openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
709 stars 38 forks source link

[REVIEW]: hf_hydrodata: A Python package for accessing hydrologic simulations and observations across the United States #6623

Closed editorialbot closed 2 months ago

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@amy-defnet<!--end-author-handle-- (Amy Defnet) Repository: https://github.com/hydroframe/hf_hydrodata Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.1.12 Editor: !--editor-->@rwegener2<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @thodson-usgs, @alessandroamaranto Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.12700800

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0f71e8275dbff415d2f76e1089c34dc8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0f71e8275dbff415d2f76e1089c34dc8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0f71e8275dbff415d2f76e1089c34dc8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0f71e8275dbff415d2f76e1089c34dc8)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@thodson-usgs & @alessandroamaranto, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @rwegener2 know.

Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest

Checklists

📝 Checklist for @thodson-usgs

📝 Checklist for @alessandroamaranto

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

:tada::tada::tada: Congratulations on your paper acceptance! :tada::tada::tada:

If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:

Markdown:
[![DOI](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06623/status.svg)](https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06623)

HTML:
<a style="border-width:0" href="https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06623">
  <img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06623/status.svg" alt="DOI badge" >
</a>

reStructuredText:
.. image:: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06623/status.svg
   :target: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.06623

This is how it will look in your documentation:

DOI

We need your help!

The Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:

kthyng commented 2 months ago

@amy-defnet Please register at https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/ if you'd like to review for JOSS in the future!

amy-defnet commented 1 month ago

Thanks, @kthyng! Thank you so much @rwegener2 and @thodson-usgs and @alessandroamaranto for taking the time to review and provide your feedback!