search

openjournals / joss-reviews

Reviews for the Journal of Open Source Software
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
697 stars 36 forks source link

[PRE REVIEW]: AQCNES: A Quasi-Continuum Non-Equilibrium Solver #6730

Open editorialbot opened 2 months ago

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@shasax<!--end-author-handle-- (Shashank Saxena) Repository: https://gitlab.ethz.ch/mechanics-and-materials/aqcnes Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_submission Version: v1.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@philipcardiff<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: !--reviewers-list-->@streeve<!--end-reviewers-list-- Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c143ea79cfc3f4f93b4a025323f0ee4c"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c143ea79cfc3f4f93b4a025323f0ee4c/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c143ea79cfc3f4f93b4a025323f0ee4c/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c143ea79cfc3f4f93b4a025323f0ee4c)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @shasax. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@shasax if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf
editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=1.56 s (275.3 files/s, 282442.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F#                               9              0              0         348057
SVG                              2              2              2          41174
C/C++ Header                   142           3849           5301          20514
C++                            182           1391           3520           8780
JSON                            21              1              0           2665
CMake                           42            159            643           1156
Markdown                         8            233              0            911
Python                           8            127            183            612
YAML                             3             19             48            208
TeX                              1             36              4            177
Bourne Shell                     7             23            110            141
Dockerfile                       1              6             18             49
TOML                             2              7             30             44
CSV                              1              0              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           429           5853           9859         424490
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   699  Gerhard Bräunlich
   252  Prateek
   252  pgupta@von-neumann
   133  ssaxena
   110  Stefan Zimmermann
   109  Manuel Weberndorfer
    50  oliver
    28  Shashank Saxena
    21  Prateek Gupta
    18  webmanue
    11  migspi
    10  migsp
     9  mspinola
     7  miguelspi
     6  Miguel
     3  Miguel Angel Spinola Fandila
     3  miguel.spinola@mavt.ethz.ch
     2  Prateek-Leibniz
     2  brgerhar
     2  miguel spinola
     1  annywang
     1  bkoelle
     1  blackspur
     1  pgupta
editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1289

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

License info:

🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

:warning: An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with ORCID (0000-0000-0000-0000) for Manuel Weberndorfer. Invalid ORCID.

shasax commented 2 months ago

@editorialbot commands

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Hello @shasax, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
shasax commented 2 months ago

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

shasax commented 2 months ago

Following is the list of suggestions for potential reviewers (GitHub handles without the @): 1) vikramgavini (Prof. Vikram Gavini, Univ. of Michigan) 2) Mponga (Prof. Mauricio Ponga, Univ. of British Columbia) 3) EMartinezPaneda (Prof. Emilio Martinez Paneda, Oxford Univ.) 4) Anshuman5 (Post-doc researcher, Univ. of California, Riverside) 5) corettialessandro (Post-doc researcher, TU Wien, Austria)

Do not hesitate to contact me for any further questions. Regards, Shashank Saxena.

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 2 months ago

@editorialbot invite @richardjgowers as editor

editorialbot commented 2 months ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 month ago

@richardjgowers do you think you can take this one?

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 month ago

@richardjgowers :wave:

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot invite @richardjgowers

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 month ago

@RMeli this one has been waiting quite a while. Is it a submission you could help with?

RMeli commented 1 month ago

In addition, your recent (past year) association with the same organization of a submitter is a COI, for example, being employed at the same institution.

Does this COI is also valid for editors? I'm employed at the same institution as most of the authors (ETH Zurich).

danielskatz commented 1 month ago

Yes, it is. (and btw, I'm at ETH Zürich now 😄)

Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot invite @philipcardiff as editor

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

philipcardiff commented 1 month ago

@editorialbot assign me as editor

editorialbot commented 1 month ago

Assigned! @philipcardiff is now the editor

philipcardiff commented 1 month ago

Hello @pliang279, Would you be interested in reviewing the submission “AQCNES: A Quasi-Continuum Non-Equilibrium Solver”, which we received at JOSS? The link for the submission is https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6730, and the repository is at https://gitlab.ethz.ch/mechanics-and-materials/aqcnes.

