Closed editorialbot closed 4 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.28 s (515.6 files/s, 672458.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV 27 0 0 176993
CSS 3 788 255 3626
C++ 22 503 468 1459
CMake 24 196 180 1187
Markdown 28 261 0 756
C/C++ Header 22 279 419 754
YAML 9 41 20 368
Python 6 62 63 172
TeX 1 13 0 153
HTML 1 7 20 61
TOML 1 0 0 3
SVG 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 145 2150 1425 185533
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
349 Volkan Kumtepeli
174 beckyperriment
31 David Howey
5 dependabot[bot]
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.is.2015.04.007 is OK
- 10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163055 is OK
- 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.09.013 is OK
- 10.1109/DSAA49011.2020.00096 is OK
- 10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163055 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109628 is OK
- 10.1007/s12532-017-0130-5 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: wannesm/dtaidistance v2. 0.0
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The UCR Time Series Classification Archive
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Tslearn, A Machine Learning Toolkit for Time Serie...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The UCR Time Series Classification Archive
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Fast dynamic time warping and clustering in C++
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 2926
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
:wave: @ElektrikAkar - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We are currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.
For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!
@editorialbot invite @logological as editor
Hi @logological, do you think you can take this one on as editor?
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot assign @logological as editor
Assigned! @logological is now the editor
Thank you for your submission, @ElektrikAkar! I will be serving as its editor. At this point I'd like to invite you to suggest to me any reviewers who may be qualified to review this submission. You can search our reviewer database or nominate people you may know from your professional network or through familiarity with their work, but please do not nominate anyone who may have a conflict of interest. I'll meanwhile compile my own list of candidate reviewers.
@adavidzh, @peekxc, @AP6YC, @gagolews, would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?
@adavidzh, @peekxc, @AP6YC, @gagolews, would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?
Hi @logological, I am afraid that in this period I cannot take this on. Thanks.
Apologies, I have too many reviews pending at the moment.
@ElektrikAkar I'm still in the process of trying to find reviewers for this submission. Could you please let me know whether you would like to nominate any reviewers?
@TahiriNadia, @lmcinnes, @taqtiqa-mark, @breznak would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?
@logological it looks very interesting, but I am afraid I do not have enough availability to ensure a timely review. Sorry.
Hi @logological ,
Thank you very much. No worries. I do not know the requirements for a reviewer but I can suggest: @dyigitpolat and @i64 if they are happy to help to review :)
I am available.
Hi, thanks for suggesting me as a reviewer, I am happy to review the paper and the repository.
@logological, thanks for considering me, but I am afraid I do not have availability for a timely review.
@i64 Thanks for volunteering. In order for me to assess your suitability as a reviewer, would you mind providing some background on your expertise in the field of software and in the field of this submission? I may have to double-check on this, but I might also need to know your real-life name or identity, if only to exclude the possibility of there being a conflict of interest. You could provide all this information here or by private e-mail to me at tristan@logological.org.
@logological Of course. I will provide you with my name/CV, etc., in a e-mail during the day. I forgot that this account does not contain my personal information.
@logological I replied over the mail 4 days ago. Could you confirm receiving the email please?
Thank you, t
@i64 Sorry; I'm still catching up on things. I've responded to you by e-mail now.
@dyigitpolat Thanks for volunteering! I'm happy to add you as a reviewer. We'll start the review process once I get one or two more reviewers confirmed.
@ghammad, @mikeaalv, @tomelse, @sgeorge91 would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?
@ZhenchenHong, @SimonMolinsky, @marcoapintoo, @ulf1 would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?
@ZhenchenHong, @SimonMolinsky, @marcoapintoo, @ulf1 would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?
Sure, I am happy to.
@dyigitpolat Thanks for volunteering! I'm happy to add you as a reviewer. We'll start the review process once I get one or two more reviewers confirmed.
I am glad to help @logological!
Great – we now have enough reviewers to start. I'll set up a separate issue for the review and @dyigitpolat, @ZhenchenHong, and @i64 can begin reviewing there right away, or as soon as it's convenient for you.
@editorialbot add @dyigitpolat as reviewer
@dyigitpolat added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @ZhenchenHong as reviewer
@ZhenchenHong added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @i64 as reviewer
@i64 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6881.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@ElektrikAkar<!--end-author-handle-- (Volkan Kumtepeli) Repository: https://github.com/Battery-Intelligence-Lab/dtw-cpp Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@logological<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @dyigitpolat, @ZhenchenHong, @i64 Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ElektrikAkar. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@ElektrikAkar if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: