openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
720 stars 38 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: DTW-C++: Fast dynamic time warping and clustering of time series data #6694

Closed editorialbot closed 4 months ago

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@ElektrikAkar<!--end-author-handle-- (Volkan Kumtepeli) Repository: https://github.com/Battery-Intelligence-Lab/dtw-cpp Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@logological<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @dyigitpolat, @ZhenchenHong, @i64 Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e977a41cc895869aaf1f468a1b4946a3"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e977a41cc895869aaf1f468a1b4946a3/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e977a41cc895869aaf1f468a1b4946a3/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e977a41cc895869aaf1f468a1b4946a3)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ElektrikAkar. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ElektrikAkar if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.28 s (515.6 files/s, 672458.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                             27              0              0         176993
CSS                              3            788            255           3626
C++                             22            503            468           1459
CMake                           24            196            180           1187
Markdown                        28            261              0            756
C/C++ Header                    22            279            419            754
YAML                             9             41             20            368
Python                           6             62             63            172
TeX                              1             13              0            153
HTML                             1              7             20             61
TOML                             1              0              0              3
SVG                              1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           145           2150           1425         185533
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   349  Volkan Kumtepeli
   174  beckyperriment
    31  David Howey
     5  dependabot[bot]
editorialbot commented 5 months ago
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.is.2015.04.007 is OK
- 10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163055 is OK
- 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.09.013 is OK
- 10.1109/DSAA49011.2020.00096 is OK
- 10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163055 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109628 is OK
- 10.1007/s12532-017-0130-5 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: wannesm/dtaidistance v2. 0.0
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The UCR Time Series Classification Archive
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Tslearn, A Machine Learning Toolkit for Time Serie...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The UCR Time Series Classification Archive
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Fast dynamic time warping and clustering in C++

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2926

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

crvernon commented 5 months ago

:wave: @ElektrikAkar - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We are currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

crvernon commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot invite @logological as editor

Hi @logological, do you think you can take this one on as editor?

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

logological commented 5 months ago

@editorialbot assign @logological as editor

editorialbot commented 5 months ago

Assigned! @logological is now the editor

logological commented 5 months ago

Thank you for your submission, @ElektrikAkar! I will be serving as its editor. At this point I'd like to invite you to suggest to me any reviewers who may be qualified to review this submission. You can search our reviewer database or nominate people you may know from your professional network or through familiarity with their work, but please do not nominate anyone who may have a conflict of interest. I'll meanwhile compile my own list of candidate reviewers.

logological commented 5 months ago

@adavidzh, @peekxc, @AP6YC, @gagolews, would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?

adavidzh commented 5 months ago

@adavidzh, @peekxc, @AP6YC, @gagolews, would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?

Hi @logological, I am afraid that in this period I cannot take this on. Thanks.

gagolews commented 5 months ago

Apologies, I have too many reviews pending at the moment.

logological commented 4 months ago

@ElektrikAkar I'm still in the process of trying to find reviewers for this submission. Could you please let me know whether you would like to nominate any reviewers?

logological commented 4 months ago

@TahiriNadia, @lmcinnes, @taqtiqa-mark, @breznak would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?

lmcinnes commented 4 months ago

@logological it looks very interesting, but I am afraid I do not have enough availability to ensure a timely review. Sorry.

ElektrikAkar commented 4 months ago

Hi @logological ,

Thank you very much. No worries. I do not know the requirements for a reviewer but I can suggest: @dyigitpolat and @i64 if they are happy to help to review :)

dyigitpolat commented 4 months ago

I am available.

i64 commented 4 months ago

Hi, thanks for suggesting me as a reviewer, I am happy to review the paper and the repository.

taqtiqa-mark commented 4 months ago

@logological, thanks for considering me, but I am afraid I do not have availability for a timely review.

logological commented 4 months ago

@i64 Thanks for volunteering. In order for me to assess your suitability as a reviewer, would you mind providing some background on your expertise in the field of software and in the field of this submission? I may have to double-check on this, but I might also need to know your real-life name or identity, if only to exclude the possibility of there being a conflict of interest. You could provide all this information here or by private e-mail to me at tristan@logological.org.

i64 commented 4 months ago

@logological Of course. I will provide you with my name/CV, etc., in a e-mail during the day. I forgot that this account does not contain my personal information.

i64 commented 4 months ago

@logological I replied over the mail 4 days ago. Could you confirm receiving the email please?

Thank you, t

logological commented 4 months ago

@i64 Sorry; I'm still catching up on things. I've responded to you by e-mail now.

logological commented 4 months ago

@dyigitpolat Thanks for volunteering! I'm happy to add you as a reviewer. We'll start the review process once I get one or two more reviewers confirmed.

logological commented 4 months ago

@ghammad, @mikeaalv, @tomelse, @sgeorge91 would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?

logological commented 4 months ago

@ZhenchenHong, @SimonMolinsky, @marcoapintoo, @ulf1 would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?

ZhenchenHong commented 4 months ago

@ZhenchenHong, @SimonMolinsky, @marcoapintoo, @ulf1 would any of you be willing and able to review this submission for JOSS?

Sure, I am happy to.

dyigitpolat commented 4 months ago

@dyigitpolat Thanks for volunteering! I'm happy to add you as a reviewer. We'll start the review process once I get one or two more reviewers confirmed.

I am glad to help @logological!

logological commented 4 months ago

Great – we now have enough reviewers to start. I'll set up a separate issue for the review and @dyigitpolat, @ZhenchenHong, and @i64 can begin reviewing there right away, or as soon as it's convenient for you.

logological commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot add @dyigitpolat as reviewer

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

@dyigitpolat added to the reviewers list!

logological commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot add @ZhenchenHong as reviewer

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

@ZhenchenHong added to the reviewers list!

logological commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot add @i64 as reviewer

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

@i64 added to the reviewers list!

logological commented 4 months ago

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot commented 4 months ago

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6881.