If you are unfamiliar with JOSS, the review process is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and encourages author-reviewer-editor conversations. You can have a look at our review criteria (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html) and review checklist (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html) to get an idea of what is expected.

If you are unavailable, feel free to suggest one of your colleagues from the MultiBench project.

philipcardiff commented 1 month ago

Hello @RainierBarrett, Would you be interested in reviewing the submission “AQCNES: A Quasi-Continuum Non-Equilibrium Solver”, which we received at JOSS? The link for the submission is https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6730, and the repository is at https://gitlab.ethz.ch/mechanics-and-materials/aqcnes.

If you are unfamiliar with JOSS, the review process is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and encourages author-reviewer-editor conversations. You can have a look at our review criteria (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html) and review checklist (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html) to get an idea of what is expected.

RainierBarrett commented 1 month ago

Hi Philip, I'm sorry, but I am coming to the end of my postdoc this week and am still scrambling in my job search at this time. I'm afraid I just don't have the time and energy for a review right now. Once things settle down in a few weeks or so I will be happy to review for JOSS in the future.

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 9:26 AM Philip Cardiff @.***> wrote:

Hello @RainierBarrett https://github.com/RainierBarrett, Would you be interested in reviewing the submission “AQCNES: A Quasi-Continuum Non-Equilibrium Solver”, which we received at JOSS? The link for the submission is #6730 https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6730, and the repository is at https://gitlab.ethz.ch/mechanics-and-materials/aqcnes.

If you are unfamiliar with JOSS, the review process is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and encourages author-reviewer-editor conversations. You can have a look at our review criteria ( https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html) and review checklist (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html) to get an idea of what is expected.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6730#issuecomment-2189258420, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADGVFQQI6K5CPQCQKGKD4QTZJGD2RAVCNFSM6AAAAABHLJKSJSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOBZGI2TQNBSGA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

philipcardiff commented 1 month ago

Hi Philip, I'm sorry, but I am coming to the end of my postdoc this week and am still scrambling in my job search at this time. I'm afraid I just don't have the time and energy for a review right now. Once things settle down in a few weeks or so I will be happy to review for JOSS in the future. …

No problem, Rainer. Best of luck finding a job!

philipcardiff commented 1 month ago

Hello @vikramgavini, Would you be interested in reviewing the submission “AQCNES: A Quasi-Continuum Non-Equilibrium Solver”, which we received at JOSS? The link for the submission is https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6730, and the repository is at https://gitlab.ethz.ch/mechanics-and-materials/aqcnes.

If you are unfamiliar with JOSS, the review process is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and encourages author-reviewer-editor conversations. You can have a look at our review criteria (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html) and review checklist (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html) to get an idea of what is expected.

philipcardiff commented 3 weeks ago

Hello @streeve, Would you be interested in reviewing the submission “AQCNES: A Quasi-Continuum Non-Equilibrium Solver”, which we received at JOSS? The link for the submission is https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6730, and the repository is at https://gitlab.ethz.ch/mechanics-and-materials/aqcnes.

There seems to be some commonality with your Cabana library.

streeve commented 3 weeks ago

Happy to review!

philipcardiff commented 3 weeks ago

@editorialbot add @streeve as reviewer

editorialbot commented 3 weeks ago

@streeve added to the reviewers list!

philipcardiff commented 3 weeks ago

Hello @ehomer, Would you be interested in reviewing the submission “AQCNES: A Quasi-Continuum Non-Equilibrium Solver”, which we received at JOSS? The link for the submission is https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6730, and the repository is at https://gitlab.ethz.ch/mechanics-and-materials/aqcnes.

Your article was cited by this work.

If you are unfamiliar with JOSS, the review process is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and encourages author-reviewer-editor conversations. You can have a look at our review criteria (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html) and review checklist (https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html) to get an idea of what is expected.