author, @danielasay , thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help process the initial steps. Before we proceed, please can you have a look at the following points:

Note, I've added the waitlisted label. This is because our editors with expertise in neuro-imaging/MRI are all currently preoccupied with other submissions. We will proceed to look for/assign an editor once one becomes available.

danielasay commented 3 months ago

Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, thanks for your message! I've added a contribution section to the README per your suggestion. Please let me know if there's anything else you'd like me to do. Thank you.

Daniel

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 2 months ago

@emdupre @samhforbes this submission is waitlisted since editors like yourself are currently handling many other submissions. Do you think that this submission would be something you could help with once you are available?

samhforbes commented 2 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Assigned! @samhforbes is now the editor

samhforbes commented 1 month ago

@jonbmartin, @leon-k-martin, @rmarkello would any of you be interested in helping us review this paper?

jonbmartin commented 1 month ago

Hi, I won’t be able to review this one. Thank you for asking!

Jonathan

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 6:50 AM Sam Forbes @.***> wrote:

@jonbmartin https://github.com/jonbmartin, @leon-k-martin https://github.com/leon-k-martin, @rmarkello https://github.com/rmarkello would any of you be interested in helping us review this paper?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6570#issuecomment-2122456250, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKVCUT65QSZRCQCVBGPA6TDZDMYG5AVCNFSM6AAAAABFS7ZMYSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMRSGQ2TMMRVGA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

samhforbes commented 2 weeks ago

Hi @VincentStimper, @cmaumet, @mwegrzyn would any of you be interested in helping us review this paper?

mwegrzyn commented 2 weeks ago

Thank you for asking. I would be glad to review the paper.

Best, Martin

samhforbes commented 2 weeks ago

@editorialbot add @mwegrzyn as reviewer

editorialbot commented 2 weeks ago

@mwegrzyn added to the reviewers list!

VincentStimper commented 1 week ago

Hi all,

Unfortunately, I currently do not have the capacity to review this paper since I just started a new job.

Best regards, Vincent

cmaumet commented 1 week ago

Hello everyone. I am sorry but I cannot accept this review at this time.

samhforbes commented 1 week ago

Hi @spinicist, @kerkelae would either of you be interested in helping us review this paper?

spinicist commented 1 week ago

Hello, I know a few diffusion experts who might be interested in this but I don't know if they are in the JOSS database already. If you drop me an e-mail (my work one is easy to find, look at the READMEs for my main repos) then I can provide contact details.

samhforbes commented 4 days ago

Will do thanks @spinicist