Closed editorialbot closed 3 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.5194/gmd-12-3085-2019 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-14-351-2021 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.04.008 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-2021-192 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8383171 is OK
- 10.5194/egusphere-2024-93 is OK
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3682198/v1 is OK
- 10.1002/met.2035 is OK
- 10.5194/nhess-21-279-2021 is OK
- 10.5194/nhess-2023-158 is OK
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3807553/v1 is OK
- 10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1 is OK
- 10.1175/2008MWR2395.1 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Bayesian Optimization: Open source constrained glo...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: 2022 Disasters in Numbers
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Risk and Uncertainty Assessment for Natural Hazard...
- 10.1017/cbo9781107415379.016 may be a valid DOI for title: Human Health: Impacts, Adaptation, and Co-Benefits
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Oasis Loss Modelling Framework
INVALID DOIs
- https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-393-2021 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-817-2020 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.45 s (514.4 files/s, 235062.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 137 8499 18766 32640
CSV 14 2 0 3462
Jupyter Notebook 38 0 36741 3082
Markdown 10 248 0 737
reStructuredText 20 418 411 523
CSS 1 91 11 405
TeX 2 28 0 365
YAML 6 26 26 207
make 2 29 7 108
Bourne Shell 3 20 1 44
Dockerfile 1 7 8 15
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 234 9368 55971 41588
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
1008 gabriela
394 sameberenz
342 emanuel-schmid
283 Thomas Vogt
186 Carmen Steinmann
167 schmide
107 Lukas Riedel
94 Jan Hartman
93 ThomasRoosli
81 Evelyn-M
73 ingajsa
69 Chahan Kropf
63 samluethi
57 Emanuel Schmid
56 Gabriela Aznar
51 Yue Yu
48 Benoît Guillod
42 zeliest
40 David N. Bresch
40 frqqyy
32 Chahan M. Kropf
29 Samuel Lüthi
29 aleciu
29 gabrielaznar
27 Chris Fairless
23 timschmi95
19 Marine Perus
18 Samuel Eberenz
17 Sam Luethi
16 carmensteinmann
15 manniepmkam
14 Nicolas Colombi
14 Simona Meiler
13 wjan262
10 climada
9 Unknown
9 aleeciu
8 Thomas Röösli
8 Zélie Stalhandske
7 Carmen B. Steinmann
6 Samuel Juhel
6 leonie-villiger
5 Alessio Ciullo
5 NicolasColombi
4 KasparTo
4 Pui Man (Mannie) Kam
4 Rachel_B
4 Tobias Geiger
4 climada.ethz.ch
3 Evelyn Mühlhofer
3 davidnbresch
2 Benoit P. Guillod
2 Sarah Hülsen
2 Timo Schmid
2 Zelie Stalhandske
2 raphael-portmann
2 veronicabozzini
1 DarioStocker
1 Kam Lam Yeung
1 Mannie Kam
1 Rachel Bungerer
1 Schmid Timo
1 luseverin
1 scem
1 simonameiler
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 1089
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0
(Check here for OSI approval)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@editorialbot commands
Hello @peanutfun, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
I suggest the following reviewers:
@editorialbot check references
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.5194/gmd-12-3085-2019 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-14-351-2021 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.5194/nhess-21-393-2021 is OK
- 10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.04.008 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-2021-192 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8383171 is OK
- 10.5194/egusphere-2024-93 is OK
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3682198/v1 is OK
- 10.1002/met.2035 is OK
- 10.5194/nhess-21-279-2021 is OK
- 10.5194/nhess-2023-158 is OK
- 10.1017/CBO9781107415379.016 is OK
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3807553/v1 is OK
- 10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1 is OK
- 10.1175/2008MWR2395.1 is OK
- 10.5194/essd-12-817-2020 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Bayesian Optimization: Open source constrained glo...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: 2022 Disasters in Numbers
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT)
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Risk and Uncertainty Assessment for Natural Hazard...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Oasis Loss Modelling Framework
INVALID DOIs
- None
@editorialbot generate pdf
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
:wave: @peanutfun - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We are currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.
For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!
@peanutfun since the majority of this codebase has been reviewed in other publications, will you post a list here showing where the newer code is within the original codebase? Thanks!
@crvernon Thanks for letting me know. We will be patient :)
The newer code is located in the /climada/util/calibrate/ directory in the calibrate-impact-funcions
branch. All additions we submit via this publication, including the paper, a tutorial Jupyter script, and the documentation can be reviewed from the following pull request: https://github.com/CLIMADA-project/climada_python/pull/692
@editorialbot invite @observingClouds as editor
Hello @observingClouds are you able to take this one on as editor right now? It seems like a good fit for your skillset.
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Assigned! @observingClouds is now the editor
@editorialbot add @sunt05 as reviewer
@sunt05 added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @naingeet as reviewer
@naingeet added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6755.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@peanutfun<!--end-author-handle-- (Lukas Riedel) Repository: https://github.com/CLIMADA-project/climada_python Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): calibrate-impact-functions Version: v5 Editor: !--editor-->@observingClouds<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @sunt05, @naingeet Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @peanutfun. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@peanutfun if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: