search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
703 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: ChainoPy: A Python Library for Discrete Time Markov Chain based stochastic analysis #6675

Closed editorialbot closed 2 months ago

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@aadya940<!--end-author-handle-- (Aadya Chinubhai) Repository: https://github.com/aadya940/chainopy Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): master Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@mooniean<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @braniii, @MichalisPanayides Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/486cf1a43c0079e0628e044215168ad6"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/486cf1a43c0079e0628e044215168ad6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/486cf1a43c0079e0628e044215168ad6/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/486cf1a43c0079e0628e044215168ad6)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @aadya940. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@aadya940 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (1091.0 files/s, 340473.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          14            390            395            998
Jupyter Notebook                 6              0           7850            555
Markdown                         4             76              0            215
Cython                           5             33              0            137
YAML                             3             28              0            103
TeX                              1             15              0             73
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            35            554           8253           2116
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    98  aadya940
    44  Aadya Chinubhai
editorialbot commented 4 months ago 
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Markov chain neural networks
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PyDTMC
- 10.1109/mcse.2010.118 may be a valid DOI for title: Cython: The best of both worlds
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Array programming with NumPy
- No DOI given, and none found for title: SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific c...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance dee...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Numba: A llvm-based python jit compiler
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Convergence rates for Markov chains
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Regime switching models

INVALID DOIs

- None
editorialbot commented 4 months ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Author (Aadya A. Chinubhai) is missing affiliation.

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1520

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 2-Clause "Simplified" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

crvernon commented 4 months ago

@aadya940 - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

crvernon commented 4 months ago

@aadya940 - in the meantime, could you work on fixing the author affiliation issue here:

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Author (Aadya A. Chinubhai) is missing affiliation.

You will also need to reduce the length of your paper to the JOSS requirement of being between 250-1000 words (see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#what-should-my-paper-contain).

Thank you!

crvernon commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot invite @mooniean as editor

:wave: @mooniean - Let me know if you have the capacity to take this one on as editor. Thanks!

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

crvernon commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot assign @mooniean as editor

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

Assigned! @mooniean is now the editor

mooniean commented 4 months ago

Hi @aadya940! I'll be editing your paper!

Have you addressed the issues mentioned by Chris? If so, if we do @editorialbot generate pdf we can see the new version of the pdf.

Do you have any reviewer suggestions, before I contact anyone?

aadya940 commented 4 months ago

Hello @mooniean , Thanks for taking up the time to do the review. The pdf compiles fine now locally. However, I haven't reduced the length of the paper yet. Would it be fine if I take some time to do this? I'll try to do it ASAP.

aadya940 commented 4 months ago

Hello @mooniean , I've updated the paper. Its 920 words excluding bibliography. Looks like we can move ahead. Thank You very much!!

mooniean commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

mooniean commented 4 months ago

@aadya940 it looks good! Do you have any suggestions for reviewers?

aadya940 commented 3 months ago

@mooniean Nope. I guess we could proceed forward :-)

mooniean commented 3 months ago

Hello 👋 @tbrown122387 @thomaspinder and @braniii - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS?

https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6675

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

tbrown122387 commented 3 months ago

Hello 👋 @tbrown122387 @thomaspinder and @braniii - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS?

https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6675

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

I'm too busy. Sorry!

braniii commented 3 months ago

Hi @mooniean I am on conferences till May 24th. If it is fine if I start the review afterwards, I glad to review this submission.

crvernon commented 3 months ago

:wave: @mooniean - let me know if I can lend a hand in helping find another reviewer to kick this one into full review. Thanks!

mooniean commented 3 months ago

Hi @braniii ! are you still happy to review?

mooniean commented 3 months ago

Hello 👋 @MichalisPanayides @RomainAzais - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS?

https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6675

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

braniii commented 3 months ago

Hi @braniii ! are you still happy to review?

@mooniean yes. Should I wait until enough reviewers are found, or can I start already?

mooniean commented 2 months ago

@braniii Thank you! I'll start the review process as soon as there's another reviewer available :) Thank you for your availability!

MichalisPanayides commented 2 months ago

Hello 👋 @MichalisPanayides @RomainAzais - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS?

6675

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Hi there 👋 I'd be happy to review this 😃

mooniean commented 2 months ago

@editorialbot add @braniii as reviewer

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

@braniii added to the reviewers list!

mooniean commented 2 months ago

@editorialbot add @MichalisPanayides as reviewer

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

@MichalisPanayides added to the reviewers list!

mooniean commented 2 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6880.

RomainAzais commented 2 months ago

Hello, Sorry, but I am too busy at the moment. Best

Hello 👋 @MichalisPanayides @RomainAzais - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS?

6675

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html