Closed editorialbot closed 4 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.12 s (1478.1 files/s, 347806.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C/C++ Header 48 1512 2011 14237
C++ 49 1009 1484 9824
reStructuredText 12 1402 1308 2448
CMake 28 256 470 1265
Python 11 272 292 1180
Markdown 7 234 0 966
Fortran 90 2 79 62 633
YAML 10 53 34 522
make 3 57 55 178
TeX 1 13 0 164
diff 4 39 155 118
JSON 1 0 0 111
Bourne Shell 2 9 29 38
HTML 2 0 1 36
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 181 4943 5902 31746
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
258 Jonah Maxwell Miller
233 Jeffrey H Peterson
196 Jonah Miller
178 Richard Berger
174 Christopher Mauney
148 Daniel Holladay
54 Karen Chung-Yen Tsai
40 Alexander Holas
38 Jeff Peterson
37 Josh Dolence
34 Ann Elisabet Wills - 298385
29 Gopinath Subramanian
28 Benjamin Joel Musick
25 Christopher Michael Mauney
23 Anna Pietarila Graham
15 AlexHls
10 Ben R. Ryan
10 mauneyc-LANL
8 jdolence
7 Christoph Junghans
7 Karen C. Tsai
5 Daniel Alphin Holladay
5 github-actions[bot]
4 Brandon Barker
4 mari2895
3 Shane Patrick Fogerty
3 c0sm0-kramer
2 Mariam Gogilashvili
2 Peter Brady
2 Shane Patrick Fogerty - 322405
1 Ben Ryan
1 Chad Meyer
1 Matt Stack
1 chadmeyer
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.3847/1538-4365/ab007f is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4365/ab09fc is OK
- 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/44 is OK
- 10.1109/TPDS.2021.3097283 is OK
- 10.1145/3388333.3388649 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2206.08957 is OK
- 10.1145/2807591.2807623 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Sesame: The Los Alamos National Laboratory Equatio...
- 10.1088/0264-9381/27/11/114103 may be a valid DOI for title: A new open-source code for spherically symmetric s...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Stellar Collapse: Microphysics
- 10.2172/1765849 may be a valid DOI for title: EOSPAC User’s Manual: V.6.5
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Numerical Recipes with Source Code CD-ROM 3rd Edit...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CUDA, release: 10.2.89
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Parallel programming in OpenMP
INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1797
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Author (Daniel A. Holladay) is missing affiliation.
Hi @Yurlungur, it looks like the paper compilation error is coming from the dash before orcid
field in Daniel Hollday's author block.
@editorialbot assign me as editor
I'm going to edit this submission myself.
Assigned! @kyleniemeyer is now the editor
Hi @Yurlungur, it looks like the paper compilation error is coming from the dash before
orcid
field in Daniel Hollday's author block.
Oops. Hopefully fixed now. Thanks @kyleniemeyer !
@editorialbot generate pdf
:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with affiliations for Chad Meyer, perhaps the affiliations index need quoting?.
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
OK NOW it's fixed. Sorry about that!
Hi @kyleniemeyer what is the status currently of the submission? Should it move into review?
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@Yurlungur Sorry for the delay—busy term! I need to find and assign at least two reviewers, before this progresses into the review issue. If you have any recommendations, those would be welcome.
Hello @parikshitbajpai @corykinney @fwitte would any of you be able to review this submission for JOSS? It describes a library, Singularity-EOS, for equations of state.
Hello @parikshitbajpai @corykinney @fwitte would any of you be able to review this submission for JOSS? It describes a library, Singularity-EOS, for equations of state.
Hi @kyleniemeyer, I can review this but I'm quite busy until May 30 so I won't be able to do it before then. I'll be open to review if it can wait till then.
@Yurlungur Sorry for the delay—busy term! I need to find and assign at least two reviewers, before this progresses into the review issue. If you have any recommendations, those would be welcome.
No problem. Thanks @kyleniemeyer ! Regarding reviewers... I'm not sure of their availability but some names that occur to me are zingale, stevenrbrandt, felker, eloisabentivegna.
From skimming the list of reviewers on the JOSS website, I could also suggest dshawul, chongchonghe, lelaus, victorapm, esclapez, MakisH
Hi and thanks for the invitation. Unfortunately I am not experienced with C++, and more on the side of applying EOS for modeling instead of writing them myself. Therefore I would like to pass on this.
Other ideas for reviewers could be people from the CoolProp ecosystem (ibell or jowr for example).
@parikshitbajpai that timeline works, thanks!
@editorialbot add @parikshitbajpai as reviewer
@parikshitbajpai added to the reviewers list!
@esclapez would you be available to review this submission to JOSS? It describes a library, Singularity-EOS, for equations of state.
Hi @Yurlungur and @kyleniemeyer: I am not available at the moment. You seem to have a long list of good candidates, though!
@kyleniemeyer I have limited experience with C++, so due to the size of the codebase for this project, I don't think I would be the right person to review it, unfortunately.
For reviewers, how about athomps?
Hello @athomps, are you available to review this submission for JOSS? It is about an equation of state library, Singularity-EOS. The repo is at https://github.com/lanl/singularity-eos and the draft paper is here: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.06658/joss.06658/10.21105.joss.06658.pdf
If you aren't familiar with JOSS (the Journal of Open Source Software), the journal publishes articles about open source research software, where the reviews happen in the open on GitHub.
My colleague Svetoslav Nikolov @snikolov3 is interested and has kindly agreed to provide some feedback.
@snikolov3 Will you review this JOSS contribution? It is about an equation of state library, Singularity-EOS. The repo is at https://github.com/lanl/singularity-eos and the draft paper is here: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.06658/joss.06658/10.21105.joss.06658.pdf
@athomps Sure happy to do that. When do you need this by?
@snikolov3 thanks! We ask reviewers to complete their reviews within two or three weeks if possible. However, JOSS's review process is a bit different, since it is checklist-based and we encourage interaction between reviewers and the authors via the review issue. So, you don't have to do it all at once.
A bit more about the reviewing for JOSS here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html#
@editorialbot add @snikolov3 as reviewer
@snikolov3 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6805.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@Yurlungur<!--end-author-handle-- (Jonah Miller) Repository: https://github.com/lanl/singularity-eos Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.8.0 Editor: !--editor-->@kyleniemeyer<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @parikshitbajpai, @snikolov3 Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Yurlungur. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@Yurlungur if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: