search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
712 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: Osier: A Python package for multi-objective energy system optimization #6655

Closed editorialbot closed 3 months ago

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@samgdotson<!--end-author-handle-- (Samuel Dotson) Repository: https://github.com/arfc/osier Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v0.3.0 Editor: !--editor-->@prashjha<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @fredshone, @victoraalves Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/183a04edba2d4952fa1e30c419a844b3"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/183a04edba2d4952fa1e30c419a844b3/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/183a04edba2d4952fa1e30c419a844b3/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/183a04edba2d4952fa1e30c419a844b3)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @samgdotson. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@samgdotson if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.04 s (947.4 files/s, 196048.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          15            575            872           2155
Markdown                         9            113              0            420
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0           2332            316
TeX                              1             12              0            200
YAML                             3             12              8             84
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
reStructuredText                 2             16             64              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            35            740           3284           3219
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   286  Sam Dotson
     7  samgdotson
     2  Samuel Dotson
     1  yardasol
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1154

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 5 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/s10479-015-1791-y is OK
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990567 is OK
- 10.1088/1748-9326/ab875d is OK
- 10.1007/s12532-011-0026-8 is OK
- 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101908 is OK
- 10.1287/inte.6.4.102 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.01.036 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114728 is OK
- 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102913 is OK
- 10.3390/en12163046 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: 2023 Annual Technology Baseline (ATB)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Openmod - Open Energy Modelling Initiative

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

kyleniemeyer commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot invite @prashjha as editor

Hi @prashjha, could you edit this submission?

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

prashjha commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Assigned! @prashjha is now the editor

prashjha commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot help

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Hello @prashjha, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review
prashjha commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot check repository

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.04 s (977.1 files/s, 202205.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          15            575            872           2155
Markdown                         9            113              0            420
Jupyter Notebook                 3              0           2332            316
TeX                              1             12              0            200
YAML                             3             12              8             84
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
reStructuredText                 2             16             64              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            35            740           3284           3219
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   286  Sam Dotson
     7  samgdotson
     2  Samuel Dotson
     1  yardasol
prashjha commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1154

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

prashjha commented 4 months ago

Hi @samgdotson, could you please suggest few reviewers from this list to get started?

prashjha commented 4 months ago

Howdy @samgdotson, please can you share some potential reviewers from the link in the above comment?

samgdotson commented 3 months ago

Hi @prashjha, my apologies for the delay!

From the list you shared, I would recommend (in no particular order)

Thanks!

prashjha commented 3 months ago

Howdy! @Jgoldfar, @sevberg, @victoraalves, @fredshone, and @jtock, would you be interested in reviewing the JOSS submission above (pdf link)? The corresponding software is at this link.

This link covers almost everything about the review process; I will be happy to help with more information.

Please let me know if you are interested. Thank you!

fredshone commented 3 months ago

I can review this

On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 19:29, Prashant K. Jha @.***> wrote:

Howdy! @jgoldfar https://github.com/jgoldfar, @sevberg https://github.com/sevberg, @victoraalves https://github.com/victoraalves, @fredshone https://github.com/fredshone, and @jtock https://github.com/jtock, would you be interested in reviewing the JOSS submission above (pdf link https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.06655/joss.06655/10.21105.joss.06655.pdf)? The corresponding software is at this link https://github.com/arfc/osier .

This link https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html covers almost everything about the review process; I will be happy to help with more information.

Please let me know if you are interested. Thank you!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6655#issuecomment-2183066989, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGJJMPOAIAWPBSNNEH7JK53ZIRIFBAVCNFSM6AAAAABGS6ECV2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOBTGA3DMOJYHE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

victoraalves commented 3 months ago

Hi! I am more than happy to review it.

prashjha commented 3 months ago

Hello @fredshone and @victoraalves, thank you for accepting the invitation to review. Cheers.

prashjha commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot add @fredshone as reviewer

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

@fredshone added to the reviewers list!

prashjha commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot add @victoraalves as reviewer

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

@victoraalves added to the reviewers list!

prashjha commented 3 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 3 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6919.