[PRE REVIEW]: HyperIT: A Python toolbox for an information-theoretic social neuroscience

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@EdoardoChidichimo<!--end-author-handle-- (Edoardo Chidichimo) Repository: https://www.github.com/EdoardoChidichimo/HyperIT Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d89effbe6213f6cd23040355ae8f74cb"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d89effbe6213f6cd23040355ae8f74cb/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d89effbe6213f6cd23040355ae8f74cb/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d89effbe6213f6cd23040355ae8f74cb)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @EdoardoChidichimo. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@EdoardoChidichimo if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.07 s (634.3 files/s, 315195.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      14           2424           2495           9165
SVG                              1              0              0           2671
HTML                             9            428             27           1926
CSS                              4            192             38            779
Python                           6            317            310            736
TeX                              1             12              0            162
Markdown                         2             59              0            132
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0           1187             65
YAML                             2             14             22             44
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
reStructuredText                 5             30             46             21
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            47           3488           4133          15736
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   318  Edoardo Chidichimo

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1419

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1093/scan/nsaa141 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.238701 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0012166 is OK
- 10.3389/frobt.2014.00011 is OK
- 10.1038/s41593-022-01070-0 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1909.02297 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.2109.13186 is OK
- 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x is OK
- 10.1523/ENEURO.0052-18.2018 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1004.2515 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Elements of information theory

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[EdoardoChidichimo]

@editorialbot commands

---

From: The Open Journals editorial robot @.> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2024 10:14:28 AM To: openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc: Edoardo Chidichimo @.>; Mention @.> Subject: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: HyperIT: A Python toolbox for an information-theoretic social neuroscience (Issue #6689)

Submitting author: @EdoardoChidichimohttps://github.com/EdoardoChidichimo (Edoardo Chidichimohttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1179-9757) Repository: https://www.github.com/EdoardoChidichimo/HyperIT Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

[status]https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d89effbe6213f6cd23040355ae8f74cb

Status badge code:

HTML: Markdown:

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @EdoardoChidichimohttps://github.com/EdoardoChidichimo. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@EdoardoChidichimohttps://github.com/EdoardoChidichimo if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of peoplehttps://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/lookup that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbothttps://github.com/editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbothttps://github.com/editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6689, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BD2PPCOKQAXXMIU62HC466LY7YFPJAVCNFSM6AAAAABG556R72VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGI3DQNJRGMZTQMY. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[editorialbot]

Hello @EdoardoChidichimo, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[EdoardoChidichimo]

Suggestions for potential reviewers:

paulbroderson leon-k-martin Saran-nns JuliusWelzel sappelhoff

Please note that I have added two co-authors to the paper. I will remain the corresponding author.

---

From: The Open Journals editorial robot @.> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2024 10:25:21 AM To: openjournals/joss-reviews @.> Cc: Edoardo Chidichimo @.>; Mention @.> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: HyperIT: A Python toolbox for an information-theoretic social neuroscience (Issue #6689)

Hello @EdoardoChidichimohttps://github.com/EdoardoChidichimo, here are the things you can ask me to do:

List all available commands

@editorialbot commands

Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles

@editorialbot list editors

Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command

@editorialbot generate my checklist

Set a value for branch

@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file

@editorialbot check repository

Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs

@editorialbot check references

Generates the pdf paper

@editorialbot generate pdf

Generates a LaTeX preprint file

@editorialbot generate preprint

Get a link to the complete list of reviewers

@editorialbot list reviewers

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6689#issuecomment-2082254185, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BD2PPCOKEUEAY3JZGBHSMRDY7YGYDAVCNFSM6AAAAABG556R72VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBSGI2TIMJYGU. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[oliviaguest]

@likeajumprope @teonbrooks @mooniean @lpantano @AJQuinn @sneakers-the-rat are any of you able to take this on?

[oliviaguest]

@sappelhoff would you be able to take this one on? ☺️

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[arfon]

@editorialbot reject

@EdoardoChidichimo – thanks for your submission to JOSS. Unfortunately, after review by the JOSS editorial team we've determined that this submission doesn't meet our substantial scholarly effort criterion.

Should you expand this submission significantly in the future we'd welcome a resubmission to JOSS.

One possible alternative to JOSS is to follow GitHub's guide on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.