Closed editorialbot closed 1 month ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.04 s (1873.6 files/s, 124311.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 19 357 383 1350
Markdown 10 250 0 689
YAML 11 41 38 444
TeX 1 21 0 260
JSON 16 0 0 178
TOML 1 13 3 117
INI 1 3 6 36
reStructuredText 2 20 29 29
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
Jinja Template 1 7 0 21
Dockerfile 1 9 1 15
make 1 4 7 9
SVG 1 0 1 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 66 733 469 3177
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
60 Hao-Ting Wang
55 Remi Gau
8 dependabot[bot]
6 htwangtw
2 pre-commit-ci[bot]
1 Quentin Dessain
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1068
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.5281/zenodo.8397156 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011942 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01681-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.schres.2005.11.020 is OK
- 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.027 is OK
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1256 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1093/cercor/bhx179 is OK
- 10.12688/mniopenres.12767.2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117126 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.25829 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.12.01.470790 is OK
- 10.1089/brain.2012.0073 is OK
- 10.1101/2023.11.20.567926 is OK
- 10.1038/mp.2013.78 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 is OK
- 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00062 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Investigating the convergence of resting-state fun...
INVALID DOIs
- None
@htwangtw Dear author, thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help process the initial steps. Before we proceed, please can you have a look at the following points:
.bib
file, and call @editorialbot check references
here to check them again. Note I've also added the query scope label. This is because I need some help from the editorial board to determine if this work is in scope for JOSS. This mainly relates to the size of this work in terms of number of lines of code. The scope review by the editorial board will check if this conforms to our substantial scholarly effort criteria, and should take about 2 weeks to complete.
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman the flagged paper is a registered report hence there's no doi yet. I can ask the author to see what's possible.
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman the flagged paper is a registered report hence there's no doi yet. I can ask the author to see what's possible.
@htwangtw that's okay. If it currently has no DOI you can leave it without. Perhaps instead add a URL if you haven't already. Thanks
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman The added URL will be online by Thursday as OSF requires 48 hours to verify.
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.5281/zenodo.8397156 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011942 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01681-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.schres.2005.11.020 is OK
- 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.027 is OK
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1256 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1093/cercor/bhx179 is OK
- 10.12688/mniopenres.12767.2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117126 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.25829 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.12.01.470790 is OK
- 10.1089/brain.2012.0073 is OK
- 10.1101/2023.11.20.567926 is OK
- 10.1038/mp.2013.78 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 is OK
- 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00062 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Investigating the convergence of resting-state fun...
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.5281/zenodo.8397156 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011942 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01681-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.schres.2005.11.020 is OK
- 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.027 is OK
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1256 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1093/cercor/bhx179 is OK
- 10.12688/mniopenres.12767.2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117126 is OK
- 10.17605/OSF.IO/T7JKZ is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.25829 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.12.01.470790 is OK
- 10.1089/brain.2012.0073 is OK
- 10.1101/2023.11.20.567926 is OK
- 10.1038/mp.2013.78 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 is OK
- 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00062 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman all that I can do on my side are good. Are we just waiting on the assessment of scope now?
@htwangtw yes we were waiting for the scope review. We've just concluded the review and I can share that is was determined this work may be in scope for JOSS. As such I will proceed to find a handing editor.
@htwangtw I've just waitlisted this submission since all editors in this domain are currently handling other submissions. We will assign an editor as soon as one becomes available. Thanks for your patience.
@editorialbot invite @spholmes as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
Sorry @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I have to decline. I just recieved three requests for reviews in the next few weeks and now traveling, so I have to pass on this one which is quite far from my expertise.
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman We can extend to the Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences topic for potential editor, if that helps!
@htwangtw unfortunately all editors, including the that domain, are busy. I'll assign one as soon as one becomes available. Apologies for the delay so far.
@editorialbot invite @Nikoleta-v3 as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@Nikoleta-v3 :wave:
@editorialbot invite @mstimberg as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Happy to edit this submission!
Assigned! @mstimberg is now the editor
:wave: @htwangtw I will be the editor for your submission, looking forward to working with you again (you were a reviewer for a submission I edited :blush: ). The first step is to look for reviewers. I will do this mostly over email, so don't be surprised if you won't see much activity here. If you have any suggestions for potential reviewers, then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Thanks @htwangtw, this gives me plenty to work with.
Hi folks,
thanks for the offer.
I would love to review this submission but unfortunately, my schedule is rather packed until mid-July and thus, I won't have to do the work this deserves. However, @htwangtw if you want to chat about output structures and metadata, please let me know. I should definitely have 1-2 h for this.
Thanks and sorry again.
Best, Peer
@editorialbot add @jdkent as reviewer
Thanks a lot for helping out!
@jdkent added to the reviewers list!
Thanks for your patience @htwangtw and @jdkent – I am still trying to find more reviewers. I have contacted a few more potential candidates over email, hopefully I'll hear back from one of them soon.
@editorialbot add @shnizzedy as reviewer
Many thanks for joining us!
@shnizzedy added to the reviewers list!
@htwangtw Apologies again for the long delay in finding reviewers – it doesn't take that long usually… But I am very happy to have @jdkent and @shnizzedy on board, looking forward to a smooth and constructive reviewing process!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/7061.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@htwangtw<!--end-author-handle-- (Hao-Ting Wang) Repository: https://github.com/bids-apps/giga_connectome Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: 0.5.0 Editor: !--editor-->@mstimberg<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @jdkent, @shnizzedy Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @htwangtw. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@htwangtw if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: