Open editorialbot opened 1 month ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.05 s (979.5 files/s, 196122.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 25 1584 2748 2650
reStructuredText 15 447 668 659
TeX 1 23 0 361
DOS Batch 1 21 1 150
YAML 3 17 46 137
make 1 22 5 106
Markdown 1 13 0 69
INI 1 11 0 66
TOML 1 2 0 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 49 2140 3468 4203
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
295 Karl Gordon
92 Karl D. Gordon
14 Kristen Larson
7 aidantmcb
4 P. L. Lim
3 krislars
2 Brigitta Sipocz
1 Aidan McBride
1 Pey Lian Lim
1 sohamvg
Paper file info:
π Wordcount for paper.md
is 609
β
The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
β
License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 is OK
- 10.1086/167900 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201015292 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5dbe is OK
- 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 is OK
- 10.1086/191413 is OK
- 10.1086/316293 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0401344 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3a is OK
- 10.1086/376774 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1320 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b7 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c2 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201321686 is OK
- 10.1086/173713 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201423439 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141042 is OK
- 10.1086/424922 is OK
- 10.1086/318651 is OK
- 10.1086/382351 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Narrow band multicolor photometry of reddened and ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Interstellar dust models for extinction and emissi...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Expanded Sample of Small Magellanic Cloud Ultravio...
INVALID DOIs
- None
@karllark β Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
No problem. I've waited a few years to get this paper written, I guess I can wait a little bit for an editor. ;-)
@editorialbot invite @ivastar as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@editorialbot generate pdf
β to generate the most similar paper recommendation list which has been broken for some time.
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
The Dusty Evolved Star Kit (DESK): A Python package for fitting the Spectral Energy Distribution of Evolved Stars
Submitting author: @s-goldman
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Deech08, @TomGoffrey
Similarity score: 0.8488
A-SLOTH: Ancient Stars and Local Observables by Tracing Halos
Submitting author: @HartwigTilman
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @gregbryan, @kaleybrauer
Similarity score: 0.8148
ExoTiC-ISM: A Python package for marginalised exoplanet transit parameters across a grid of systematic instrument models
Submitting author: @ivalaginja
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @hayesla, @mattpitkin
Similarity score: 0.8147
HostPhot: global and local photometry of galaxies hosting supernovae or other transients
Submitting author: @temuller
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Onoddil, @krachyon
Similarity score: 0.8079
coronagraph: Telescope Noise Modeling for Exoplanets in Python
Submitting author: @jlustigy
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @lpueyo
Similarity score: 0.8074
β οΈ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@editorialbot assign @ivastar as editor
Assigned! @ivastar is now the editor
Hi @karllark glad to see this submitted! I'm going to look for reviewers the next week or so. Let me know if you have recommendations.
I don't have any particular suggestions. I can think about it. Should the suggestions come from those already signed up to be JOSS reviewers or can the be anyone?
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@karllark<!--end-author-handle-- (Karl Gordon) Repository: https://github.com/karllark/dust_extinction Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.4.1 Editor: !--editor-->@ivastar<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @karllark. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@karllark if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: